高剂量率和低剂量率前列腺近距离放疗联合外束放疗治疗不良前列腺癌的随机比较:中位随访74个月后的疗效结果。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Juanita Crook, Jui-Chi Cheng, Gregory Arbour, Cynthia Araujo, Deidre Batchelar, David Kim, David Petrik, Tracey Rose, Francois Bachand
{"title":"高剂量率和低剂量率前列腺近距离放疗联合外束放疗治疗不良前列腺癌的随机比较:中位随访74个月后的疗效结果。","authors":"Juanita Crook, Jui-Chi Cheng, Gregory Arbour, Cynthia Araujo, Deidre Batchelar, David Kim, David Petrik, Tracey Rose, Francois Bachand","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This single-center randomized trial compared health-related Quality of Life for men with unfavorable localized prostate cancer treated with combined pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and prostate brachytherapy, randomly assigned to high-dose rate (HDR) or low-dose rate (LDR). We now report efficacy outcomes with a minimum 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consenting patients receiving pelvic EBRT combined with prostate brachytherapy were randomized to either LDR (110 Gy) or HDR (15 Gy). Androgen deprivation was used in 76% of patients. EBRT delivered 46 Gy/23 using intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (68%) or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (32%). Follow-up up was 1, 3, and 6 months, then every 6 months to 3 years, and then annually. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤0.2 ng/mL at 4 years defined cure. Biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) and overall survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods. All failures were investigated by imaging (computed tomography, bone scan, and/or Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ± biopsy if PET was not available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2014 to December 2019, 195 men (42% intermediate risk/58% high risk) were randomly assigned: 108 to HDR and 87 to LDR. The median age was 71 years. Median PSA was 11.6 ng/mL (mean, 27.0 ng/mL). Median follow-up was 74 months (43-116 m). The median PSA nadirs were 0.07 and 0.08 in HDR and LDR (P = .16), and time to nadir was 13.8 and 14.1 months, respectively (P = .87). Four-year PSA ≤0.2 was maintained in 81% and 83% of HDR and LDR (P = .91). Eight-year bPFS (nadir + 2) was 86% and 85%, respectively. Eighteen of 22 biochemical failures have been identified; 3 are isolated local failures, whereas 14 are distant failures (isolated 11; 3 combined).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small, randomized comparison, efficacy analysis shows no difference between LDR and HDR boost in bPFS at 5 and 8 years and confirms the excellent efficacy of dose escalation using prostate brachytherapy as documented in Ascende-RT for unfavorable localized prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Comparison of High-Dose-Rate and Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Combined With External Beam Radiation Therapy for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: Efficacy Results After Median Follow-up of 74 Months.\",\"authors\":\"Juanita Crook, Jui-Chi Cheng, Gregory Arbour, Cynthia Araujo, Deidre Batchelar, David Kim, David Petrik, Tracey Rose, Francois Bachand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This single-center randomized trial compared health-related Quality of Life for men with unfavorable localized prostate cancer treated with combined pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and prostate brachytherapy, randomly assigned to high-dose rate (HDR) or low-dose rate (LDR). We now report efficacy outcomes with a minimum 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Consenting patients receiving pelvic EBRT combined with prostate brachytherapy were randomized to either LDR (110 Gy) or HDR (15 Gy). Androgen deprivation was used in 76% of patients. EBRT delivered 46 Gy/23 using intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (68%) or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (32%). Follow-up up was 1, 3, and 6 months, then every 6 months to 3 years, and then annually. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤0.2 ng/mL at 4 years defined cure. Biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) and overall survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods. All failures were investigated by imaging (computed tomography, bone scan, and/or Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ± biopsy if PET was not available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2014 to December 2019, 195 men (42% intermediate risk/58% high risk) were randomly assigned: 108 to HDR and 87 to LDR. The median age was 71 years. Median PSA was 11.6 ng/mL (mean, 27.0 ng/mL). Median follow-up was 74 months (43-116 m). The median PSA nadirs were 0.07 and 0.08 in HDR and LDR (P = .16), and time to nadir was 13.8 and 14.1 months, respectively (P = .87). Four-year PSA ≤0.2 was maintained in 81% and 83% of HDR and LDR (P = .91). Eight-year bPFS (nadir + 2) was 86% and 85%, respectively. Eighteen of 22 biochemical failures have been identified; 3 are isolated local failures, whereas 14 are distant failures (isolated 11; 3 combined).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this small, randomized comparison, efficacy analysis shows no difference between LDR and HDR boost in bPFS at 5 and 8 years and confirms the excellent efficacy of dose escalation using prostate brachytherapy as documented in Ascende-RT for unfavorable localized prostate cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.053\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本单中心随机试验比较盆腔外束放射(EBRT)和前列腺近距离治疗(BT)联合治疗的不利局限性前列腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量,随机分为高剂量率(HDR)和低剂量率(LDR)两组。我们现在报告至少5年随访的疗效结果。材料和方法:同意接受盆腔EBRT联合前列腺BT的患者随机分为LDR (110Gy)和HDR (15Gy)两组。76%的患者采用雄激素剥夺。EBRT采用IMRT或VMAT(68%)或3DcRT(32%)的治疗效果为46 Gy/23。随访分别为1个月、3个月和6个月,然后每6个月至3年随访一次,然后每年随访一次。4年定义治愈时PSA≤0.2ng/ml。采用Kaplan Meier法计算生化无故障生存期(bFFS)和总生存期(OS)。所有失败均通过影像学(CT,骨扫描和/或PSMA PET)±活检(如果PET不可用)进行调查。结果:从2014年1月到2019年12月,195名男性(42% IR/ 58% HR)被随机分配:108名HDR和87名LDR。中位年龄为71岁。中位PSA为11.6 ng/ml(平均27.0 ng/ml)。中位随访时间为74个月(4300万- 1.16亿)。HDR和LDR的中位PSA最低点分别为0.07和0.08 (p=0.16),至最低点的时间分别为13.8和14.1个月(p=0.87)。HDR和LDR患者维持4年PSA≤0.2的分别为81%和83% (p=0.91)。8年(最低值+2)分别为86%和85%。22个BF中有18个已被确定:3个是分离的LF, 14个是远距离的(分离的11个;3)相结合。结论:在这项小型随机比较中,疗效分析显示,5年和8年生化FFS的LDR和HDR提高没有差异,并证实了Ascende-RT中记录的前列腺近距离放疗剂量递增治疗不利的局限性前列腺癌的良好疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Randomized Comparison of High-Dose-Rate and Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy Combined With External Beam Radiation Therapy for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: Efficacy Results After Median Follow-up of 74 Months.

Purpose: This single-center randomized trial compared health-related Quality of Life for men with unfavorable localized prostate cancer treated with combined pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and prostate brachytherapy, randomly assigned to high-dose rate (HDR) or low-dose rate (LDR). We now report efficacy outcomes with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Materials and methods: Consenting patients receiving pelvic EBRT combined with prostate brachytherapy were randomized to either LDR (110 Gy) or HDR (15 Gy). Androgen deprivation was used in 76% of patients. EBRT delivered 46 Gy/23 using intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (68%) or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (32%). Follow-up up was 1, 3, and 6 months, then every 6 months to 3 years, and then annually. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤0.2 ng/mL at 4 years defined cure. Biochemical failure-free survival (bFFS) and overall survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier methods. All failures were investigated by imaging (computed tomography, bone scan, and/or Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen- Positron Emission Tomography (PET) ± biopsy if PET was not available.

Results: From January 2014 to December 2019, 195 men (42% intermediate risk/58% high risk) were randomly assigned: 108 to HDR and 87 to LDR. The median age was 71 years. Median PSA was 11.6 ng/mL (mean, 27.0 ng/mL). Median follow-up was 74 months (43-116 m). The median PSA nadirs were 0.07 and 0.08 in HDR and LDR (P = .16), and time to nadir was 13.8 and 14.1 months, respectively (P = .87). Four-year PSA ≤0.2 was maintained in 81% and 83% of HDR and LDR (P = .91). Eight-year bPFS (nadir + 2) was 86% and 85%, respectively. Eighteen of 22 biochemical failures have been identified; 3 are isolated local failures, whereas 14 are distant failures (isolated 11; 3 combined).

Conclusions: In this small, randomized comparison, efficacy analysis shows no difference between LDR and HDR boost in bPFS at 5 and 8 years and confirms the excellent efficacy of dose escalation using prostate brachytherapy as documented in Ascende-RT for unfavorable localized prostate cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信