IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Zhen-Tao Fei, Wei Huang, Dan-Ping Zhou, Yang Yang, Ping Liu, Ning Gan, Ping-Ping He, Dan Ye, Hua-Rui Liu, Xu-Hui Liu, Lu Xia
{"title":"Clinical efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective analysis and literature review.","authors":"Zhen-Tao Fei, Wei Huang, Dan-Ping Zhou, Yang Yang, Ping Liu, Ning Gan, Ping-Ping He, Dan Ye, Hua-Rui Liu, Xu-Hui Liu, Lu Xia","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-10874-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis, with high morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study evaluates the clinical efficacy of linezolid in patients with TBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 99 TBM patients treated at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from June 2013 to March 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving standard therapy (n = 43) and those receiving standard therapy plus linezolid (n = 56). Clinical outcomes, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, and adverse events were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the included patients, 42.4% were female, and the median age was 24.00 (7.00-44.00) years. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. After six months of treatment, both groups showed improvements in cerebrospinal fluid parameters, with no significant differences in intracranial pressure, white blood cell count, glucose, or chloride levels (all P > 0.05). Adding linezolid significantly reduced cerebrospinal fluid protein levels compared to the standard therapy group (0.873 [0.228-1.591] g/L vs. 0.172 [-0.691-0.559] g/L, P = 0.018), correlating with better 6-month survival (adjusted OR 1.850, 95% CI 1.111-3.081, P = 0.018), with a stronger effect in critically ill patients (1.010 [0.257-2.019] g/L vs. 0.121 [-0.556-0.510] g/L, P = 0.004). Although intracranial lesion resolution rates were higher in the linezolid group, they were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Adverse event rates were similar between groups (16.1% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.392).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Linezolid appears to offer clinical benefits in managing TBM, particularly in critically ill patients, warranting further prospective studies to optimize treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10874-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结核性脑膜炎(TBM)是结核病中最严重的一种,发病率和死亡率都很高。这项回顾性研究评估了利奈唑胺对TBM患者的临床疗效:我们分析了2013年6月至2020年3月期间在上海市公共卫生临床中心接受治疗的99例TBM患者。患者分为两组:接受标准疗法的患者(43 例)和接受标准疗法加利奈唑胺的患者(56 例)。对临床结果、脑脊液参数和不良事件进行了评估:在纳入的患者中,42.4%为女性,中位年龄为24.00(7.00-44.00)岁。两组患者的基线特征相当。治疗 6 个月后,两组患者的脑脊液参数均有所改善,颅内压、白细胞计数、葡萄糖或氯化物水平无显著差异(均 P > 0.05)。与标准治疗组相比,加入利奈唑胺可明显降低脑脊液蛋白水平(0.873 [0.228-1.591] g/L vs. 0.172 [-0.691-0.559] g/L,P = 0.018),与更好的 6 个月存活率相关(调整后 OR 1.850,95% CI 1.111-3.081,P = 0.018),在重症患者中效果更强(1.010 [0.257-2.019] g/L vs. 0.121 [-0.556-0.510] g/L,P = 0.004)。尽管利奈唑胺组的颅内病灶清除率更高,但无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。两组的不良事件发生率相似(16.1% vs. 18.6%,P = 0.392):结论:利奈唑胺似乎在治疗TBM方面具有临床优势,尤其是在重症患者中,值得进一步开展前瞻性研究,以优化治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective analysis and literature review.

Background: Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis, with high morbidity and mortality. This retrospective study evaluates the clinical efficacy of linezolid in patients with TBM.

Methods: We analyzed 99 TBM patients treated at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center from June 2013 to March 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving standard therapy (n = 43) and those receiving standard therapy plus linezolid (n = 56). Clinical outcomes, cerebrospinal fluid parameters, and adverse events were assessed.

Results: Of the included patients, 42.4% were female, and the median age was 24.00 (7.00-44.00) years. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were comparable. After six months of treatment, both groups showed improvements in cerebrospinal fluid parameters, with no significant differences in intracranial pressure, white blood cell count, glucose, or chloride levels (all P > 0.05). Adding linezolid significantly reduced cerebrospinal fluid protein levels compared to the standard therapy group (0.873 [0.228-1.591] g/L vs. 0.172 [-0.691-0.559] g/L, P = 0.018), correlating with better 6-month survival (adjusted OR 1.850, 95% CI 1.111-3.081, P = 0.018), with a stronger effect in critically ill patients (1.010 [0.257-2.019] g/L vs. 0.121 [-0.556-0.510] g/L, P = 0.004). Although intracranial lesion resolution rates were higher in the linezolid group, they were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Adverse event rates were similar between groups (16.1% vs. 18.6%, P = 0.392).

Conclusion: Linezolid appears to offer clinical benefits in managing TBM, particularly in critically ill patients, warranting further prospective studies to optimize treatment protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信