树脂基陶瓷修复体的临床并发症和存活率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Redhwan Saleh Al-Gabri, Ahmed Keshk, Mahir A Mirah, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi
{"title":"树脂基陶瓷修复体的临床并发症和存活率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Redhwan Saleh Al-Gabri, Ahmed Keshk, Mahir A Mirah, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The existing evidence regarding the clinical complications and survival rates associated with resin matrix ceramics (RMC) remains inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical complications, success, and survival rates of RMC restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in October 2024. Clinical studies evaluating the complications of RMC (polymer infiltrated ceramic network [PICN], and resin nano ceramic [RNC]) restorations were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. A meta-analysis was performed using review manager, employing the inverse variance test with a fixed effects model, and results were presented as risk ratios with a 95% confidence interval, with an alpha level set at ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were included. RMC full and partial crowns exhibited higher rates of clinical complications than ceramic restorations. Laminate and occlusal veneers demonstrated comparable outcomes between RMC and lithium disilicate materials. RMC intracoronal restorations showed clinical complications similar to those of lithium disilicate inlays and onlays but demonstrated lower complications compared to direct composite restorations. The overall success and survival rates of RMC restorations were found to be dependent on the restoration size and cavity design, with poorer success and survival rates associated with full and partial coverage crowns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resin matrix or hybrid ceramics may not be the preferred choice for full and partial coverage restorations. However, resin matrix ceramics demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes for intracoronal restorations and veneers, showing preference over direct composite restorations. Long-term randomized clinical trials are recommended to provide further evidence.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The selection of materials is fundamental for the clinical success of restorations, ensuring prolonged, complication-free survival. It is essential to comprehend the clinical behavior of resin matrix ceramics or hybrid ceramics before their adoption in further clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Complications and Survival Rate of Resin Matrix Ceramic Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Redhwan Saleh Al-Gabri, Ahmed Keshk, Mahir A Mirah, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The existing evidence regarding the clinical complications and survival rates associated with resin matrix ceramics (RMC) remains inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical complications, success, and survival rates of RMC restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in October 2024. Clinical studies evaluating the complications of RMC (polymer infiltrated ceramic network [PICN], and resin nano ceramic [RNC]) restorations were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. A meta-analysis was performed using review manager, employing the inverse variance test with a fixed effects model, and results were presented as risk ratios with a 95% confidence interval, with an alpha level set at ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were included. RMC full and partial crowns exhibited higher rates of clinical complications than ceramic restorations. Laminate and occlusal veneers demonstrated comparable outcomes between RMC and lithium disilicate materials. RMC intracoronal restorations showed clinical complications similar to those of lithium disilicate inlays and onlays but demonstrated lower complications compared to direct composite restorations. The overall success and survival rates of RMC restorations were found to be dependent on the restoration size and cavity design, with poorer success and survival rates associated with full and partial coverage crowns.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resin matrix or hybrid ceramics may not be the preferred choice for full and partial coverage restorations. However, resin matrix ceramics demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes for intracoronal restorations and veneers, showing preference over direct composite restorations. Long-term randomized clinical trials are recommended to provide further evidence.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>The selection of materials is fundamental for the clinical success of restorations, ensuring prolonged, complication-free survival. It is essential to comprehend the clinical behavior of resin matrix ceramics or hybrid ceramics before their adoption in further clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13471\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于树脂基质陶瓷(RMC)相关的临床并发症和生存率的现有证据仍然没有定论。本系统综述旨在评估RMC修复的临床并发症、成功率和存活率。材料与方法:于2024年10月对PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane数据库进行了全面检索。包括评估RMC(聚合物浸润陶瓷网络[PICN]和树脂纳米陶瓷[RNC])修复体并发症的临床研究。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。采用review manager进行meta分析,采用固定效应模型的反方差检验,结果以95%置信区间的风险比表示,α水平设置为≤0.05。结果:纳入21项研究。RMC全冠和部分冠的临床并发症发生率高于陶瓷修复体。层压板和咬合贴面在RMC和二硅酸锂材料之间表现出可比的结果。RMC冠状内修复体的临床并发症与二硅酸锂嵌体和嵌体相似,但与直接复合修复体相比,并发症较低。发现RMC修复体的总体成功率和存活率取决于修复体的大小和腔体设计,全覆盖和部分覆盖冠的成功率和存活率较差。结论:树脂基质或混合陶瓷可能不是全覆盖和部分覆盖修复的首选。然而,树脂基陶瓷在冠状内修复和贴面方面表现出良好的临床效果,优于直接复合修复。建议进行长期随机临床试验以提供进一步的证据。临床意义:材料的选择是临床修复成功的基础,确保延长,无并发症的生存。了解树脂基陶瓷或混合陶瓷在临床应用前的临床行为是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Complications and Survival Rate of Resin Matrix Ceramic Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: The existing evidence regarding the clinical complications and survival rates associated with resin matrix ceramics (RMC) remains inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical complications, success, and survival rates of RMC restorations.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases in October 2024. Clinical studies evaluating the complications of RMC (polymer infiltrated ceramic network [PICN], and resin nano ceramic [RNC]) restorations were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. A meta-analysis was performed using review manager, employing the inverse variance test with a fixed effects model, and results were presented as risk ratios with a 95% confidence interval, with an alpha level set at ≤ 0.05.

Results: Twenty-one studies were included. RMC full and partial crowns exhibited higher rates of clinical complications than ceramic restorations. Laminate and occlusal veneers demonstrated comparable outcomes between RMC and lithium disilicate materials. RMC intracoronal restorations showed clinical complications similar to those of lithium disilicate inlays and onlays but demonstrated lower complications compared to direct composite restorations. The overall success and survival rates of RMC restorations were found to be dependent on the restoration size and cavity design, with poorer success and survival rates associated with full and partial coverage crowns.

Conclusions: Resin matrix or hybrid ceramics may not be the preferred choice for full and partial coverage restorations. However, resin matrix ceramics demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes for intracoronal restorations and veneers, showing preference over direct composite restorations. Long-term randomized clinical trials are recommended to provide further evidence.

Clinical implications: The selection of materials is fundamental for the clinical success of restorations, ensuring prolonged, complication-free survival. It is essential to comprehend the clinical behavior of resin matrix ceramics or hybrid ceramics before their adoption in further clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信