神经精神症状与运动认知危险综合征之间的关系

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Fei-Fei Jia, Chun-Xiao Liu, Shao-Min Cheng, Xiao-Yu Qian, Cong-di Wang
{"title":"神经精神症状与运动认知危险综合征之间的关系","authors":"Fei-Fei Jia, Chun-Xiao Liu, Shao-Min Cheng, Xiao-Yu Qian, Cong-di Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12888-025-06770-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We examined the association between neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), a predementia condition indicating a higher risk for dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 2800 older adults (≥ 65 years) was analyzed using binomial logistic regression to investigate the cross-sectional relationship between specific NPS and MCR. Additionally, a longitudinal analysis involving 1352 adults explored whether baseline NPS predicted incident MCR risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects with MCR exhibited higher prevalence of NPS. The most common NPS in MCR were affective symptoms: apathy (71.5%), anxiety (55.4%), and depression (45.7%). The prevalence of specific NPS in MCR was higher for hallucinations (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.23-2.51), sleep impairment (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.14-1.73), apathy (OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.67-4.10), delusions (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.25-2.84), irritability (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.56-2.53), depression (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.49-1.98), and anxiety (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.62-2.28). Longitudinally, baseline apathy (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.17-2.42), depression (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.31-2.21), and anxiety (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.23-2.31) significantly predicted incident MCR (p < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that apathy, depression, and anxiety are predictive of MCR, underscoring the importance of NPS screening in identifying individuals at risk. Early detection could facilitate the development of interventions to prevent dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":"25 1","pages":"336"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and motoric cognitive risk syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Fei-Fei Jia, Chun-Xiao Liu, Shao-Min Cheng, Xiao-Yu Qian, Cong-di Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12888-025-06770-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We examined the association between neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), a predementia condition indicating a higher risk for dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sample of 2800 older adults (≥ 65 years) was analyzed using binomial logistic regression to investigate the cross-sectional relationship between specific NPS and MCR. Additionally, a longitudinal analysis involving 1352 adults explored whether baseline NPS predicted incident MCR risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects with MCR exhibited higher prevalence of NPS. The most common NPS in MCR were affective symptoms: apathy (71.5%), anxiety (55.4%), and depression (45.7%). The prevalence of specific NPS in MCR was higher for hallucinations (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.23-2.51), sleep impairment (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.14-1.73), apathy (OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.67-4.10), delusions (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.25-2.84), irritability (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.56-2.53), depression (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.49-1.98), and anxiety (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.62-2.28). Longitudinally, baseline apathy (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.17-2.42), depression (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.31-2.21), and anxiety (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.23-2.31) significantly predicted incident MCR (p < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings suggest that apathy, depression, and anxiety are predictive of MCR, underscoring the importance of NPS screening in identifying individuals at risk. Early detection could facilitate the development of interventions to prevent dementia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971857/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06770-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06770-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了神经精神症状(NPS)和运动认知风险综合征(MCR)之间的关系,运动认知风险综合征是一种痴呆前状态,表明痴呆的风险较高。方法:采用二项logistic回归分析2800例老年人(≥65岁)特异性NPS与MCR的横断面关系。此外,一项涉及1352名成年人的纵向分析探讨了基线NPS是否能预测MCR事件风险。结果:MCR组NPS患病率较高。MCR中最常见的NPS是情感性症状:冷漠(71.5%)、焦虑(55.4%)和抑郁(45.7%)。MCR中特定NPS的患病率较高的是幻觉(OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.23-2.51)、睡眠障碍(OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.14-1.73)、冷漠(OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.67-4.10)、妄想(OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.25-2.84)、易怒(OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.49-1.98)、抑郁(OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.62-2.28)和焦虑(OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.62-2.28)。纵向上,基线冷漠(OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.17-2.42)、抑郁(OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.31-2.21)和焦虑(OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.23-2.31)显著预测MCR的发生(p)。结论:研究结果表明,冷漠、抑郁和焦虑可预测MCR的发生,强调了NPS筛查在识别高危个体中的重要性。早期发现有助于制定预防痴呆症的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and motoric cognitive risk syndrome.

Introduction: We examined the association between neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR), a predementia condition indicating a higher risk for dementia.

Methods: A sample of 2800 older adults (≥ 65 years) was analyzed using binomial logistic regression to investigate the cross-sectional relationship between specific NPS and MCR. Additionally, a longitudinal analysis involving 1352 adults explored whether baseline NPS predicted incident MCR risk.

Results: Subjects with MCR exhibited higher prevalence of NPS. The most common NPS in MCR were affective symptoms: apathy (71.5%), anxiety (55.4%), and depression (45.7%). The prevalence of specific NPS in MCR was higher for hallucinations (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.23-2.51), sleep impairment (OR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.14-1.73), apathy (OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 2.67-4.10), delusions (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.25-2.84), irritability (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.56-2.53), depression (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.49-1.98), and anxiety (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.62-2.28). Longitudinally, baseline apathy (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.17-2.42), depression (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.31-2.21), and anxiety (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.23-2.31) significantly predicted incident MCR (p < 0.005).

Conclusions: Findings suggest that apathy, depression, and anxiety are predictive of MCR, underscoring the importance of NPS screening in identifying individuals at risk. Early detection could facilitate the development of interventions to prevent dementia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信