全球环境可持续性:经济、社会、治理(ECON-SG)因素、气候政策不确定性(EPU)和碳排放的作用

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cem Işık, Serdar Ongan, Hasibul Islam
{"title":"全球环境可持续性:经济、社会、治理(ECON-SG)因素、气候政策不确定性(EPU)和碳排放的作用","authors":"Cem Işık,&nbsp;Serdar Ongan,&nbsp;Hasibul Islam","doi":"10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Raising ESG standards and reducing climate policy uncertainty can directly determine CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Therefore, this study examines the effects of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG), and climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>E) on a global scale from 2001 to 2020. The ARDL and ARDL bound tests are employed. The <i>F-statistics</i> suggest a stable long-run relationship among the variables, indicating that the estimated coefficients are robust. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors increase CO<sub>2</sub>E, social factors mitigate. Based on these results, the interactions of economic, social, governance, and climate policy with global (total) environmental problems can be interpreted as follows. <i>(i)</i> Energy consumption driven by global economic growth and industrial production based mainly on fossil fuels increases CO<sub>2</sub>E. This result may also indicate unsustainable economic growth. <i>(ii)</i> Despite unsustainable global economic growth, increasing social awareness, education level, and life expectancy can be interpreted as improving society's environmental awareness and reducing CO<sub>2</sub>E. Therefore, policymakers must harmonize their global economic and social policies conflicting with CO<sub>2</sub>E. In fact, this result may indicate that economic growth that does not support and develop social policies cannot positively contribute to the environment because the ultimate point of economic policies and growth is people in social life. <i>(iii)</i> The insignificant impact of climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub>E can be interpreted because of an international lack of coordination in global climate policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 3","pages":"851 - 866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global environmental sustainability: the role of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG) factors, climate policy uncertainty (EPU) and carbon emissions\",\"authors\":\"Cem Işık,&nbsp;Serdar Ongan,&nbsp;Hasibul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Raising ESG standards and reducing climate policy uncertainty can directly determine CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Therefore, this study examines the effects of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG), and climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions (CO<sub>2</sub>E) on a global scale from 2001 to 2020. The ARDL and ARDL bound tests are employed. The <i>F-statistics</i> suggest a stable long-run relationship among the variables, indicating that the estimated coefficients are robust. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors increase CO<sub>2</sub>E, social factors mitigate. Based on these results, the interactions of economic, social, governance, and climate policy with global (total) environmental problems can be interpreted as follows. <i>(i)</i> Energy consumption driven by global economic growth and industrial production based mainly on fossil fuels increases CO<sub>2</sub>E. This result may also indicate unsustainable economic growth. <i>(ii)</i> Despite unsustainable global economic growth, increasing social awareness, education level, and life expectancy can be interpreted as improving society's environmental awareness and reducing CO<sub>2</sub>E. Therefore, policymakers must harmonize their global economic and social policies conflicting with CO<sub>2</sub>E. In fact, this result may indicate that economic growth that does not support and develop social policies cannot positively contribute to the environment because the ultimate point of economic policies and growth is people in social life. <i>(iii)</i> The insignificant impact of climate policy uncertainty on CO<sub>2</sub>E can be interpreted because of an international lack of coordination in global climate policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"851 - 866\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-024-01675-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高ESG标准和减少气候政策的不确定性可以直接决定二氧化碳的排放。因此,本研究考察了经济、社会、治理(ECON-SG)和气候政策不确定性对2001 - 2020年全球范围内二氧化碳排放(CO2E)的影响。采用ARDL和ARDL结合试验。f统计量表明变量之间存在稳定的长期关系,表明估计系数是稳健的。实证结果表明,虽然经济因素增加了二氧化碳当量,但社会因素减缓了二氧化碳当量。基于这些结果,经济、社会、治理和气候政策与全球(总)环境问题的相互作用可以解释如下。(i)全球经济增长和主要以化石燃料为基础的工业生产所驱动的能源消费增加了二氧化碳当量。这一结果也可能表明经济增长不可持续。(ii)尽管全球经济增长不可持续,但社会意识、教育水平和预期寿命的提高可以解释为社会环境意识的提高和二氧化碳当量的减少。因此,政策制定者必须协调与二氧化碳当量相冲突的全球经济和社会政策。事实上,这一结果可能表明,不支持和发展社会政策的经济增长不能对环境做出积极贡献,因为经济政策和增长的最终目的是社会生活中的人。(iii)气候政策不确定性对二氧化碳当量的影响不显著,可以解释为全球气候政策缺乏国际协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global environmental sustainability: the role of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG) factors, climate policy uncertainty (EPU) and carbon emissions

Raising ESG standards and reducing climate policy uncertainty can directly determine CO2 emissions. Therefore, this study examines the effects of economic, social, governance (ECON-SG), and climate policy uncertainty on CO2 emissions (CO2E) on a global scale from 2001 to 2020. The ARDL and ARDL bound tests are employed. The F-statistics suggest a stable long-run relationship among the variables, indicating that the estimated coefficients are robust. Empirical findings reveal that while economic factors increase CO2E, social factors mitigate. Based on these results, the interactions of economic, social, governance, and climate policy with global (total) environmental problems can be interpreted as follows. (i) Energy consumption driven by global economic growth and industrial production based mainly on fossil fuels increases CO2E. This result may also indicate unsustainable economic growth. (ii) Despite unsustainable global economic growth, increasing social awareness, education level, and life expectancy can be interpreted as improving society's environmental awareness and reducing CO2E. Therefore, policymakers must harmonize their global economic and social policies conflicting with CO2E. In fact, this result may indicate that economic growth that does not support and develop social policies cannot positively contribute to the environment because the ultimate point of economic policies and growth is people in social life. (iii) The insignificant impact of climate policy uncertainty on CO2E can be interpreted because of an international lack of coordination in global climate policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信