IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Atticus Maddox, Lynette Mackenzie
{"title":"Workplace violence experienced by occupational therapists who visit people in their own homes","authors":"Atticus Maddox,&nbsp;Lynette Mackenzie","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Workplace violence is a common experience for many health professionals. However, little is known about the experience of occupational therapists, specifically those that visit people in their own homes, and experience violence in that context. Home visiting is a fundamental component of practice for many occupational therapists and often takes place with the occupational therapist being alone. This study aimed to explore the experience of this group of occupational therapists, their responses to workplace violence such as reporting, and the impact of their experience on their wellbeing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional online survey was distributed among occupational therapists via NSW Health services and Occupational Therapy Australia with snowball sampling and links on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook. The survey gathered information on demographics, work organisation, exposure to workplace violence, and strategies used to respond to this. Wellbeing was measured using the Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 101 surveys were returned: 97% (<i>n</i> = 97) were female, the mean age was 39 years, 52% (<i>n</i> = 52) were located in capital cities, and most worked in disability care (47%, <i>n</i> = 47) or aged care (46%, <i>n</i> = 46) and worked full time (60%, <i>n</i> = 60). Only 5% (<i>n</i> = 5) identified that they never worked alone. Of those who experienced violence at least occasionally, 74% (<i>n</i> = 74) reported verbal aggression, 27% (<i>n</i> = 27) physical aggression from clients or family members, 20% (<i>n</i> = 20) physical aggression using objects, 43% (<i>n</i> = 43) verbal sexual aggression, 46% (<i>n</i> = 46) unwanted sexual attention, and 3.2% (<i>n</i> = 3) sexual assault. Moderate to very high distress was exhibited by 26% (<i>n</i> = 26) of respondents, and 71% (<i>n</i> = 71) exhibited moderate to high emotional exhaustion.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>As the target participants were occupational therapists, consumer and community involvement was not sought.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study has demonstrated the exposure of occupational therapists to risks when visiting clients in their homes and identifies the need for risk management, training, and support for occupational therapists working in this environment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational therapists often visit people in their own homes to assess their needs and provide interventions. The home is an important environment as this is where functional activities take place. However, occupational therapists can be at risk of workplace violence from clients and their families, especially if they visit clients alone. Clients may be upset and frustrated by their situations and could strike out. We know very little about workplace violence experienced by occupational therapists, and this study used an online survey to explore how commonly this occurs, the type of incidents experienced, the actions that occupational therapists took following the incident, and how these experiences affected their well-being. We found that workplace violence included verbal attacks and physical and sexual violence. Overall, 76.2% of participants reported any kind of violence. The most frequent type of violence was verbal abuse followed by unwanted sexual attention, verbal sexual abuse, and physical violence with and without objects. Three participants reported a sexual assault. However, fewer participants took actions following the incidents such as reporting it informally or formally. This means that workplace violence is likely to be underreported by occupational therapists. We also found that occupational therapists who were exposed to workplace violence reported higher distress, higher cynicism, and lower professional accomplishment, suggesting a risk of burnout. As employers are required to protect the health and safety of their employees, these findings are very important, and the occupational therapy profession should also address them.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 工作场所暴力是许多医疗专业人员的常见经历。然而,人们对职业治疗师的经历却知之甚少,尤其是那些到居民家中进行家访的职业治疗师。家访是许多职业治疗师执业的基本组成部分,通常是在职业治疗师独自一人的情况下进行的。本研究旨在探讨这部分职业治疗师的经历、他们对工作场所暴力(如举报)的反应,以及他们的经历对其健康的影响。 研究方法 通过新南威尔士州卫生服务机构和澳大利亚职业治疗机构在职业治疗师中分发了一份横向在线调查,并在 Twitter、LinkedIn 和 Facebook 上进行了滚雪球式抽样和链接。该调查收集了有关人口统计学、工作组织、工作场所暴力暴露以及应对策略等方面的信息。幸福感采用简略马斯拉赫倦怠量表和凯斯勒心理压力量表进行测量。 结果 共收回 101 份调查问卷:97%(n = 97)为女性,平均年龄为 39 岁,52%(n = 52)位于省会城市,大多数人从事残疾人护理工作(47%,n = 47)或老年护理工作(46%,n = 46),并从事全职工作(60%,n = 60)。只有 5%(n=5)的人表示他们从未单独工作过。在至少偶尔经历过暴力的人中,74%(n = 74)报告受到过言语攻击,27%(n = 27)受到过来自客户或家庭成员的身体攻击,20%(n = 20)受到过使用物体的身体攻击,43%(n = 43)受到过言语性攻击,46%(n = 46)受到过不必要的性关注,3.2%(n = 3)受到过性攻击。26%(n=26)的受访者表现出中度到极度痛苦,71%(n=71)的受访者表现出中度到高度情绪衰竭。 消费者和社区参与 由于目标参与者是职业治疗师,因此没有寻求消费者和社区的参与。 结论 本研究表明,职业治疗师在对客户进行家访时会面临风险,因此需要对在这种环境中工作的职业治疗师进行风险管理、培训和支持。 简明扼要 职业治疗师经常到患者家中探访,评估他们的需求并提供干预措施。家庭是一个重要的环境,因为这里是进行功能活动的地方。然而,职业治疗师可能会面临来自客户及其家人的工作场所暴力风险,尤其是当他们单独探访客户时。客户可能会对自己的处境感到不安和沮丧,并可能出手相向。我们对职业治疗师所经历的工作场所暴力知之甚少,本研究采用在线调查的方式来探讨这种情况的发生频率、所经历事件的类型、职业治疗师在事件发生后所采取的行动,以及这些经历对他们福祉的影响。我们发现,工作场所暴力包括语言攻击、身体暴力和性暴力。总体而言,76.2% 的参与者报告了任何类型的暴力。最常见的暴力类型是口头辱骂,其次是不受欢迎的性关注、口头性辱骂以及使用或不使用物品的身体暴力。三名参与者报告了性侵犯。然而,在事件发生后采取行动(如非正式或正式报告)的参与者较少。这意味着职业治疗师对工作场所暴力的报告可能不足。我们还发现,遭受过工作场所暴力的职业治疗师报告了更高的痛苦、更高的愤世嫉俗情绪和更低的职业成就感,这表明他们有职业倦怠的风险。由于雇主必须保护员工的健康和安全,因此这些发现非常重要,职业治疗师行业也应关注这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Workplace violence experienced by occupational therapists who visit people in their own homes

Workplace violence experienced by occupational therapists who visit people in their own homes

Background

Workplace violence is a common experience for many health professionals. However, little is known about the experience of occupational therapists, specifically those that visit people in their own homes, and experience violence in that context. Home visiting is a fundamental component of practice for many occupational therapists and often takes place with the occupational therapist being alone. This study aimed to explore the experience of this group of occupational therapists, their responses to workplace violence such as reporting, and the impact of their experience on their wellbeing.

Method

A cross-sectional online survey was distributed among occupational therapists via NSW Health services and Occupational Therapy Australia with snowball sampling and links on Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook. The survey gathered information on demographics, work organisation, exposure to workplace violence, and strategies used to respond to this. Wellbeing was measured using the Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale.

Results

A total of 101 surveys were returned: 97% (n = 97) were female, the mean age was 39 years, 52% (n = 52) were located in capital cities, and most worked in disability care (47%, n = 47) or aged care (46%, n = 46) and worked full time (60%, n = 60). Only 5% (n = 5) identified that they never worked alone. Of those who experienced violence at least occasionally, 74% (n = 74) reported verbal aggression, 27% (n = 27) physical aggression from clients or family members, 20% (n = 20) physical aggression using objects, 43% (n = 43) verbal sexual aggression, 46% (n = 46) unwanted sexual attention, and 3.2% (n = 3) sexual assault. Moderate to very high distress was exhibited by 26% (n = 26) of respondents, and 71% (n = 71) exhibited moderate to high emotional exhaustion.

Consumer and Community Involvement

As the target participants were occupational therapists, consumer and community involvement was not sought.

Conclusion

This study has demonstrated the exposure of occupational therapists to risks when visiting clients in their homes and identifies the need for risk management, training, and support for occupational therapists working in this environment.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Occupational therapists often visit people in their own homes to assess their needs and provide interventions. The home is an important environment as this is where functional activities take place. However, occupational therapists can be at risk of workplace violence from clients and their families, especially if they visit clients alone. Clients may be upset and frustrated by their situations and could strike out. We know very little about workplace violence experienced by occupational therapists, and this study used an online survey to explore how commonly this occurs, the type of incidents experienced, the actions that occupational therapists took following the incident, and how these experiences affected their well-being. We found that workplace violence included verbal attacks and physical and sexual violence. Overall, 76.2% of participants reported any kind of violence. The most frequent type of violence was verbal abuse followed by unwanted sexual attention, verbal sexual abuse, and physical violence with and without objects. Three participants reported a sexual assault. However, fewer participants took actions following the incidents such as reporting it informally or formally. This means that workplace violence is likely to be underreported by occupational therapists. We also found that occupational therapists who were exposed to workplace violence reported higher distress, higher cynicism, and lower professional accomplishment, suggesting a risk of burnout. As employers are required to protect the health and safety of their employees, these findings are very important, and the occupational therapy profession should also address them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信