注意缺陷多动障碍儿童延迟厌恶的行为和神经功能特征。

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Pilar Fernández-Martín, Daniela Tovar-Suárez, Rocío Rodríguez-Herrera, José J León, Rosa Cánovas, Pilar Flores
{"title":"注意缺陷多动障碍儿童延迟厌恶的行为和神经功能特征。","authors":"Pilar Fernández-Martín, Daniela Tovar-Suárez, Rocío Rodríguez-Herrera, José J León, Rosa Cánovas, Pilar Flores","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03353-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite substantial efforts to unravel cognitive heterogeneity in ADHD, the examination of motivational variability, particularly delay aversion, remains limited. This study aimed to identify homogeneous delay-averse profiles in children with ADHD to understand motivational deficits. Delay-averse profiles were examined in a clinically well-characterized sample of 43 children with ADHD and 47 control participants using cluster analyses on an experiential delay discounting task. External validation analyses included parents' and teachers' clinical ratings, and fNIRS-based resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) from the frontoparietal (FPN) and the default mode (DMN) networks. A five-profile solution best fit the data. Two clusters, labeled Conventional and Conventional-steeper, exhibited a conventional reward discount with increased delay but differed in the discounting slope. Three clusters demonstrated altered discounting: Steep discounting (abrupt devaluation of the reward), Shallow discounting (shallow discounting), and Zero discounting (no devaluation across delay durations). 77.78% of ADHD-C children clustered into steep discounting profiles, while 41.67% of ADHD-IN children were found in Shallow and Zero profiles, showing a significant disparity in the distribution of categorical presentations. External validation showed no differences in clinical ratings. However, clusters showing Zero and Shallow discounting demonstrated hypoconnectivity within and between FPN and DMN nodes. Delay aversion in ADHD spans a continuum from decreased to increased discounting rather than being solely defined by steeper discounting. These findings highlight the relevance of dimensional approaches in capturing ADHD's motivational heterogeneity and identifying distinct neurobiological substrates, with implications for improving diagnostic protocols and intervention strategies through the incorporation of behavioral measures of reward processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971471/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral and neurofunctional profiles of delay aversion in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Pilar Fernández-Martín, Daniela Tovar-Suárez, Rocío Rodríguez-Herrera, José J León, Rosa Cánovas, Pilar Flores\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41398-025-03353-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite substantial efforts to unravel cognitive heterogeneity in ADHD, the examination of motivational variability, particularly delay aversion, remains limited. This study aimed to identify homogeneous delay-averse profiles in children with ADHD to understand motivational deficits. Delay-averse profiles were examined in a clinically well-characterized sample of 43 children with ADHD and 47 control participants using cluster analyses on an experiential delay discounting task. External validation analyses included parents' and teachers' clinical ratings, and fNIRS-based resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) from the frontoparietal (FPN) and the default mode (DMN) networks. A five-profile solution best fit the data. Two clusters, labeled Conventional and Conventional-steeper, exhibited a conventional reward discount with increased delay but differed in the discounting slope. Three clusters demonstrated altered discounting: Steep discounting (abrupt devaluation of the reward), Shallow discounting (shallow discounting), and Zero discounting (no devaluation across delay durations). 77.78% of ADHD-C children clustered into steep discounting profiles, while 41.67% of ADHD-IN children were found in Shallow and Zero profiles, showing a significant disparity in the distribution of categorical presentations. External validation showed no differences in clinical ratings. However, clusters showing Zero and Shallow discounting demonstrated hypoconnectivity within and between FPN and DMN nodes. Delay aversion in ADHD spans a continuum from decreased to increased discounting rather than being solely defined by steeper discounting. These findings highlight the relevance of dimensional approaches in capturing ADHD's motivational heterogeneity and identifying distinct neurobiological substrates, with implications for improving diagnostic protocols and intervention strategies through the incorporation of behavioral measures of reward processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971471/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03353-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03353-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管对ADHD的认知异质性进行了大量的研究,但对动机变异性的研究,特别是对延迟厌恶的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在确定ADHD儿童的同类延迟厌恶概况,以了解动机缺陷。在临床特征良好的43名ADHD儿童和47名对照参与者中,使用对经验延迟折扣任务的聚类分析来检查延迟厌恶概况。外部验证分析包括家长和老师的临床评分,以及来自额顶叶(FPN)和默认模式(DMN)网络的基于fnir的静息状态功能连接(rsFC)。五种方案最适合数据。标记为“常规”和“常规-陡峭”的两个集群,随着延迟的增加,表现出常规奖励折扣,但在折扣斜率上有所不同。三个集群显示了折扣的改变:急剧折扣(奖励突然贬值),浅折扣(浅折扣)和零折扣(延迟持续时间内没有贬值)。77.78%的ADHD-C儿童聚集在陡峭折现型中,而41.67%的ADHD-IN儿童聚集在浅折现型和零折现型中,在分类呈现的分布上存在显著差异。外部验证显示临床评分无差异。然而,显示零折扣和浅折扣的集群表明FPN和DMN节点内部和之间的低连通性。ADHD的延迟厌恶跨越了一个连续体,从减少到增加的折扣,而不是仅仅由陡峭的折扣来定义。这些发现强调了维度方法在捕捉ADHD的动机异质性和识别不同的神经生物学基础方面的相关性,并通过结合奖励处理的行为测量来改进诊断方案和干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behavioral and neurofunctional profiles of delay aversion in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Despite substantial efforts to unravel cognitive heterogeneity in ADHD, the examination of motivational variability, particularly delay aversion, remains limited. This study aimed to identify homogeneous delay-averse profiles in children with ADHD to understand motivational deficits. Delay-averse profiles were examined in a clinically well-characterized sample of 43 children with ADHD and 47 control participants using cluster analyses on an experiential delay discounting task. External validation analyses included parents' and teachers' clinical ratings, and fNIRS-based resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) from the frontoparietal (FPN) and the default mode (DMN) networks. A five-profile solution best fit the data. Two clusters, labeled Conventional and Conventional-steeper, exhibited a conventional reward discount with increased delay but differed in the discounting slope. Three clusters demonstrated altered discounting: Steep discounting (abrupt devaluation of the reward), Shallow discounting (shallow discounting), and Zero discounting (no devaluation across delay durations). 77.78% of ADHD-C children clustered into steep discounting profiles, while 41.67% of ADHD-IN children were found in Shallow and Zero profiles, showing a significant disparity in the distribution of categorical presentations. External validation showed no differences in clinical ratings. However, clusters showing Zero and Shallow discounting demonstrated hypoconnectivity within and between FPN and DMN nodes. Delay aversion in ADHD spans a continuum from decreased to increased discounting rather than being solely defined by steeper discounting. These findings highlight the relevance of dimensional approaches in capturing ADHD's motivational heterogeneity and identifying distinct neurobiological substrates, with implications for improving diagnostic protocols and intervention strategies through the incorporation of behavioral measures of reward processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信