揭示BMI和骨关节炎之间的中介机制:孟德尔随机化和中介分析

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hui Yu, Junxiang Wang, Xin Xu, Hui Li, Junfei Guo
{"title":"揭示BMI和骨关节炎之间的中介机制:孟德尔随机化和中介分析","authors":"Hui Yu,&nbsp;Junxiang Wang,&nbsp;Xin Xu,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Junfei Guo","doi":"10.1007/s40520-025-03035-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite well-documented associations between Body mass index (BMI) and Osteoarthritis (OA), the specific biological pathways and mediators involved remain poorly understood. This study aims to explore mediators through which BMI influences OA risk, particularly knee osteoarthritis (KOA), using Mendelian Randomization (MR) and mediation analysis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a two-step MR approach with data from the IEU OpenGWAS and FinnGen version 7 databases. BMI (<i>N</i> = 322,154) was the primary exposure, with knee disorders (KD), total bone mineral density (TBMD), metabolic disorders (MD), and anxiety disorders (AD) as potential mediators. Outcomes included KOA (<i>N</i> = 22,347), hip OA (HOA) (<i>N</i> = 11,989), and all OA (AllOA) (<i>N</i> = 50,508). Univariate MR evaluated causal relationships, followed by multivariate MR to quantify mediation effects. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate robustness, while horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity were assessed using MR-Egger intercept and Cochran’s Q statistic.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>BMI significantly increased the risk of KOA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56–2.56), HOA (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.40–2.98), and AllOA (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.41–1.95). KD and TBMD significantly mediated the effect on KOA, with mediation proportions of 20.89% and 3.59%, respectively. MD and AD showed no significant effects. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings. Horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests indicated minimal evidence of bias, supporting the reliability of our results.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BMI increases OA risk, with KD and TBMD partially mediating the effect, particularly for KOA. The direct impact of BMI remains predominant, emphasizing the importance of weight reduction, joint protection, and physical activity as preventive measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03035-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revealing the mediating mechanisms between BMI and osteoarthritis: a Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hui Yu,&nbsp;Junxiang Wang,&nbsp;Xin Xu,&nbsp;Hui Li,&nbsp;Junfei Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40520-025-03035-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite well-documented associations between Body mass index (BMI) and Osteoarthritis (OA), the specific biological pathways and mediators involved remain poorly understood. This study aims to explore mediators through which BMI influences OA risk, particularly knee osteoarthritis (KOA), using Mendelian Randomization (MR) and mediation analysis.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used a two-step MR approach with data from the IEU OpenGWAS and FinnGen version 7 databases. BMI (<i>N</i> = 322,154) was the primary exposure, with knee disorders (KD), total bone mineral density (TBMD), metabolic disorders (MD), and anxiety disorders (AD) as potential mediators. Outcomes included KOA (<i>N</i> = 22,347), hip OA (HOA) (<i>N</i> = 11,989), and all OA (AllOA) (<i>N</i> = 50,508). Univariate MR evaluated causal relationships, followed by multivariate MR to quantify mediation effects. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate robustness, while horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity were assessed using MR-Egger intercept and Cochran’s Q statistic.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>BMI significantly increased the risk of KOA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56–2.56), HOA (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.40–2.98), and AllOA (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.41–1.95). KD and TBMD significantly mediated the effect on KOA, with mediation proportions of 20.89% and 3.59%, respectively. MD and AD showed no significant effects. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings. Horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests indicated minimal evidence of bias, supporting the reliability of our results.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>BMI increases OA risk, with KD and TBMD partially mediating the effect, particularly for KOA. The direct impact of BMI remains predominant, emphasizing the importance of weight reduction, joint protection, and physical activity as preventive measures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-025-03035-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03035-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-025-03035-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管身体质量指数(BMI)与骨关节炎(OA)之间存在着充分的关联,但对其中的特定生物学途径和介质仍知之甚少。本研究旨在通过孟德尔随机化(MR)和中介分析,探索BMI影响OA风险的中介因素,特别是膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)。方法采用两步MR方法,数据来自IEU OpenGWAS和FinnGen version 7数据库。BMI (N = 322,154)是主要暴露因素,膝关节疾病(KD)、总骨密度(TBMD)、代谢疾病(MD)和焦虑症(AD)是潜在的中介因素。结果包括KOA (N = 22,347),髋关节OA (N = 11,989)和所有OA (N = 50,508)。单变量磁共振评估因果关系,随后进行多变量磁共振量化中介效应。进行多重敏感性分析以验证稳健性,同时使用MR-Egger截距和Cochran 's Q统计量评估水平多效性和异质性。结果bmi显著增加KOA(比值比[OR]: 2.00, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.56 ~ 2.56)、HOA(比值比:2.05,95% CI: 1.40 ~ 2.98)和AllOA(比值比:1.66,95% CI: 1.41 ~ 1.95)的风险。KD和TBMD对KOA的调节作用显著,分别为20.89%和3.59%。MD和AD无明显影响。敏感性分析支持这些发现的稳健性。水平多效性和异质性试验显示最小的偏倚证据,支持我们结果的可靠性。结论bmi增加OA风险,KD和TBMD在其中起部分作用,尤其是KOA。BMI的直接影响仍然占主导地位,强调了减肥、关节保护和体育活动作为预防措施的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revealing the mediating mechanisms between BMI and osteoarthritis: a Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis

Background

Despite well-documented associations between Body mass index (BMI) and Osteoarthritis (OA), the specific biological pathways and mediators involved remain poorly understood. This study aims to explore mediators through which BMI influences OA risk, particularly knee osteoarthritis (KOA), using Mendelian Randomization (MR) and mediation analysis.

Methods

We used a two-step MR approach with data from the IEU OpenGWAS and FinnGen version 7 databases. BMI (N = 322,154) was the primary exposure, with knee disorders (KD), total bone mineral density (TBMD), metabolic disorders (MD), and anxiety disorders (AD) as potential mediators. Outcomes included KOA (N = 22,347), hip OA (HOA) (N = 11,989), and all OA (AllOA) (N = 50,508). Univariate MR evaluated causal relationships, followed by multivariate MR to quantify mediation effects. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate robustness, while horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity were assessed using MR-Egger intercept and Cochran’s Q statistic.

Results

BMI significantly increased the risk of KOA (odds ratio [OR]: 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56–2.56), HOA (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.40–2.98), and AllOA (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.41–1.95). KD and TBMD significantly mediated the effect on KOA, with mediation proportions of 20.89% and 3.59%, respectively. MD and AD showed no significant effects. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings. Horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity tests indicated minimal evidence of bias, supporting the reliability of our results.

Conclusions

BMI increases OA risk, with KD and TBMD partially mediating the effect, particularly for KOA. The direct impact of BMI remains predominant, emphasizing the importance of weight reduction, joint protection, and physical activity as preventive measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信