放疗剂量升级未能改善ARST1431治疗中危横纹肌肉瘤的局部控制:儿童肿瘤学组的报告。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Christopher B Jackson, Wei Xue, Abha A Gupta, Amira Qumseya, Roshni Dasgupta, Christine E Hill-Kayser, Aaron C Spalding, David A Rodeberg, Douglas J Harrison, Rajkumar Venkatramani, Suzanne L Wolden
{"title":"放疗剂量升级未能改善ARST1431治疗中危横纹肌肉瘤的局部控制:儿童肿瘤学组的报告。","authors":"Christopher B Jackson, Wei Xue, Abha A Gupta, Amira Qumseya, Roshni Dasgupta, Christine E Hill-Kayser, Aaron C Spalding, David A Rodeberg, Douglas J Harrison, Rajkumar Venkatramani, Suzanne L Wolden","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate local failure (LF) rates for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma treated on the Children's Oncology Group ARST1431 clinical trial, the first and largest international, phase 3 randomized study to use FOXO1 fusion status for risk stratification. To improve local control, radiation therapy (RT) dose was increased to 59.4 Gy for patients with tumors >5 cm and residual gross disease at the time of RT.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>For the 297 patients included, LF was defined as progression or relapse at the primary site. The rate of LF was calculated 3-years after enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LF for group 3, FOXO1 fusion-positive patients (n = 58) compared with fusion-negative patients (n = 175) was 10.7% versus 21.5%, respectively (P = .08). The LF rate for patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis (n = 180; 24.4%) was higher than that of patients with tumors ≤5 cm at diagnosis (n = 117; 9.8%), P = .002. The risk of LF for patients who received proton (n = 99) versus photon RT (n = 126) was not different (16.1% vs 15.9%, P = .8). For the 75 patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis and gross disease at the time of RT, the boost to 59.4 Gy did not improve the 3-year LF rate compared with that of patients who did not receive the boost (29.7% vs 16.1%, P = .6). For patients with group 3/4 disease, those who underwent delayed primary excision (n = 72) had a lower LF rate compared with those who had RT alone (n = 151) (5.8% vs 19.7%, P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On ARST1431, tumors >5 cm at diagnosis had poor local control despite dose escalation to 59.4 Gy. Proton and photon RT had equivalent local control. For select patients, delayed primary excision significantly improved local control.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation Failed to Improve Local Control for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST1431: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher B Jackson, Wei Xue, Abha A Gupta, Amira Qumseya, Roshni Dasgupta, Christine E Hill-Kayser, Aaron C Spalding, David A Rodeberg, Douglas J Harrison, Rajkumar Venkatramani, Suzanne L Wolden\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate local failure (LF) rates for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma treated on the Children's Oncology Group ARST1431 clinical trial, the first and largest international, phase 3 randomized study to use FOXO1 fusion status for risk stratification. To improve local control, radiation therapy (RT) dose was increased to 59.4 Gy for patients with tumors >5 cm and residual gross disease at the time of RT.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>For the 297 patients included, LF was defined as progression or relapse at the primary site. The rate of LF was calculated 3-years after enrollment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LF for group 3, FOXO1 fusion-positive patients (n = 58) compared with fusion-negative patients (n = 175) was 10.7% versus 21.5%, respectively (P = .08). The LF rate for patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis (n = 180; 24.4%) was higher than that of patients with tumors ≤5 cm at diagnosis (n = 117; 9.8%), P = .002. The risk of LF for patients who received proton (n = 99) versus photon RT (n = 126) was not different (16.1% vs 15.9%, P = .8). For the 75 patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis and gross disease at the time of RT, the boost to 59.4 Gy did not improve the 3-year LF rate compared with that of patients who did not receive the boost (29.7% vs 16.1%, P = .6). For patients with group 3/4 disease, those who underwent delayed primary excision (n = 72) had a lower LF rate compared with those who had RT alone (n = 151) (5.8% vs 19.7%, P < .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On ARST1431, tumors >5 cm at diagnosis had poor local control despite dose escalation to 59.4 Gy. Proton and photon RT had equivalent local control. For select patients, delayed primary excision significantly improved local control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.038\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估儿童肿瘤组(COG) ARST1431临床试验中治疗中危横纹肌肉瘤(IR-RMS)患者的局部失败率(LF),这是国际上第一个也是最大的使用FOXO1融合状态进行风险分层的3期随机研究。为了改善局部控制,放疗时肿瘤面积为50 ~ 5cm且大体病变残留的患者放疗剂量增加至59.4 Gy。患者和方法:纳入的297例患者将LF定义为原发部位进展或复发。入组3年后计算LF率。结果:ⅲ组FOXO1融合阳性患者(n=58)与融合阴性患者(n=175)的LF分别为10.7%和21.5% (p=0.08)。诊断时肿瘤bb0 5cm患者的LF率(n = 180;24.4%)高于诊断时肿瘤≤5cm的患者(n = 117;9.8%), p = 0.002。接受质子放射治疗(n=99)和光子放射治疗(n=126)的患者发生LF的风险没有差异(16.1%比15.9%,p=0.8)。对于75名诊断时肿瘤直径为50厘米、接受放射治疗时大体病变的患者,与未接受放射治疗的患者相比,提高59.4 Gy并没有提高3年生存率(29.7% vs. 16.1%, p=0.6)。对于III/IV组疾病患者,接受延迟原发性切除术(DPE)的患者(n=72)的LF率低于单独接受RT的患者(n=151) (5.8% vs. 19.7%)。结论:在ARST1431上,尽管剂量增加到59.4 Gy,但诊断时肿瘤面积为50cm的局部控制较差。质子和光子RT具有等效的局部控制。对于选定的患者,DPE显著改善了局部控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation Failed to Improve Local Control for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST1431: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

Purpose: To evaluate local failure (LF) rates for patients with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma treated on the Children's Oncology Group ARST1431 clinical trial, the first and largest international, phase 3 randomized study to use FOXO1 fusion status for risk stratification. To improve local control, radiation therapy (RT) dose was increased to 59.4 Gy for patients with tumors >5 cm and residual gross disease at the time of RT.

Methods and materials: For the 297 patients included, LF was defined as progression or relapse at the primary site. The rate of LF was calculated 3-years after enrollment.

Results: LF for group 3, FOXO1 fusion-positive patients (n = 58) compared with fusion-negative patients (n = 175) was 10.7% versus 21.5%, respectively (P = .08). The LF rate for patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis (n = 180; 24.4%) was higher than that of patients with tumors ≤5 cm at diagnosis (n = 117; 9.8%), P = .002. The risk of LF for patients who received proton (n = 99) versus photon RT (n = 126) was not different (16.1% vs 15.9%, P = .8). For the 75 patients with tumors >5 cm at diagnosis and gross disease at the time of RT, the boost to 59.4 Gy did not improve the 3-year LF rate compared with that of patients who did not receive the boost (29.7% vs 16.1%, P = .6). For patients with group 3/4 disease, those who underwent delayed primary excision (n = 72) had a lower LF rate compared with those who had RT alone (n = 151) (5.8% vs 19.7%, P < .01).

Conclusions: On ARST1431, tumors >5 cm at diagnosis had poor local control despite dose escalation to 59.4 Gy. Proton and photon RT had equivalent local control. For select patients, delayed primary excision significantly improved local control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信