一种不使用无应力试样测量等双轴残余应力的仪器锐压痕方法

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Guangjian Peng, Saifei Li, Liang Zhang, Peijian Chen, Wei Xiong, Taihua Zhang
{"title":"一种不使用无应力试样测量等双轴残余应力的仪器锐压痕方法","authors":"Guangjian Peng,&nbsp;Saifei Li,&nbsp;Liang Zhang,&nbsp;Peijian Chen,&nbsp;Wei Xiong,&nbsp;Taihua Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10338-024-00534-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The presence of residual stresses in materials or engineering structures can significantly influence their mechanical performance. Accurate measurement of residual stresses is of great importance to ensure their in-service reliability. Although numerous instrumented indentation methods have been proposed to evaluate residual stresses, the majority of them require a stress-free reference sample as a comparison benchmark, thereby limiting their applicability in scenarios where obtaining stress-free reference samples is challenging. In this work, through a number of finite element simulations, it was found that the loading exponent of the loading load-depth curve and the recovered depth during unloading are insensitive to residual stresses. The loading curve of the stress-free specimen was virtually reconstructed using such stress-insensitive parameters extracted from the load-depth curves of the stressed state, thus eliminating the requirement for stress-free reference samples. The residual stress was then correlated with the fractional change in loading work between stressed and stress-free loading curves through dimensional analysis and finite element simulations. Based on this correlation, an instrumented sharp indentation method for measuring equibiaxial residual stress without requiring a stress-free specimen was established. Both numerical and experimental verifications were carried out to demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the newly proposed method. The maximum relative error and absolute error in measured residual stresses are typically within ± 20% and ± 20 MPa, respectively.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50892,"journal":{"name":"Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica","volume":"38 2","pages":"290 - 299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Instrumented Sharp Indentation Method for Measuring Equibiaxial Residual Stress without Using Stress-Free Specimens\",\"authors\":\"Guangjian Peng,&nbsp;Saifei Li,&nbsp;Liang Zhang,&nbsp;Peijian Chen,&nbsp;Wei Xiong,&nbsp;Taihua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10338-024-00534-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The presence of residual stresses in materials or engineering structures can significantly influence their mechanical performance. Accurate measurement of residual stresses is of great importance to ensure their in-service reliability. Although numerous instrumented indentation methods have been proposed to evaluate residual stresses, the majority of them require a stress-free reference sample as a comparison benchmark, thereby limiting their applicability in scenarios where obtaining stress-free reference samples is challenging. In this work, through a number of finite element simulations, it was found that the loading exponent of the loading load-depth curve and the recovered depth during unloading are insensitive to residual stresses. The loading curve of the stress-free specimen was virtually reconstructed using such stress-insensitive parameters extracted from the load-depth curves of the stressed state, thus eliminating the requirement for stress-free reference samples. The residual stress was then correlated with the fractional change in loading work between stressed and stress-free loading curves through dimensional analysis and finite element simulations. Based on this correlation, an instrumented sharp indentation method for measuring equibiaxial residual stress without requiring a stress-free specimen was established. Both numerical and experimental verifications were carried out to demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the newly proposed method. The maximum relative error and absolute error in measured residual stresses are typically within ± 20% and ± 20 MPa, respectively.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"290 - 299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10338-024-00534-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10338-024-00534-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料或工程结构中残余应力的存在会显著影响其力学性能。残余应力的准确测量对保证其使用可靠性具有重要意义。虽然已经提出了许多仪器压痕方法来评估残余应力,但大多数方法都需要无应力参考样品作为比较基准,从而限制了它们在获得无应力参考样品具有挑战性的情况下的适用性。通过多次有限元模拟,发现加载-深度曲线的加载指数和卸载时的恢复深度对残余应力不敏感。利用从应力状态的荷载-深度曲线中提取的应力不敏感参数,虚拟重构了无应力试样的加载曲线,从而消除了对无应力参考试样的要求。通过量纲分析和有限元模拟,将残余应力与应力和无应力加载曲线之间加载功的分数变化相关联。基于这种相关性,建立了一种不需要无应力试样即可测量等双轴残余应力的仪器锐压痕方法。数值和实验验证了该方法的准确性和可靠性。测量残余应力的最大相对误差和绝对误差一般分别在±20%和±20mpa以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Instrumented Sharp Indentation Method for Measuring Equibiaxial Residual Stress without Using Stress-Free Specimens

The presence of residual stresses in materials or engineering structures can significantly influence their mechanical performance. Accurate measurement of residual stresses is of great importance to ensure their in-service reliability. Although numerous instrumented indentation methods have been proposed to evaluate residual stresses, the majority of them require a stress-free reference sample as a comparison benchmark, thereby limiting their applicability in scenarios where obtaining stress-free reference samples is challenging. In this work, through a number of finite element simulations, it was found that the loading exponent of the loading load-depth curve and the recovered depth during unloading are insensitive to residual stresses. The loading curve of the stress-free specimen was virtually reconstructed using such stress-insensitive parameters extracted from the load-depth curves of the stressed state, thus eliminating the requirement for stress-free reference samples. The residual stress was then correlated with the fractional change in loading work between stressed and stress-free loading curves through dimensional analysis and finite element simulations. Based on this correlation, an instrumented sharp indentation method for measuring equibiaxial residual stress without requiring a stress-free specimen was established. Both numerical and experimental verifications were carried out to demonstrate the accuracy and reliability of the newly proposed method. The maximum relative error and absolute error in measured residual stresses are typically within ± 20% and ± 20 MPa, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 物理-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
1088
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica aims to become the best journal of solid mechanics in China and a worldwide well-known one in the field of mechanics, by providing original, perspective and even breakthrough theories and methods for the research on solid mechanics. The Journal is devoted to the publication of research papers in English in all fields of solid-state mechanics and its related disciplines in science, technology and engineering, with a balanced coverage on analytical, experimental, numerical and applied investigations. Articles, Short Communications, Discussions on previously published papers, and invitation-based Reviews are published bimonthly. The maximum length of an article is 30 pages, including equations, figures and tables
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信