{"title":"全球环境可持续性:经济、社会、治理(ECON-SG)因素、气候政策不确定性(EPU)和碳排放的作用","authors":"Cem Işık, Serdar Ongan, Hasibul Islam","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Raising ESG standards and reducing climate policy uncertainty can directly determine CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Therefore, this study examines the effects of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG), and climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>E) on a global scale from 2001 to 2020. The ARDL and ARDL bound tests are employed. The <i>F-statistics</i> suggest a stable long-run relationship among the variables, indicating that the estimated coefficients are robust. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors increase CO<sub>2</sub>E, social factors mitigate. Based on these results, the interactions of economic, social, governance, and climate policy with global (total) environmental problems can be interpreted as follows. <i>(i)</i> Energy consumption driven by global economic growth and industrial production based mainly on fossil fuels increases CO<sub>2</sub>E. This result may also indicate unsustainable economic growth. <i>(ii)</i> Despite unsustainable global economic growth, increasing social awareness, education level, and life expectancy can be interpreted as improving society's environmental awareness and reducing CO<sub>2</sub>E. Therefore, policymakers must harmonize their global economic and social policies conflicting with CO<sub>2</sub>E. In fact, this result may indicate that economic growth that does not support and develop social policies cannot positively contribute to the environment because the ultimate point of economic policies and growth is people in social life. <i>(iii)</i> The insignificant impact of climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub>E can be interpreted because of an international lack of coordination in global climate policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 3","pages":"851 - 866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global environmental sustainability: the role of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG) factors, climate policy uncertainty (EPU) and carbon emissions\",\"authors\":\"Cem Işık, Serdar Ongan, Hasibul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Raising ESG standards and reducing climate policy uncertainty can directly determine CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Therefore, this study examines the effects of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG), and climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>E) on a global scale from 2001 to 2020. The ARDL and ARDL bound tests are employed. The <i>F-statistics</i> suggest a stable long-run relationship among the variables, indicating that the estimated coefficients are robust. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors increase CO<sub>2</sub>E, social factors mitigate. Based on these results, the interactions of economic, social, governance, and climate policy with global (total) environmental problems can be interpreted as follows. <i>(i)</i> Energy consumption driven by global economic growth and industrial production based mainly on fossil fuels increases CO<sub>2</sub>E. This result may also indicate unsustainable economic growth. <i>(ii)</i> Despite unsustainable global economic growth, increasing social awareness, education level, and life expectancy can be interpreted as improving society's environmental awareness and reducing CO<sub>2</sub>E. Therefore, policymakers must harmonize their global economic and social policies conflicting with CO<sub>2</sub>E. In fact, this result may indicate that economic growth that does not support and develop social policies cannot positively contribute to the environment because the ultimate point of economic policies and growth is people in social life. <i>(iii)</i> The insignificant impact of climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub>E can be interpreted because of an international lack of coordination in global climate policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"851 - 866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global environmental sustainability: the role of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG) factors, climate policy uncertainty (EPU) and carbon emissions
Raising ESG standards and reducing climate policy uncertainty can directly determine CO2 emissions. Therefore, this study examines the effects of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG), and climate policy uncertainty on CO2 emissions (CO2E) on a global scale from 2001 to 2020. The ARDL and ARDL bound tests are employed. The F-statistics suggest a stable long-run relationship among the variables, indicating that the estimated coefficients are robust. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors increase CO2E, social factors mitigate. Based on these results, the interactions of economic, social, governance, and climate policy with global (total) environmental problems can be interpreted as follows. (i) Energy consumption driven by global economic growth and industrial production based mainly on fossil fuels increases CO2E. This result may also indicate unsustainable economic growth. (ii) Despite unsustainable global economic growth, increasing social awareness, education level, and life expectancy can be interpreted as improving society's environmental awareness and reducing CO2E. Therefore, policymakers must harmonize their global economic and social policies conflicting with CO2E. In fact, this result may indicate that economic growth that does not support and develop social policies cannot positively contribute to the environment because the ultimate point of economic policies and growth is people in social life. (iii) The insignificant impact of climate policy uncertainty on CO2E can be interpreted because of an international lack of coordination in global climate policies.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.