执行功能与财务风险承担:认知灵活性的关键作用和风险感知的中介效应

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katarzyna Sekścińska, Diana Jaworska, Joanna Rudzińska-Wojciechowska
{"title":"执行功能与财务风险承担:认知灵活性的关键作用和风险感知的中介效应","authors":"Katarzyna Sekścińska,&nbsp;Diana Jaworska,&nbsp;Joanna Rudzińska-Wojciechowska","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Executive functions are crucial for decision-making, yet their role in financial risk-taking remains unclear. This study explores the relationship of three executive functions—inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility—with two areas of financial risk-taking: investing and gambling. Additionally, it examines how risk perception mediates these relationships. An online correlational study was conducted with 399 participants, utilising three measures of executive functions: the Go/No-Go task to assess inhibitory control, the Trail Making Test for cognitive flexibility, and the 2-back task for working memory. Financial measures evaluated participants' general risk propensity and performance in incentivised tasks across both subdomains, alongside measures of risk perception. The findings indicate that cognitive flexibility is the only significant positive predictor of both investment and gambling risk-taking propensity, as well as the riskiness of choices in both domains. Furthermore, the results suggest that risk perception mediates the relationship between cognitive flexibility and financial risk-taking. While working memory was identified as a significant predictor only in the context of gambling risk-taking, inhibitory control did not appear to play a role in financial risk-taking at all.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive Functions and Financial Risk-Taking: The Crucial Role of Cognitive Flexibility and Mediating Effect of Risk-Perception\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna Sekścińska,&nbsp;Diana Jaworska,&nbsp;Joanna Rudzińska-Wojciechowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijop.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Executive functions are crucial for decision-making, yet their role in financial risk-taking remains unclear. This study explores the relationship of three executive functions—inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility—with two areas of financial risk-taking: investing and gambling. Additionally, it examines how risk perception mediates these relationships. An online correlational study was conducted with 399 participants, utilising three measures of executive functions: the Go/No-Go task to assess inhibitory control, the Trail Making Test for cognitive flexibility, and the 2-back task for working memory. Financial measures evaluated participants' general risk propensity and performance in incentivised tasks across both subdomains, alongside measures of risk perception. The findings indicate that cognitive flexibility is the only significant positive predictor of both investment and gambling risk-taking propensity, as well as the riskiness of choices in both domains. Furthermore, the results suggest that risk perception mediates the relationship between cognitive flexibility and financial risk-taking. While working memory was identified as a significant predictor only in the context of gambling risk-taking, inhibitory control did not appear to play a role in financial risk-taking at all.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70046\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

执行职能对决策至关重要,但它们在金融冒险中的作用尚不清楚。这项研究探讨了三种执行功能——抑制控制、工作记忆和认知灵活性——与两个金融冒险领域(投资和赌博)的关系。此外,它还研究了风险感知如何介导这些关系。对399名参与者进行了一项在线相关研究,利用三种执行功能的测量方法:评估抑制控制的Go/No-Go任务,评估认知灵活性的Trail Making Test,以及测试工作记忆的2-back任务。财务指标评估了参与者在两个子领域的一般风险倾向和激励任务中的表现,以及风险感知指标。研究结果表明,认知灵活性是投资和赌博冒险倾向以及这两个领域的选择风险的唯一显著正向预测因子。此外,研究结果表明,风险感知在认知灵活性和金融风险承担之间起中介作用。虽然工作记忆仅在赌博冒险的情况下被认为是一个重要的预测因素,但抑制控制似乎在金融冒险中根本不起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Executive Functions and Financial Risk-Taking: The Crucial Role of Cognitive Flexibility and Mediating Effect of Risk-Perception

Executive functions are crucial for decision-making, yet their role in financial risk-taking remains unclear. This study explores the relationship of three executive functions—inhibitory control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility—with two areas of financial risk-taking: investing and gambling. Additionally, it examines how risk perception mediates these relationships. An online correlational study was conducted with 399 participants, utilising three measures of executive functions: the Go/No-Go task to assess inhibitory control, the Trail Making Test for cognitive flexibility, and the 2-back task for working memory. Financial measures evaluated participants' general risk propensity and performance in incentivised tasks across both subdomains, alongside measures of risk perception. The findings indicate that cognitive flexibility is the only significant positive predictor of both investment and gambling risk-taking propensity, as well as the riskiness of choices in both domains. Furthermore, the results suggest that risk perception mediates the relationship between cognitive flexibility and financial risk-taking. While working memory was identified as a significant predictor only in the context of gambling risk-taking, inhibitory control did not appear to play a role in financial risk-taking at all.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信