社区选择的健康预测因素:加拿大安大略省居住流动性的前瞻性队列研究。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emmalin Buajitti, Laura C Rosella
{"title":"社区选择的健康预测因素:加拿大安大略省居住流动性的前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Emmalin Buajitti, Laura C Rosella","doi":"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health selection into neighborhoods describes unhealthy people moving disproportionately to lower-income neighborhoods, producing observable socioeconomic gradients sometimes falsely attributed to neighborhood effects on health. We investigated residential mobility outcomes and their relationship to baseline health using population-level data linkages in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) respondents ages 25 to 64 between 2005 and 2014 (n=93,235). We assessed baseline health using self-reported health and multimorbidity. We captured moves using health administrative data and the Canadian census. We fit multinomial logistic regression models with a six-category residential mobility outcome: (1) non-movers in low-income neighborhoods; (2) non-movers in high-income neighborhoods; (3) movers from low-income to low-income; (4) movers from low-income to high-income; (5) movers from high-income to low-income; and (6) movers from high-income to high-income. We adjusted models for CCHS cycle, age, sex, household income, immigrant status, and residential instability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to those with very good or excellent health, respondents reporting fair or poor health at baseline had higher odds of moving from low- to low-income neighborhoods (aOR=1.73, 95%CI 1.46-2.05), moving from high- to low-income (aOR=1.64, 95%CI 1.35-1.98), moving from low- to high-income (aOR=1.26, 95%CI 1.04-1.54), and not moving within low-income (aOR=1.36, 1.23-1.51) relative to not moving within high-income. Results were consistent for objective health measures, comparing respondents with at least four chronic conditions to those with one or none.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large, population-based study, both subjective and objective measures of health had a strong relationship with residential mobility outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11779,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health predictors of neighborhood selection: a prospective cohort study of residential mobility in Ontario, Canada.\",\"authors\":\"Emmalin Buajitti, Laura C Rosella\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EDE.0000000000001862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health selection into neighborhoods describes unhealthy people moving disproportionately to lower-income neighborhoods, producing observable socioeconomic gradients sometimes falsely attributed to neighborhood effects on health. We investigated residential mobility outcomes and their relationship to baseline health using population-level data linkages in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) respondents ages 25 to 64 between 2005 and 2014 (n=93,235). We assessed baseline health using self-reported health and multimorbidity. We captured moves using health administrative data and the Canadian census. We fit multinomial logistic regression models with a six-category residential mobility outcome: (1) non-movers in low-income neighborhoods; (2) non-movers in high-income neighborhoods; (3) movers from low-income to low-income; (4) movers from low-income to high-income; (5) movers from high-income to low-income; and (6) movers from high-income to high-income. We adjusted models for CCHS cycle, age, sex, household income, immigrant status, and residential instability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to those with very good or excellent health, respondents reporting fair or poor health at baseline had higher odds of moving from low- to low-income neighborhoods (aOR=1.73, 95%CI 1.46-2.05), moving from high- to low-income (aOR=1.64, 95%CI 1.35-1.98), moving from low- to high-income (aOR=1.26, 95%CI 1.04-1.54), and not moving within low-income (aOR=1.36, 1.23-1.51) relative to not moving within high-income. Results were consistent for objective health measures, comparing respondents with at least four chronic conditions to those with one or none.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large, population-based study, both subjective and objective measures of health had a strong relationship with residential mobility outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001862\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康选择进入社区描述了不健康的人不成比例地迁移到低收入社区,产生可观察到的社会经济梯度,有时被错误地归因于社区对健康的影响。我们利用加拿大安大略省人口水平的数据联系调查了居住流动性结果及其与基线健康的关系。方法:我们纳入了2005年至2014年加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS) 25至64岁的受访者(n= 93235)。我们使用自我报告的健康和多病来评估基线健康。我们使用卫生管理数据和加拿大人口普查来捕捉移动。我们将多项逻辑回归模型拟合为六类住宅流动性结果:(1)低收入社区的非迁入者;(2)高收入社区的非迁入者;(3)从低收入者转移到低收入者;(4)从低收入向高收入转移;(5)从高收入向低收入转移;(6)从高收入向高收入转移。我们调整了CCHS周期、年龄、性别、家庭收入、移民身份和居住不稳定性的模型。结果:与健康状况非常好或非常好的人相比,基线时健康状况一般或较差的受访者从低收入社区迁移到低收入社区(aOR=1.73, 95%CI 1.46-2.05)、从高收入社区迁移到低收入社区(aOR=1.64, 95%CI 1.35-1.98)、从低收入社区迁移到高收入社区(aOR=1.26, 95%CI 1.04-1.54)、不在低收入社区迁移(aOR=1.36, 1.23-1.51)的几率高于不在高收入社区迁移的几率。客观健康指标的结果是一致的,将至少有四种慢性病的受访者与有一种或没有慢性病的受访者进行比较。结论:在一项基于人群的大型研究中,主观和客观的健康指标与居住流动性结果有很强的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health predictors of neighborhood selection: a prospective cohort study of residential mobility in Ontario, Canada.

Background: Health selection into neighborhoods describes unhealthy people moving disproportionately to lower-income neighborhoods, producing observable socioeconomic gradients sometimes falsely attributed to neighborhood effects on health. We investigated residential mobility outcomes and their relationship to baseline health using population-level data linkages in Ontario, Canada.

Methods: We included Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) respondents ages 25 to 64 between 2005 and 2014 (n=93,235). We assessed baseline health using self-reported health and multimorbidity. We captured moves using health administrative data and the Canadian census. We fit multinomial logistic regression models with a six-category residential mobility outcome: (1) non-movers in low-income neighborhoods; (2) non-movers in high-income neighborhoods; (3) movers from low-income to low-income; (4) movers from low-income to high-income; (5) movers from high-income to low-income; and (6) movers from high-income to high-income. We adjusted models for CCHS cycle, age, sex, household income, immigrant status, and residential instability.

Results: Compared to those with very good or excellent health, respondents reporting fair or poor health at baseline had higher odds of moving from low- to low-income neighborhoods (aOR=1.73, 95%CI 1.46-2.05), moving from high- to low-income (aOR=1.64, 95%CI 1.35-1.98), moving from low- to high-income (aOR=1.26, 95%CI 1.04-1.54), and not moving within low-income (aOR=1.36, 1.23-1.51) relative to not moving within high-income. Results were consistent for objective health measures, comparing respondents with at least four chronic conditions to those with one or none.

Conclusions: In a large, population-based study, both subjective and objective measures of health had a strong relationship with residential mobility outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology
Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
177
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology publishes original research from all fields of epidemiology. The journal also welcomes review articles and meta-analyses, novel hypotheses, descriptions and applications of new methods, and discussions of research theory or public health policy. We give special consideration to papers from developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信