急诊科收治的接受不同口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者缺血性中风的严重程度和全因死亡风险。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-05 DOI:10.1007/s11239-025-03095-1
Tommasa Vicario, Danilo Menichelli, Alfredo Paolo Mascolo, Marina Diomedi, Sara Cerretti, Francesco Marconi, Pasquale Pignatelli, Carla Paganelli, Daniele Pastori
{"title":"急诊科收治的接受不同口服抗凝剂治疗的心房颤动患者缺血性中风的严重程度和全因死亡风险。","authors":"Tommasa Vicario, Danilo Menichelli, Alfredo Paolo Mascolo, Marina Diomedi, Sara Cerretti, Francesco Marconi, Pasquale Pignatelli, Carla Paganelli, Daniele Pastori","doi":"10.1007/s11239-025-03095-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are non-inferior to Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in preventing ischemic stroke (IS) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, there are limited data regarding stroke severity and prognosis of patients admitted with IS during DOAC treatment. We performed a single center retrospective study including patients with AF on oral anticoagulants admitted to the Emergency Department for IS were included. The primary endpoint was to analyse the severity of stroke evaluated through NIHSS scale according to anticoagulant therapy. The secondary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality. A total of 106 AF patients were included, with a mean age of 81.3 ± 7.5 years. Overall, 54.7% were women and 61.3% on DOAC. The AF patients on DOAC were older, with no other clinical differences. Median NIHSS was 12 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 5-19). At multivariable logistic regression analysis DOAC use (compared to warfarin) was associated with lower risk of moderate-severe/severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 16) (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.355, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.127-0.995). Mechanical thrombectomy was strongly associated with higher severity of stroke (OR 6.113, 95%CI 2.186-17.099). During follow-up, 42 patients died. DOAC use inversely correlated with mortality risk (OR 0.323, 95%CI 0.127-0.822) after adjusting for CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc, time to hospital admission from symptom onset and type of acute treatment. In conclusion, in our contemporary real-world population, patients on DOACs treatment admitted for IS had better outcomes in terms of stroke severity and all-cause mortality compared with patients on VKAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","volume":" ","pages":"576-584"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The severity of ischemic stroke and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation on different oral anticoagulant treatments admitted to the emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Tommasa Vicario, Danilo Menichelli, Alfredo Paolo Mascolo, Marina Diomedi, Sara Cerretti, Francesco Marconi, Pasquale Pignatelli, Carla Paganelli, Daniele Pastori\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11239-025-03095-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are non-inferior to Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in preventing ischemic stroke (IS) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, there are limited data regarding stroke severity and prognosis of patients admitted with IS during DOAC treatment. We performed a single center retrospective study including patients with AF on oral anticoagulants admitted to the Emergency Department for IS were included. The primary endpoint was to analyse the severity of stroke evaluated through NIHSS scale according to anticoagulant therapy. The secondary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality. A total of 106 AF patients were included, with a mean age of 81.3 ± 7.5 years. Overall, 54.7% were women and 61.3% on DOAC. The AF patients on DOAC were older, with no other clinical differences. Median NIHSS was 12 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 5-19). At multivariable logistic regression analysis DOAC use (compared to warfarin) was associated with lower risk of moderate-severe/severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 16) (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.355, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.127-0.995). Mechanical thrombectomy was strongly associated with higher severity of stroke (OR 6.113, 95%CI 2.186-17.099). During follow-up, 42 patients died. DOAC use inversely correlated with mortality risk (OR 0.323, 95%CI 0.127-0.822) after adjusting for CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc, time to hospital admission from symptom onset and type of acute treatment. In conclusion, in our contemporary real-world population, patients on DOACs treatment admitted for IS had better outcomes in terms of stroke severity and all-cause mortality compared with patients on VKAs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"576-584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12043793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03095-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-025-03095-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在预防房颤(AF)患者缺血性卒中(IS)方面不逊色于维生素K拮抗剂(VKA),但关于DOAC治疗期间入住的IS患者卒中严重程度和预后的数据有限。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了急诊因IS入院的口服抗凝药物治疗的房颤患者。主要终点是根据抗凝治疗情况,通过NIHSS量表评估脑卒中严重程度。次要终点是3个月全因死亡率。共纳入106例房颤患者,平均年龄81.3±7.5岁。总体而言,54.7%是女性,61.3%是DOAC。服用DOAC的房颤患者年龄较大,无其他临床差异。NIHSS中位数为12(四分位间距[IQR] 5-19)。在多变量logistic回归分析中,DOAC的使用(与华法林相比)与中重度/重度卒中(NIHSS≥16)的低风险相关(优势比[OR] 0.355, 95%可信区间[95% CI] 0.127-0.995)。机械取栓与较高的脑卒中严重程度密切相关(OR 6.113, 95%CI 2.186-17.099)。随访期间,42例患者死亡。在调整CHA2DS2-VASc、症状出现至住院时间和急性治疗类型后,DOAC的使用与死亡风险呈负相关(OR 0.323, 95%CI 0.127-0.822)。总之,在我们当代的现实世界人群中,接受DOACs治疗的IS患者在卒中严重程度和全因死亡率方面比接受vka治疗的患者有更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The severity of ischemic stroke and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation on different oral anticoagulant treatments admitted to the emergency department.

Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are non-inferior to Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in preventing ischemic stroke (IS) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, there are limited data regarding stroke severity and prognosis of patients admitted with IS during DOAC treatment. We performed a single center retrospective study including patients with AF on oral anticoagulants admitted to the Emergency Department for IS were included. The primary endpoint was to analyse the severity of stroke evaluated through NIHSS scale according to anticoagulant therapy. The secondary endpoint was 3-month all-cause mortality. A total of 106 AF patients were included, with a mean age of 81.3 ± 7.5 years. Overall, 54.7% were women and 61.3% on DOAC. The AF patients on DOAC were older, with no other clinical differences. Median NIHSS was 12 (Interquartile Range [IQR] 5-19). At multivariable logistic regression analysis DOAC use (compared to warfarin) was associated with lower risk of moderate-severe/severe stroke (NIHSS ≥ 16) (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.355, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.127-0.995). Mechanical thrombectomy was strongly associated with higher severity of stroke (OR 6.113, 95%CI 2.186-17.099). During follow-up, 42 patients died. DOAC use inversely correlated with mortality risk (OR 0.323, 95%CI 0.127-0.822) after adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASc, time to hospital admission from symptom onset and type of acute treatment. In conclusion, in our contemporary real-world population, patients on DOACs treatment admitted for IS had better outcomes in terms of stroke severity and all-cause mortality compared with patients on VKAs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis is a long-awaited resource for contemporary cardiologists, hematologists, vascular medicine specialists and clinician-scientists actively involved in treatment decisions and clinical investigation of thrombotic disorders involving the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular systems. The principal focus of the Journal centers on the pathobiology of thrombosis and vascular disorders and the use of anticoagulants, platelet antagonists, cell-based therapies and interventions in scientific investigation, clinical-translational research and patient care. The Journal will publish original work which emphasizes the interface between fundamental scientific principles and clinical investigation, stimulating an interdisciplinary and scholarly dialogue in thrombosis and vascular science. Published works will also define platforms for translational research, drug development, clinical trials and patient-directed applications. The Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis'' integrated format will expand the reader''s knowledge base and provide important insights for both the investigation and direct clinical application of the most rapidly growing fields in medicine-thrombosis and vascular science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信