COVID-19单位医护人员的生理和心理弹性——宗教信仰的保护作用

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Einat Mader, Janne L. Punski-Hoogervorst, Hernan Kosovsky, Aaron Pinkhasov, Morgan Peltier, Boaz Bloch, Avi Avital
{"title":"COVID-19单位医护人员的生理和心理弹性——宗教信仰的保护作用","authors":"Einat Mader,&nbsp;Janne L. Punski-Hoogervorst,&nbsp;Hernan Kosovsky,&nbsp;Aaron Pinkhasov,&nbsp;Morgan Peltier,&nbsp;Boaz Bloch,&nbsp;Avi Avital","doi":"10.1002/ijop.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted global health, with disproportionate consequences for healthcare workers (HCWs). Religious beliefs and practices may improve psychological resilience by fostering community, providing purpose and giving meaning to hardships. Yet, how religiosity impacts HCWs during a time of crisis is unclear. We therefore performed a cross-sectional study to investigate how religiosity contributes to resilience among HCWs who were routinely exposed to high levels of stress during the pandemic, through a physiological measure (the Auditory Sustained Attention Test; ASAT) and psychological self-reports. Forty-two HCWs were recruited from COVID-19 units and 44 HCWs from general internal medicine units during June and July 2022. COVID-19 HCWs showed significantly elevated emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT, as measured by acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition, that was undetectable with self-reports. Furthermore, after dividing the HCWs into a ‘high’ and ‘low’ religiosity group, those in the ‘low’ group showed higher emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT. Findings suggest that the ASAT has greater sensitivity at detecting emotional and attentional dysregulations than self-reports. Moderate or high religiosity may lead to better performance on the ASAT which could suggest greater resilience to mental health problems in the face of a crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiological and Psychological Resilience Among Healthcare Workers in COVID–19 Units—The Protective Role of Religious Beliefs\",\"authors\":\"Einat Mader,&nbsp;Janne L. Punski-Hoogervorst,&nbsp;Hernan Kosovsky,&nbsp;Aaron Pinkhasov,&nbsp;Morgan Peltier,&nbsp;Boaz Bloch,&nbsp;Avi Avital\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijop.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted global health, with disproportionate consequences for healthcare workers (HCWs). Religious beliefs and practices may improve psychological resilience by fostering community, providing purpose and giving meaning to hardships. Yet, how religiosity impacts HCWs during a time of crisis is unclear. We therefore performed a cross-sectional study to investigate how religiosity contributes to resilience among HCWs who were routinely exposed to high levels of stress during the pandemic, through a physiological measure (the Auditory Sustained Attention Test; ASAT) and psychological self-reports. Forty-two HCWs were recruited from COVID-19 units and 44 HCWs from general internal medicine units during June and July 2022. COVID-19 HCWs showed significantly elevated emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT, as measured by acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition, that was undetectable with self-reports. Furthermore, after dividing the HCWs into a ‘high’ and ‘low’ religiosity group, those in the ‘low’ group showed higher emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT. Findings suggest that the ASAT has greater sensitivity at detecting emotional and attentional dysregulations than self-reports. Moderate or high religiosity may lead to better performance on the ASAT which could suggest greater resilience to mental health problems in the face of a crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.70047\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行深刻影响了全球卫生,对卫生保健工作者造成了不成比例的后果。宗教信仰和习俗可以通过培育社区、提供目标和赋予困难以意义来提高心理弹性。然而,在危机时期,宗教信仰如何影响医护人员尚不清楚。因此,我们进行了一项横断面研究,通过一项生理测量(听觉持续注意力测试;ASAT)和心理自我报告。在2022年6月和7月期间,从COVID-19单位招募了42名卫生保健员,从普通内科单位招募了44名卫生保健员。通过声惊吓和脉冲前抑制来测量,COVID-19 HCWs在ASAT中表现出明显升高的情绪和注意力失调,这在自我报告中无法检测到。此外,在将HCWs分为“高”和“低”宗教信仰组后,“低”宗教信仰组的人在ASAT中表现出更高的情绪和注意力失调。研究结果表明,ASAT在检测情绪和注意力失调方面比自我报告更敏感。中度或高度的宗教信仰可能导致在反卫星测试中的更好表现,这可能表明在面对危机时对心理健康问题有更大的适应能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Physiological and Psychological Resilience Among Healthcare Workers in COVID–19 Units—The Protective Role of Religious Beliefs

Physiological and Psychological Resilience Among Healthcare Workers in COVID–19 Units—The Protective Role of Religious Beliefs

The COVID-19 pandemic profoundly impacted global health, with disproportionate consequences for healthcare workers (HCWs). Religious beliefs and practices may improve psychological resilience by fostering community, providing purpose and giving meaning to hardships. Yet, how religiosity impacts HCWs during a time of crisis is unclear. We therefore performed a cross-sectional study to investigate how religiosity contributes to resilience among HCWs who were routinely exposed to high levels of stress during the pandemic, through a physiological measure (the Auditory Sustained Attention Test; ASAT) and psychological self-reports. Forty-two HCWs were recruited from COVID-19 units and 44 HCWs from general internal medicine units during June and July 2022. COVID-19 HCWs showed significantly elevated emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT, as measured by acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition, that was undetectable with self-reports. Furthermore, after dividing the HCWs into a ‘high’ and ‘low’ religiosity group, those in the ‘low’ group showed higher emotional and attentional dysregulation with the ASAT. Findings suggest that the ASAT has greater sensitivity at detecting emotional and attentional dysregulations than self-reports. Moderate or high religiosity may lead to better performance on the ASAT which could suggest greater resilience to mental health problems in the face of a crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信