布比卡因脂质体在骶旁坐骨平面阻滞治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Xuan Pan, Peng Ye, Ting Zheng, Cansheng Gong, Chunying Zheng, Xiaochun Zheng
{"title":"布比卡因脂质体在骶旁坐骨平面阻滞治疗全膝关节置换术后疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Xuan Pan, Peng Ye, Ting Zheng, Cansheng Gong, Chunying Zheng, Xiaochun Zheng","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05733-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postoperative analgesia post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is prevalent. However, its effectiveness in pain control, specifically in the parasacral ischial plane block (PIPB) post-TKA, remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial recruited patients scheduled for unilateral TKA. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 133 mg (Group A) or 266 mg (Group B) LB using the block randomization method. The PIPB effectiveness was assessed by evaluating changes in sensory and motor functions. The primary outcome was the cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest within 72 h postoperatively. All patients were included in the analyses of analgesic efficacy, rehabilitation quality, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 30, 2024, and May 1, 2024, 45 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to Group A (n = 22) and Group B (n = 23). A significant between-group difference was observed in the NRS-AUC<sub>0-72 h</sub> at rest postoperatively (132.3 ± 19.7 vs. 97.3 ± 19.1, p = 0.001), but none was observed in NRS-AUC<sub>0-72 h</sub> during activity (p = 0.642). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant between-group differences in the median onset times of sensory [60 vs. 35(min), p < 0.0001] and motor blocks [85 vs. 50(min), p < 0.0001]. The onset time of sensory block was notably shorter than that of motor block in both groups. No significant variance was observed in the median regression time for the sensory block. A significant between-group difference in the rescue analgesic dosage was observed on the first postoperative day [43.1 vs. 27.2(mg), p = 0.009], with no significant differences in the subsequent two days or the total amount. No significant between-group differences were found in adverse events or rehabilitation quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LB used in the PIPB was effective for analgesia at rest post-TKA, with 266 mg demonstrating superiority. Trial RegistrationThe randomized controlled trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/, No: ChiCTR2400079606).</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in parasacral ischial plane block for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xuan Pan, Peng Ye, Ting Zheng, Cansheng Gong, Chunying Zheng, Xiaochun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-05733-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Utilizing liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postoperative analgesia post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is prevalent. However, its effectiveness in pain control, specifically in the parasacral ischial plane block (PIPB) post-TKA, remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial recruited patients scheduled for unilateral TKA. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 133 mg (Group A) or 266 mg (Group B) LB using the block randomization method. The PIPB effectiveness was assessed by evaluating changes in sensory and motor functions. The primary outcome was the cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest within 72 h postoperatively. All patients were included in the analyses of analgesic efficacy, rehabilitation quality, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 30, 2024, and May 1, 2024, 45 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to Group A (n = 22) and Group B (n = 23). A significant between-group difference was observed in the NRS-AUC<sub>0-72 h</sub> at rest postoperatively (132.3 ± 19.7 vs. 97.3 ± 19.1, p = 0.001), but none was observed in NRS-AUC<sub>0-72 h</sub> during activity (p = 0.642). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant between-group differences in the median onset times of sensory [60 vs. 35(min), p < 0.0001] and motor blocks [85 vs. 50(min), p < 0.0001]. The onset time of sensory block was notably shorter than that of motor block in both groups. No significant variance was observed in the median regression time for the sensory block. A significant between-group difference in the rescue analgesic dosage was observed on the first postoperative day [43.1 vs. 27.2(mg), p = 0.009], with no significant differences in the subsequent two days or the total amount. No significant between-group differences were found in adverse events or rehabilitation quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LB used in the PIPB was effective for analgesia at rest post-TKA, with 266 mg demonstrating superiority. Trial RegistrationThe randomized controlled trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/, No: ChiCTR2400079606).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971916/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05733-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05733-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:布比卡因(LB)脂质体用于全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后镇痛是很普遍的。然而,其在疼痛控制方面的有效性,特别是在骶旁坐骨面阻滞(PIPB)后,仍然未知。方法:这项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验招募了计划进行单侧TKA的患者。采用分组随机法,45例患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受133 mg (a组)或266 mg (B组)LB治疗。通过评估感觉和运动功能的变化来评估PIPB的有效性。主要观察指标为术后72h内数值评定量表(NRS)静息时的累积曲线下面积(AUC)。所有患者均纳入镇痛疗效、康复质量和不良事件分析。结果:在2024年1月30日至2024年5月1日期间,45例患者入组,随机分为A组(n = 22)和B组(n = 23)。术后休息时NRS-AUC0-72 h组间差异有统计学意义(132.3±19.7比97.3±19.1,p = 0.001),但活动时NRS-AUC0-72 h组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.642)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,两组间感觉中位起痛时间差异显著[60 vs 35(min)], p结论:PIPB中使用LB对tka后静息镇痛有效,266 mg具有优势。该随机对照试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(https://www.chictr.org.cn/,编号:ChiCTR2400079606)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine in parasacral ischial plane block for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Utilizing liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for postoperative analgesia post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is prevalent. However, its effectiveness in pain control, specifically in the parasacral ischial plane block (PIPB) post-TKA, remains unknown.

Methods: This single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial recruited patients scheduled for unilateral TKA. Forty-five patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 133 mg (Group A) or 266 mg (Group B) LB using the block randomization method. The PIPB effectiveness was assessed by evaluating changes in sensory and motor functions. The primary outcome was the cumulative area under the curve (AUC) of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest within 72 h postoperatively. All patients were included in the analyses of analgesic efficacy, rehabilitation quality, and adverse events.

Results: Between January 30, 2024, and May 1, 2024, 45 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to Group A (n = 22) and Group B (n = 23). A significant between-group difference was observed in the NRS-AUC0-72 h at rest postoperatively (132.3 ± 19.7 vs. 97.3 ± 19.1, p = 0.001), but none was observed in NRS-AUC0-72 h during activity (p = 0.642). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant between-group differences in the median onset times of sensory [60 vs. 35(min), p < 0.0001] and motor blocks [85 vs. 50(min), p < 0.0001]. The onset time of sensory block was notably shorter than that of motor block in both groups. No significant variance was observed in the median regression time for the sensory block. A significant between-group difference in the rescue analgesic dosage was observed on the first postoperative day [43.1 vs. 27.2(mg), p = 0.009], with no significant differences in the subsequent two days or the total amount. No significant between-group differences were found in adverse events or rehabilitation quality.

Conclusion: LB used in the PIPB was effective for analgesia at rest post-TKA, with 266 mg demonstrating superiority. Trial RegistrationThe randomized controlled trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/, No: ChiCTR2400079606).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信