IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Merve Günbaş, Merve Dervişoğlu, Dilek Büyükkaya Besen
{"title":"The Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube Videos About Insulin Administration","authors":"Merve Günbaş,&nbsp;Merve Dervişoğlu,&nbsp;Dilek Büyükkaya Besen","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Digital healthcare has turned social media, especially YouTube, into a key platform for patient education. Videos on insulin administration attract significant viewership, but content reliability remains a concern.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the quality and reliability of Turkish YouTube videos on insulin administration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The first 200 videos on the YouTube platform related to “insulin administration” were reviewed, and 33 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated using DISCERN, the Global Quality Score (GQS), and a guideline-based survey for insulin usefulness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 33 videos that met the inclusion criteria, 39.4% were posted by nurses. The usefulness of the videos regarding insulin administration was analyzed using DISCERN and GQS and was evaluated based on their usefulness scores. According to this classification, 45.4% of the videos were found to be very useful, 36.4% were moderately useful, and 18.2% were somewhat useful. The mean ± SD GQS score of the videos was 2.51 ± 1.09 (between “generally poor” and “moderate”) and the mean ± SD DISCERN score was 30.21 ± 8.33, indicating that the videos lacked essential evidence-based information.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Many videos raise concerns about their educational value, with only a small portion being highly informative. This negatively impacts health literacy and complicates education. Providing accurate, reliable content is crucial, and nurses can enhance health literacy, safety, and equity through quality materials.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 数字医疗已将社交媒体,尤其是 YouTube 转变为患者教育的重要平台。有关胰岛素管理的视频吸引了大量观众,但内容的可靠性仍是一个令人担忧的问题。 目的 本研究旨在评估土耳其 YouTube 上有关胰岛素管理的视频的质量和可靠性。 方法 回顾 YouTube 平台上与 "胰岛素管理 "相关的前 200 个视频,并使用 DISCERN、全球质量评分 (GQS) 和基于指南的胰岛素实用性调查对符合纳入标准的 33 个视频进行评估。 结果 在符合纳入标准的 33 个视频中,39.4% 是由护士发布的。使用 DISCERN 和 GQS 分析了这些视频在胰岛素管理方面的实用性,并根据其实用性评分进行了评估。根据这一分类,45.4% 的视频被认为非常有用,36.4% 的视频被认为中等有用,18.2% 的视频被认为有点有用。视频的平均(± SD)GQS 得分为 2.51 ± 1.09(介于 "一般差 "和 "中等 "之间),平均(± SD)DISCERN 得分为 30.21 ± 8.33,表明视频缺乏必要的循证信息。 结论 许多视频的教育价值令人担忧,只有一小部分信息量很大。这对健康素养产生了负面影响,并使教育变得更加复杂。提供准确、可靠的内容至关重要,护士可以通过高质量的材料提高健康素养、安全性和公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Quality and Reliability Analysis of YouTube Videos About Insulin Administration

Background

Digital healthcare has turned social media, especially YouTube, into a key platform for patient education. Videos on insulin administration attract significant viewership, but content reliability remains a concern.

Aim

This study aimed to assess the quality and reliability of Turkish YouTube videos on insulin administration.

Methods

The first 200 videos on the YouTube platform related to “insulin administration” were reviewed, and 33 videos that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated using DISCERN, the Global Quality Score (GQS), and a guideline-based survey for insulin usefulness.

Results

Among the 33 videos that met the inclusion criteria, 39.4% were posted by nurses. The usefulness of the videos regarding insulin administration was analyzed using DISCERN and GQS and was evaluated based on their usefulness scores. According to this classification, 45.4% of the videos were found to be very useful, 36.4% were moderately useful, and 18.2% were somewhat useful. The mean ± SD GQS score of the videos was 2.51 ± 1.09 (between “generally poor” and “moderate”) and the mean ± SD DISCERN score was 30.21 ± 8.33, indicating that the videos lacked essential evidence-based information.

Conclusion

Many videos raise concerns about their educational value, with only a small portion being highly informative. This negatively impacts health literacy and complicates education. Providing accurate, reliable content is crucial, and nurses can enhance health literacy, safety, and equity through quality materials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信