IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jonathan Hensman, Yasmine El Allali, Hind Almushattat, Coen de Vente, Clara I Sánchez, Camiel J F Boon
{"title":"Deep learning model for detecting cystoid fluid collections on optical coherence tomography in X-linked retinoschisis patients.","authors":"Jonathan Hensman, Yasmine El Allali, Hind Almushattat, Coen de Vente, Clara I Sánchez, Camiel J F Boon","doi":"10.1111/aos.17495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To validate a deep learning (DL) framework for detecting and quantifying cystoid fluid collections (CFC) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A no-new-U-Net model was trained using 112 OCT volumes from the RETOUCH challenge (70 for training and 42 for internal testing). External validation involved 37 SD-OCT scans from 20 XLRS patients, including 20 randomly sampled B-scans and 17 manually selected central B-scans. Three graders manually delineated the CFC on these B-scans in this external test set. The model's efficacy was evaluated using Dice and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) scores, assessed exclusively on the test set comprising B-scans from XLRS patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the randomly sampled B-scans, the model achieved a mean Dice score of 0.886 (±0.010), compared to 0.912 (±0.014) for the observers. For the manually selected central B-scans, the Dice scores were 0.936 (±0.012) for the model and 0.946 (±0.012) for the graders. ICC scores between the model and reference were 0.945 (±0.014) for the randomly selected and 0.964 (±0.011) for the manually selected B-scans. Among the graders, ICC scores were 0.979 (±0.008) and 0.981 (±0.011), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our validated DL model accurately segments and quantifies CFC on SD-OCT in XLRS, paving the way for reliable monitoring of structural changes. However, systematic overestimation by the DL model was observed, highlighting a key limitation for future refinement.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17495","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证一种深度学习(DL)框架,用于检测和量化X连锁视网膜裂孔症(XLRS)患者光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)上的囊样积液(CFC):使用RETOUCH挑战赛中的112个OCT图像(70个用于训练,42个用于内部测试)训练了一个无新U-Net模型。外部验证涉及 20 名 XLRS 患者的 37 张 SD-OCT 扫描,包括 20 张随机抽样的 B 扫描和 17 张人工选择的中心 B 扫描。在外部测试集中,三位分级员在这些 B 扫描上手动划分了 CFC。使用 Dice 和类内相关系数 (ICC) 分数对模型的有效性进行评估,评估仅在由 XLRS 患者 B-scan 组成的测试集上进行:对于随机抽样的 B 扫描,模型的平均 Dice 得分为 0.886 (±0.010),而观察者的 Dice 得分为 0.912 (±0.014)。对于人工选择的中心 B 扫描,模型的 Dice 得分为 0.936(±0.012),分级人员的 Dice 得分为 0.946(±0.012)。随机选取的模型和参照物之间的 ICC 分数分别为 0.945 (±0.014) 和 0.964 (±0.011)。在分级人员中,ICC 分数分别为 0.979 (±0.008) 和 0.981 (±0.011):我们验证的 DL 模型能准确地对 XLRS 中 SD-OCT 上的 CFC 进行分段和量化,为可靠地监测结构变化铺平了道路。然而,我们观察到 DL 模型系统性地高估了 CFC,这凸显了未来改进的关键局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep learning model for detecting cystoid fluid collections on optical coherence tomography in X-linked retinoschisis patients.

Purpose: To validate a deep learning (DL) framework for detecting and quantifying cystoid fluid collections (CFC) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) patients.

Methods: A no-new-U-Net model was trained using 112 OCT volumes from the RETOUCH challenge (70 for training and 42 for internal testing). External validation involved 37 SD-OCT scans from 20 XLRS patients, including 20 randomly sampled B-scans and 17 manually selected central B-scans. Three graders manually delineated the CFC on these B-scans in this external test set. The model's efficacy was evaluated using Dice and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) scores, assessed exclusively on the test set comprising B-scans from XLRS patients.

Results: For the randomly sampled B-scans, the model achieved a mean Dice score of 0.886 (±0.010), compared to 0.912 (±0.014) for the observers. For the manually selected central B-scans, the Dice scores were 0.936 (±0.012) for the model and 0.946 (±0.012) for the graders. ICC scores between the model and reference were 0.945 (±0.014) for the randomly selected and 0.964 (±0.011) for the manually selected B-scans. Among the graders, ICC scores were 0.979 (±0.008) and 0.981 (±0.011), respectively.

Conclusions: Our validated DL model accurately segments and quantifies CFC on SD-OCT in XLRS, paving the way for reliable monitoring of structural changes. However, systematic overestimation by the DL model was observed, highlighting a key limitation for future refinement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信