颈部清扫对cN0腮腺癌隐匿淋巴结转移的预后影响及危险因素分析

Yudong Ning, Yixuan Song, Yuqin He, Han Li, Shaoyan Liu
{"title":"颈部清扫对cN0腮腺癌隐匿淋巴结转移的预后影响及危险因素分析","authors":"Yudong Ning,&nbsp;Yixuan Song,&nbsp;Yuqin He,&nbsp;Han Li,&nbsp;Shaoyan Liu","doi":"10.1002/cai2.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to explore the prognostic effect of neck dissection and to identify risk factors associated with occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) in clinically node-negative (cN0) parotid carcinoma (PC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on cN0 PC patients who underwent primary surgery at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, between 2012 and 2022. Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analyses were carried out to evaluate differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing neck dissection and those who did not. Clinical variables associated with OLNM in the neck dissection group were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 472 PC patients, 133 were classified as cN0 following initial surgery, of whom 75 (56.4%) underwent neck dissection. Pathological lymph node metastases were confirmed in 20 (26.7%) patients in the neck dissection cohort. Poor tumor differentiation was identified as an independent risk factor for OLNM (<i>p</i> = 0.017). No significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the no-neck dissection and neck dissection groups for patients with low-grade or well-differentiated tumors (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). However, neck dissection was associated with significantly prolonged PFS in patients with tumors of higher grade or low to moderate differentiation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Notably, OS did not improve with neck dissection across all subgroups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Poorly differentiated tumors in cN0 PC are independently associated with a higher risk of OLNM. While prophylactic neck dissection may enhance PFS in patients with higher grade or poorly differentiated tumors, it does not confer a survival benefit in terms of OS. These findings support the selective use of neck dissection in patients with higher risk tumor profiles.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100212,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Innovation","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cai2.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Effect of Neck Dissection and Risk Factors for Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Parotid Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Yudong Ning,&nbsp;Yixuan Song,&nbsp;Yuqin He,&nbsp;Han Li,&nbsp;Shaoyan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cai2.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to explore the prognostic effect of neck dissection and to identify risk factors associated with occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) in clinically node-negative (cN0) parotid carcinoma (PC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective analysis was conducted on cN0 PC patients who underwent primary surgery at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, between 2012 and 2022. Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analyses were carried out to evaluate differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing neck dissection and those who did not. Clinical variables associated with OLNM in the neck dissection group were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among 472 PC patients, 133 were classified as cN0 following initial surgery, of whom 75 (56.4%) underwent neck dissection. Pathological lymph node metastases were confirmed in 20 (26.7%) patients in the neck dissection cohort. Poor tumor differentiation was identified as an independent risk factor for OLNM (<i>p</i> = 0.017). No significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the no-neck dissection and neck dissection groups for patients with low-grade or well-differentiated tumors (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). However, neck dissection was associated with significantly prolonged PFS in patients with tumors of higher grade or low to moderate differentiation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Notably, OS did not improve with neck dissection across all subgroups (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Poorly differentiated tumors in cN0 PC are independently associated with a higher risk of OLNM. While prophylactic neck dissection may enhance PFS in patients with higher grade or poorly differentiated tumors, it does not confer a survival benefit in terms of OS. These findings support the selective use of neck dissection in patients with higher risk tumor profiles.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Innovation\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cai2.70007\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cai2.70007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cai2.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨颈部清扫对临床淋巴结阴性(cN0)腮腺癌(PC)预后的影响,并探讨与隐匿淋巴结转移(OLNM)相关的危险因素。方法回顾性分析2012年至2022年在中国医学科学院国家肿瘤中心/肿瘤医院接受原发性手术的cN0例PC患者。Kaplan-Meier (KM)生存分析用于评估接受和未接受颈部剥离的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的差异。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析评估与颈部清扫组OLNM相关的临床变量。结果472例PC患者中,133例术后为cN0,其中75例(56.4%)行颈部清扫术。20例(26.7%)颈部夹层患者确诊有病理性淋巴结转移。肿瘤分化差被认为是OLNM的独立危险因素(p = 0.017)。低分级、高分化肿瘤患者无颈清扫组与无颈清扫组PFS、OS差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。然而,在肿瘤级别较高或中低分化的患者中,颈部清扫与PFS显著延长相关(p < 0.05)。值得注意的是,在所有亚组中,颈部清扫并没有改善OS (p > 0.05)。结论cN0型PC中低分化肿瘤与OLNM的高危险性独立相关。虽然预防性颈部清扫可能会提高高级别或低分化肿瘤患者的PFS,但就OS而言,它并没有带来生存益处。这些发现支持在高风险肿瘤患者中选择性使用颈部清扫术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prognostic Effect of Neck Dissection and Risk Factors for Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Parotid Carcinoma

Prognostic Effect of Neck Dissection and Risk Factors for Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Parotid Carcinoma

Objective

This study aimed to explore the prognostic effect of neck dissection and to identify risk factors associated with occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) in clinically node-negative (cN0) parotid carcinoma (PC).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on cN0 PC patients who underwent primary surgery at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, between 2012 and 2022. Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analyses were carried out to evaluate differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing neck dissection and those who did not. Clinical variables associated with OLNM in the neck dissection group were assessed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results

Among 472 PC patients, 133 were classified as cN0 following initial surgery, of whom 75 (56.4%) underwent neck dissection. Pathological lymph node metastases were confirmed in 20 (26.7%) patients in the neck dissection cohort. Poor tumor differentiation was identified as an independent risk factor for OLNM (p = 0.017). No significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the no-neck dissection and neck dissection groups for patients with low-grade or well-differentiated tumors (p > 0.05). However, neck dissection was associated with significantly prolonged PFS in patients with tumors of higher grade or low to moderate differentiation (p < 0.05). Notably, OS did not improve with neck dissection across all subgroups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Poorly differentiated tumors in cN0 PC are independently associated with a higher risk of OLNM. While prophylactic neck dissection may enhance PFS in patients with higher grade or poorly differentiated tumors, it does not confer a survival benefit in terms of OS. These findings support the selective use of neck dissection in patients with higher risk tumor profiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信