{"title":"早期收获的果园草(Dactylis glomerata L.)的影响青贮降低精料投入对奶牛生产性能、产奶量和氮平衡的影响","authors":"Akira Yajima, Makoto Miyaji, Takanori Yagi, Yuka Shinoda, Masaya Komatsu, Shingo Tada, Sadaki Asakuma, Yasuko Ueda","doi":"10.1111/asj.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We evaluated the effects of feeding early-harvested first-cut orchardgrass (<i>Dactylis glomerata</i> L.) silage (EGS) instead of silage harvested at a more mature stage (LGS) while increasing forage-to-concentrate ratio on feed intake, behavior, milk production, milk fatty acids profile, and N balance in dairy cows. Six multiparous cows were used in a crossover design with two isoenergetic and isonitrogenous dietary treatments: (1) ET, containing EGS (51.5% dry matter, DM), ear corn silage (ECS; 20% DM), and concentrate (28.5% DM), and (2) LT, containing LGS (36.5% DM), ECS (20% DM), and concentrate (43.5% DM). Compared to LT, ET maintained DM intake (DMI), milk yield (fat-corrected milk [FCM] and energy-corrected milk [ECM]), and feed efficiency (FCM/DMI and ECM/DMI) and increased eating and ruminating times and milk fat content with a lower concentration of C18:1 trans-10; however, it did not affect the concentration of de novo fatty acid and milk fat yield. ET did not affect fecal, urinary, retained, or productive N compared to LT but decreased milk N. The results indicate that feeding EGS instead of LGS could be a good approach to reduce concentrate supplementation without adversely affecting milk production and N efficiency; however, it could decrease milk N utilization.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7890,"journal":{"name":"Animal Science Journal","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Early-Harvested Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) Silage With Reducing the Concentrate Input on Dairy Cow Performance, Milk Production, and N Balance\",\"authors\":\"Akira Yajima, Makoto Miyaji, Takanori Yagi, Yuka Shinoda, Masaya Komatsu, Shingo Tada, Sadaki Asakuma, Yasuko Ueda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/asj.70054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>We evaluated the effects of feeding early-harvested first-cut orchardgrass (<i>Dactylis glomerata</i> L.) silage (EGS) instead of silage harvested at a more mature stage (LGS) while increasing forage-to-concentrate ratio on feed intake, behavior, milk production, milk fatty acids profile, and N balance in dairy cows. Six multiparous cows were used in a crossover design with two isoenergetic and isonitrogenous dietary treatments: (1) ET, containing EGS (51.5% dry matter, DM), ear corn silage (ECS; 20% DM), and concentrate (28.5% DM), and (2) LT, containing LGS (36.5% DM), ECS (20% DM), and concentrate (43.5% DM). Compared to LT, ET maintained DM intake (DMI), milk yield (fat-corrected milk [FCM] and energy-corrected milk [ECM]), and feed efficiency (FCM/DMI and ECM/DMI) and increased eating and ruminating times and milk fat content with a lower concentration of C18:1 trans-10; however, it did not affect the concentration of de novo fatty acid and milk fat yield. ET did not affect fecal, urinary, retained, or productive N compared to LT but decreased milk N. The results indicate that feeding EGS instead of LGS could be a good approach to reduce concentrate supplementation without adversely affecting milk production and N efficiency; however, it could decrease milk N utilization.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Science Journal\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Science Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asj.70054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asj.70054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Early-Harvested Orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) Silage With Reducing the Concentrate Input on Dairy Cow Performance, Milk Production, and N Balance
We evaluated the effects of feeding early-harvested first-cut orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) silage (EGS) instead of silage harvested at a more mature stage (LGS) while increasing forage-to-concentrate ratio on feed intake, behavior, milk production, milk fatty acids profile, and N balance in dairy cows. Six multiparous cows were used in a crossover design with two isoenergetic and isonitrogenous dietary treatments: (1) ET, containing EGS (51.5% dry matter, DM), ear corn silage (ECS; 20% DM), and concentrate (28.5% DM), and (2) LT, containing LGS (36.5% DM), ECS (20% DM), and concentrate (43.5% DM). Compared to LT, ET maintained DM intake (DMI), milk yield (fat-corrected milk [FCM] and energy-corrected milk [ECM]), and feed efficiency (FCM/DMI and ECM/DMI) and increased eating and ruminating times and milk fat content with a lower concentration of C18:1 trans-10; however, it did not affect the concentration of de novo fatty acid and milk fat yield. ET did not affect fecal, urinary, retained, or productive N compared to LT but decreased milk N. The results indicate that feeding EGS instead of LGS could be a good approach to reduce concentrate supplementation without adversely affecting milk production and N efficiency; however, it could decrease milk N utilization.
期刊介绍:
Animal Science Journal (a continuation of Animal Science and Technology) is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Animal Science (JSAS) and publishes Original Research Articles (full papers and rapid communications) in English in all fields of animal and poultry science: genetics and breeding, genetic engineering, reproduction, embryo manipulation, nutrition, feeds and feeding, physiology, anatomy, environment and behavior, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, and livestock economics. Animal Science Journal will invite Review Articles in consultations with Editors. Submission to the Journal is open to those who are interested in animal science.