伊朗模拟和数字放射照相诊断参考水平测定的调查:系统文献综述。

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mehdi Ghazizadeh, Mohammad Reza Deevband, Mohammad Reza Kardan, Meysam Tavakoli
{"title":"伊朗模拟和数字放射照相诊断参考水平测定的调查:系统文献综述。","authors":"Mehdi Ghazizadeh, Mohammad Reza Deevband, Mohammad Reza Kardan, Meysam Tavakoli","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although ionizing radiation plays a key role in both diagnosis and treatment, it brings potential risks, including incidence of cancer. Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is described as a tool to optimize the protection in the medical exposure for diagnostic procedures. The objective of this study is to propose a new method to calculate DRL by reviewing a series of articles which are published on the DRL in radiography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study analyzed 16 articles in the last ten years including published data on National and Local DRLs. The weighted mean method was used to propose unique quantities such as the entrance skin dose (ESD) or Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK), and dose area product (DAP) as national DRL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that there were differences in dose values among diagnostic radiology centers for different examinations. The study provides valuable information to calculate national DRL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The weighted mean of the ESD or ESAK and DAP values has been proposed as a new method for calculating national DRL values, which is considered the significant difference in statistical population and number of articles.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":"432-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey on the determination of diagnostic reference levels in analog and digital radiography in Iran: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Ghazizadeh, Mohammad Reza Deevband, Mohammad Reza Kardan, Meysam Tavakoli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rpd/ncaf030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although ionizing radiation plays a key role in both diagnosis and treatment, it brings potential risks, including incidence of cancer. Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is described as a tool to optimize the protection in the medical exposure for diagnostic procedures. The objective of this study is to propose a new method to calculate DRL by reviewing a series of articles which are published on the DRL in radiography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study analyzed 16 articles in the last ten years including published data on National and Local DRLs. The weighted mean method was used to propose unique quantities such as the entrance skin dose (ESD) or Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK), and dose area product (DAP) as national DRL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that there were differences in dose values among diagnostic radiology centers for different examinations. The study provides valuable information to calculate national DRL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The weighted mean of the ESD or ESAK and DAP values has been proposed as a new method for calculating national DRL values, which is considered the significant difference in statistical population and number of articles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"432-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation protection dosimetry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf030\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:虽然电离辐射在诊断和治疗中都起着关键作用,但它也带来了潜在的风险,包括癌症的发病率。诊断参考水平(DRL)被描述为一种工具,用于优化医疗暴露对诊断程序的保护。本研究的目的是通过回顾一系列关于放射学中DRL的文章,提出一种新的计算DRL的方法。材料和方法:该研究分析了过去十年的16篇文章,包括国家和地方drl的发表数据。采用加权平均法提出独特的数量,如入口皮肤剂量(ESD)或入口表面空气Kerma (ESAK)和剂量面积积(DAP)作为国家DRL。结果:不同放射诊断中心对不同检查方法的剂量值存在差异。该研究为计算国家DRL提供了有价值的信息。结论:提出了以ESD或ESAK与DAP值的加权平均值作为计算国家DRL值的新方法,该方法在统计总体和文章数量上具有显著性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey on the determination of diagnostic reference levels in analog and digital radiography in Iran: a systematic literature review.

Introduction: Although ionizing radiation plays a key role in both diagnosis and treatment, it brings potential risks, including incidence of cancer. Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) is described as a tool to optimize the protection in the medical exposure for diagnostic procedures. The objective of this study is to propose a new method to calculate DRL by reviewing a series of articles which are published on the DRL in radiography.

Materials and methods: The study analyzed 16 articles in the last ten years including published data on National and Local DRLs. The weighted mean method was used to propose unique quantities such as the entrance skin dose (ESD) or Entrance Surface Air Kerma (ESAK), and dose area product (DAP) as national DRL.

Results: The results showed that there were differences in dose values among diagnostic radiology centers for different examinations. The study provides valuable information to calculate national DRL.

Conclusion: The weighted mean of the ESD or ESAK and DAP values has been proposed as a new method for calculating national DRL values, which is considered the significant difference in statistical population and number of articles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation protection dosimetry
Radiation protection dosimetry 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信