Jessian L. Munoz MD, PhD, MPH , Emma Kelling MPH , Rebecca M. Johnson MS , Cara Buskmiller MD, MS , William E. Whitehead MD, MPH , Luc Joyeux MD, PhD , Roopali V. Donepudi MD , Ahmed A. Nassr MD, PhD , Michael A. Belfort MD, PhD , Jonathan Castillo MD, MPH , Heidi Castillo MD , Magdalena Sanz Cortes MD, PhD
{"title":"胎儿脊髓脊膜膨出的产前修复对胃肠功能的影响。","authors":"Jessian L. Munoz MD, PhD, MPH , Emma Kelling MPH , Rebecca M. Johnson MS , Cara Buskmiller MD, MS , William E. Whitehead MD, MPH , Luc Joyeux MD, PhD , Roopali V. Donepudi MD , Ahmed A. Nassr MD, PhD , Michael A. Belfort MD, PhD , Jonathan Castillo MD, MPH , Heidi Castillo MD , Magdalena Sanz Cortes MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the impact of postnatal, open fetal, and fetoscopic repairs for open neural tube defects (ONTDs) on bowel function and to assess the use of diet modification and medication use to achieve regular bowel function.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2011 to 2020 at our academic referral fetal center. Patients were stratified by route of surgery (postnatal, open prenatal, or fetoscopic prenatal). Bowel function was assessed by patient reported Bristol stool scale as well as a detailed review of current medication usage for bowel management. Patient demographics and clinically relevant outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was bowel function assessed at 30-month follow up visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 150 patients with fetal ONTD underwent repair at our institution. Forty-eight (32%) underwent postnatal repair, 34 (23%) open fetal surgery, and 68 (45%) fetoscopic repair. Eighty-six patients (57%) reported abnormal bowel function at 30 months of life. No differences were noted in abnormal bowel function between surgical approaches (postnatal 35% vs open prenatal 26%, and fetoscopic 49%, <em>P</em> = .08). Patients who underwent postnatal repair were more likely to require oral regimens to achieve normal bowel function compared with either prenatal surgery approach (postnatal 83% vs open prenatal 59%, and fetoscopic 69%, <em>P</em> = .046).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Abnormal bowel function remains a significant morbidity regardless of surgical approach for ONTD. Fetal surgery (open or fetoscopic) for ONTD may result in equivalent bowel function when compared with postnatal repair.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 114573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Prenatal Repair for Fetal Myelomeningocele on Gastrointestinal Function\",\"authors\":\"Jessian L. Munoz MD, PhD, MPH , Emma Kelling MPH , Rebecca M. Johnson MS , Cara Buskmiller MD, MS , William E. Whitehead MD, MPH , Luc Joyeux MD, PhD , Roopali V. Donepudi MD , Ahmed A. Nassr MD, PhD , Michael A. Belfort MD, PhD , Jonathan Castillo MD, MPH , Heidi Castillo MD , Magdalena Sanz Cortes MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the impact of postnatal, open fetal, and fetoscopic repairs for open neural tube defects (ONTDs) on bowel function and to assess the use of diet modification and medication use to achieve regular bowel function.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2011 to 2020 at our academic referral fetal center. Patients were stratified by route of surgery (postnatal, open prenatal, or fetoscopic prenatal). Bowel function was assessed by patient reported Bristol stool scale as well as a detailed review of current medication usage for bowel management. Patient demographics and clinically relevant outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was bowel function assessed at 30-month follow up visit.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 150 patients with fetal ONTD underwent repair at our institution. Forty-eight (32%) underwent postnatal repair, 34 (23%) open fetal surgery, and 68 (45%) fetoscopic repair. Eighty-six patients (57%) reported abnormal bowel function at 30 months of life. No differences were noted in abnormal bowel function between surgical approaches (postnatal 35% vs open prenatal 26%, and fetoscopic 49%, <em>P</em> = .08). Patients who underwent postnatal repair were more likely to require oral regimens to achieve normal bowel function compared with either prenatal surgery approach (postnatal 83% vs open prenatal 59%, and fetoscopic 69%, <em>P</em> = .046).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Abnormal bowel function remains a significant morbidity regardless of surgical approach for ONTD. Fetal surgery (open or fetoscopic) for ONTD may result in equivalent bowel function when compared with postnatal repair.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"282 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114573\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625001131\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625001131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Prenatal Repair for Fetal Myelomeningocele on Gastrointestinal Function
Objectives
To assess the impact of postnatal, open fetal, and fetoscopic repairs for open neural tube defects (ONTDs) on bowel function and to assess the use of diet modification and medication use to achieve regular bowel function.
Study design
A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2011 to 2020 at our academic referral fetal center. Patients were stratified by route of surgery (postnatal, open prenatal, or fetoscopic prenatal). Bowel function was assessed by patient reported Bristol stool scale as well as a detailed review of current medication usage for bowel management. Patient demographics and clinically relevant outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records. The primary outcome was bowel function assessed at 30-month follow up visit.
Results
A total of 150 patients with fetal ONTD underwent repair at our institution. Forty-eight (32%) underwent postnatal repair, 34 (23%) open fetal surgery, and 68 (45%) fetoscopic repair. Eighty-six patients (57%) reported abnormal bowel function at 30 months of life. No differences were noted in abnormal bowel function between surgical approaches (postnatal 35% vs open prenatal 26%, and fetoscopic 49%, P = .08). Patients who underwent postnatal repair were more likely to require oral regimens to achieve normal bowel function compared with either prenatal surgery approach (postnatal 83% vs open prenatal 59%, and fetoscopic 69%, P = .046).
Conclusion
Abnormal bowel function remains a significant morbidity regardless of surgical approach for ONTD. Fetal surgery (open or fetoscopic) for ONTD may result in equivalent bowel function when compared with postnatal repair.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.