提高司机在送货和拼车服务中的参与度

IF 11.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Lance W. Saunders, Vincent E. Castillo, William J. Rose, Anne E. Dohmen, John E. Bell
{"title":"提高司机在送货和拼车服务中的参与度","authors":"Lance W. Saunders,&nbsp;Vincent E. Castillo,&nbsp;William J. Rose,&nbsp;Anne E. Dohmen,&nbsp;John E. Bell","doi":"10.1111/jbl.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Due to driver autonomy, delivery and rideshare platforms in the sharing economy (SE) face uncertainty in service capacity planning. This study investigates how the alignment between the technical and social subsystems within the overall socio-technical system of SE platforms influences driver engagement. Drawing on socio-technical systems theory, we conceptualize SE platforms as systems defined by the organizational design constructs of centralization, formalization, and complexity. Using a discrete choice experiment with 100 experienced SE drivers, we examine how platform design attributes affect drivers' utility and engagement probability. Our findings reveal that drivers value flexibility, preferring platforms that offer direct task allocation and single-task acceptance features. Contrary to expectations, drivers generally favor base pay–oriented remuneration over promotion-oriented structures. Individual driver characteristics such as SE income dependency and multi-apping tendencies significantly influence platform preferences. The findings contribute to logistics research by empirically establishing the relationship between platform structure and driver utility and by extending the application of organizational design theory to digital labor platforms. Our results provide insights into how firms can reduce capacity uncertainty by engaging SE drivers within their networks, highlighting the importance of aligning platform design with the preferences of a heterogeneous driver population.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Logistics","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Driver Engagement in Delivery and Rideshare Services\",\"authors\":\"Lance W. Saunders,&nbsp;Vincent E. Castillo,&nbsp;William J. Rose,&nbsp;Anne E. Dohmen,&nbsp;John E. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jbl.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Due to driver autonomy, delivery and rideshare platforms in the sharing economy (SE) face uncertainty in service capacity planning. This study investigates how the alignment between the technical and social subsystems within the overall socio-technical system of SE platforms influences driver engagement. Drawing on socio-technical systems theory, we conceptualize SE platforms as systems defined by the organizational design constructs of centralization, formalization, and complexity. Using a discrete choice experiment with 100 experienced SE drivers, we examine how platform design attributes affect drivers' utility and engagement probability. Our findings reveal that drivers value flexibility, preferring platforms that offer direct task allocation and single-task acceptance features. Contrary to expectations, drivers generally favor base pay–oriented remuneration over promotion-oriented structures. Individual driver characteristics such as SE income dependency and multi-apping tendencies significantly influence platform preferences. The findings contribute to logistics research by empirically establishing the relationship between platform structure and driver utility and by extending the application of organizational design theory to digital labor platforms. Our results provide insights into how firms can reduce capacity uncertainty by engaging SE drivers within their networks, highlighting the importance of aligning platform design with the preferences of a heterogeneous driver population.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Logistics\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.70011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jbl.70011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于驾驶员自主驾驶,共享经济中的送货和拼车平台在服务能力规划方面面临不确定性。本研究探讨了在SE平台的整个社会技术系统中,技术和社会子系统之间的一致性如何影响驾驶员的参与。根据社会技术系统理论,我们将SE平台概念化为由集中化、形式化和复杂性的组织设计构造定义的系统。通过对100名经验丰富的SE司机进行离散选择实验,我们研究了平台设计属性如何影响司机的效用和参与概率。我们的研究结果表明,司机重视灵活性,更喜欢提供直接任务分配和单任务接受功能的平台。与预期相反,司机普遍倾向于以基本工资为导向的薪酬结构,而不是以晋升为导向的薪酬结构。个体司机特征,如SE收入依赖和多重驾驶倾向显著影响平台偏好。研究结果通过实证建立平台结构与司机效用之间的关系,并将组织设计理论的应用扩展到数字化劳动平台,为物流研究做出了贡献。我们的研究结果为企业如何通过将SE驾驶员纳入其网络中来降低产能不确定性提供了见解,并强调了将平台设计与异类驾驶员群体的偏好相结合的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Driver Engagement in Delivery and Rideshare Services

Due to driver autonomy, delivery and rideshare platforms in the sharing economy (SE) face uncertainty in service capacity planning. This study investigates how the alignment between the technical and social subsystems within the overall socio-technical system of SE platforms influences driver engagement. Drawing on socio-technical systems theory, we conceptualize SE platforms as systems defined by the organizational design constructs of centralization, formalization, and complexity. Using a discrete choice experiment with 100 experienced SE drivers, we examine how platform design attributes affect drivers' utility and engagement probability. Our findings reveal that drivers value flexibility, preferring platforms that offer direct task allocation and single-task acceptance features. Contrary to expectations, drivers generally favor base pay–oriented remuneration over promotion-oriented structures. Individual driver characteristics such as SE income dependency and multi-apping tendencies significantly influence platform preferences. The findings contribute to logistics research by empirically establishing the relationship between platform structure and driver utility and by extending the application of organizational design theory to digital labor platforms. Our results provide insights into how firms can reduce capacity uncertainty by engaging SE drivers within their networks, highlighting the importance of aligning platform design with the preferences of a heterogeneous driver population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Supply chain management and logistics processes play a crucial role in the success of businesses, both in terms of operations, strategy, and finances. To gain a deep understanding of these processes, it is essential to explore academic literature such as The Journal of Business Logistics. This journal serves as a scholarly platform for sharing original ideas, research findings, and effective strategies in the field of logistics and supply chain management. By providing innovative insights and research-driven knowledge, it equips organizations with the necessary tools to navigate the ever-changing business environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信