“谢谢,但不谢谢”:公众对参与NHS谈话疗法的反应——一个有益的故事?

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Michael J. Scott
{"title":"“谢谢,但不谢谢”:公众对参与NHS谈话疗法的反应——一个有益的故事?","authors":"Michael J. Scott","doi":"10.1002/capr.12852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The English NHS Talking Therapies has been hailed as a world leader in demonstrating outcomes, generating 1.76 million referrals in the year 2022–2023, with a claimed 49.9% recovery rate, but there has been a dearth of independent evaluations. Importantly, there have been no published data on those who only attended one assessment/treatment session. This also applies to public services internationally. The issue of the acceptability of psychological treatment has not been addressed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The user-friendliness of NHS Talking Therapies was examined, drawing on unpublished data revealed following a Freedom Of Information request response to the author in June 2024. These data are set alongside the service's published data to give a more comprehensive view of real-world outcomes and whether it should be a template for other countries to follow.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Almost half (45%) do not complete treatment, and for completers, the results are no better than for placebo. The diagnostic status of almost a third (29.1%) who attend just one session is unknown. The numbers of people who attend one assessment/ treatment session is approximately half of those who attend two or more treatment sessions, but the ratio varies by disorder.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>NHS Talking Therapies' engagement difficulties casts serious doubt on the service's claim to be a ‘world beater’. There is no evidence that NICE-compliant evidence-based psychological treatments have been delivered. While this model has been widely adopted in the UK, this should not be transferred to other service systems without contextualisation and evidence on whether/how some of its components could be implemented in those settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12852","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Thanks, but no thanks’: The public's response to engagement with NHS Talking Therapies – a salutary tale?\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Scott\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/capr.12852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The English NHS Talking Therapies has been hailed as a world leader in demonstrating outcomes, generating 1.76 million referrals in the year 2022–2023, with a claimed 49.9% recovery rate, but there has been a dearth of independent evaluations. Importantly, there have been no published data on those who only attended one assessment/treatment session. This also applies to public services internationally. The issue of the acceptability of psychological treatment has not been addressed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>The user-friendliness of NHS Talking Therapies was examined, drawing on unpublished data revealed following a Freedom Of Information request response to the author in June 2024. These data are set alongside the service's published data to give a more comprehensive view of real-world outcomes and whether it should be a template for other countries to follow.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Almost half (45%) do not complete treatment, and for completers, the results are no better than for placebo. The diagnostic status of almost a third (29.1%) who attend just one session is unknown. The numbers of people who attend one assessment/ treatment session is approximately half of those who attend two or more treatment sessions, but the ratio varies by disorder.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>NHS Talking Therapies' engagement difficulties casts serious doubt on the service's claim to be a ‘world beater’. There is no evidence that NICE-compliant evidence-based psychological treatments have been delivered. While this model has been widely adopted in the UK, this should not be transferred to other service systems without contextualisation and evidence on whether/how some of its components could be implemented in those settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.12852\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12852\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的谈话疗法在展示效果方面被誉为世界领先,在2022年至2023年期间产生了176万次转诊,据称回收率为49.9%,但缺乏独立评估。重要的是,没有关于那些只参加一次评估/治疗会议的人的公开数据。这也适用于国际公共服务。心理治疗的可接受性问题尚未得到解决。方法利用作者于2024年6月应信息自由要求回复后披露的未公开数据,对NHS谈话疗法的用户友好性进行调查。这些数据与该服务公布的数据放在一起,以便更全面地了解现实世界的结果,以及它是否应该成为其他国家效仿的模板。结果:几乎一半(45%)的患者没有完成治疗,对于完成治疗的患者,结果并不比安慰剂组好。几乎三分之一(29.1%)只参加过一次治疗的患者的诊断状况不明。参加一次评估/治疗会议的人数大约是参加两次或两次以上治疗会议的人数的一半,但比例因疾病而异。NHS谈话疗法的参与困难使人们对该服务声称的“世界冠军”产生了严重怀疑。没有证据表明已经提供了符合nice标准的循证心理治疗。虽然这一模式在英国已被广泛采用,但在没有具体情况和证据证明其某些组成部分是否/如何在这些环境中实施的情况下,不应将其转移到其他服务系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Thanks, but no thanks’: The public's response to engagement with NHS Talking Therapies – a salutary tale?

Objectives

The English NHS Talking Therapies has been hailed as a world leader in demonstrating outcomes, generating 1.76 million referrals in the year 2022–2023, with a claimed 49.9% recovery rate, but there has been a dearth of independent evaluations. Importantly, there have been no published data on those who only attended one assessment/treatment session. This also applies to public services internationally. The issue of the acceptability of psychological treatment has not been addressed.

Method

The user-friendliness of NHS Talking Therapies was examined, drawing on unpublished data revealed following a Freedom Of Information request response to the author in June 2024. These data are set alongside the service's published data to give a more comprehensive view of real-world outcomes and whether it should be a template for other countries to follow.

Results

Almost half (45%) do not complete treatment, and for completers, the results are no better than for placebo. The diagnostic status of almost a third (29.1%) who attend just one session is unknown. The numbers of people who attend one assessment/ treatment session is approximately half of those who attend two or more treatment sessions, but the ratio varies by disorder.

Conclusion

NHS Talking Therapies' engagement difficulties casts serious doubt on the service's claim to be a ‘world beater’. There is no evidence that NICE-compliant evidence-based psychological treatments have been delivered. While this model has been widely adopted in the UK, this should not be transferred to other service systems without contextualisation and evidence on whether/how some of its components could be implemented in those settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信