铬钼钢无缝储氢容器的淬火策略研究

IF 8.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Zhenquan Zhang , Kai Ma , Leyao Li , Wenzhu Peng , Jinyang Zheng
{"title":"铬钼钢无缝储氢容器的淬火策略研究","authors":"Zhenquan Zhang ,&nbsp;Kai Ma ,&nbsp;Leyao Li ,&nbsp;Wenzhu Peng ,&nbsp;Jinyang Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel are commonly used for hydrogen refueling stations, whereas due to high-pressure storage requirements and the resulting large wall thickness, conventional single-sided quenched vessels usually face poor uniformity of mechanical properties along the wall thickness after heat treatment. In response to this issue, double-sided quenching has been proposed as an improved solution, while single-sided quenching remains a practical option for vessels with thin wall thicknesses due to its simplicity and low cost. To date, there is a lack of systematic research to clearly define the applicable thickness ranges for single-sided and double-sided quenching of such vessels. In this study, seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel with a wall thickness of 44 mm underwent single-sided quenching and double-sided quenching, respectively. Specimens sampled from the cylinder of these vessels along the wall thickness were subjected to hardness tests and Charpy impact tests. Concurrently, the variations in temperature and phase along the wall thickness were analyzed through numerical simulation. Based on this, quenching strategies were developed by simulating the mechanical uniformity of vessels with different wall thicknesses. Results indicate that when subjected to single-sided quenching, both hardness and impact absorbed energy gradually decrease from the outer surface to the inner surface, while double-sided quenching results in a distinct V-shaped distribution of these properties. This difference is primarily attributed to the significant variations in cooling rates and resulting phase distributions between single-sided and double-sided quenching. To meet the maximum permissible hardness deviations specified in GB/T 44457, single-sided quenching is suitable for vessels with wall thicknesses not exceeding 40 mm and double-sided quenching is recommended for vessels with wall thicknesses between 40 mm and 60 mm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":337,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","volume":"124 ","pages":"Pages 280-289"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the quenching strategies for seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel\",\"authors\":\"Zhenquan Zhang ,&nbsp;Kai Ma ,&nbsp;Leyao Li ,&nbsp;Wenzhu Peng ,&nbsp;Jinyang Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel are commonly used for hydrogen refueling stations, whereas due to high-pressure storage requirements and the resulting large wall thickness, conventional single-sided quenched vessels usually face poor uniformity of mechanical properties along the wall thickness after heat treatment. In response to this issue, double-sided quenching has been proposed as an improved solution, while single-sided quenching remains a practical option for vessels with thin wall thicknesses due to its simplicity and low cost. To date, there is a lack of systematic research to clearly define the applicable thickness ranges for single-sided and double-sided quenching of such vessels. In this study, seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel with a wall thickness of 44 mm underwent single-sided quenching and double-sided quenching, respectively. Specimens sampled from the cylinder of these vessels along the wall thickness were subjected to hardness tests and Charpy impact tests. Concurrently, the variations in temperature and phase along the wall thickness were analyzed through numerical simulation. Based on this, quenching strategies were developed by simulating the mechanical uniformity of vessels with different wall thicknesses. Results indicate that when subjected to single-sided quenching, both hardness and impact absorbed energy gradually decrease from the outer surface to the inner surface, while double-sided quenching results in a distinct V-shaped distribution of these properties. This difference is primarily attributed to the significant variations in cooling rates and resulting phase distributions between single-sided and double-sided quenching. To meet the maximum permissible hardness deviations specified in GB/T 44457, single-sided quenching is suitable for vessels with wall thicknesses not exceeding 40 mm and double-sided quenching is recommended for vessels with wall thicknesses between 40 mm and 60 mm.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"volume\":\"124 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 280-289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925016180\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hydrogen Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319925016180","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加氢站通常采用Cr-Mo钢无缝储氢容器,而传统单面淬火容器由于储氢要求高压且壁厚较大,热处理后沿壁厚方向的力学性能均匀性较差。针对这一问题,双面淬火被提出作为一种改进的解决方案,而单面淬火由于其简单和低成本,对于薄壁厚的容器仍然是一种实用的选择。目前,对于此类容器单面和双面淬火的适用厚度范围,还缺乏系统的研究。本研究对壁厚为44 mm的Cr-Mo钢无缝储氢容器分别进行了单面淬火和双面淬火。从这些容器的圆柱体沿壁厚取样,进行硬度试验和夏比冲击试验。同时,通过数值模拟分析了温度和相位沿壁厚的变化规律。在此基础上,通过模拟不同壁厚容器的力学均匀性,制定了淬火策略。结果表明:单面淬火时,硬度和冲击吸收能由外表面向内表面逐渐降低,双面淬火时硬度和冲击吸收能呈明显的v型分布;这种差异主要是由于单面淬火和双面淬火在冷却速率和相分布上的显著差异。为满足GB/T 44457规定的最大允许硬度偏差,对于壁厚不超过40mm的容器,建议采用单面淬火,对于壁厚在40mm ~ 60mm的容器,建议采用双面淬火。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the quenching strategies for seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel
Seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel are commonly used for hydrogen refueling stations, whereas due to high-pressure storage requirements and the resulting large wall thickness, conventional single-sided quenched vessels usually face poor uniformity of mechanical properties along the wall thickness after heat treatment. In response to this issue, double-sided quenching has been proposed as an improved solution, while single-sided quenching remains a practical option for vessels with thin wall thicknesses due to its simplicity and low cost. To date, there is a lack of systematic research to clearly define the applicable thickness ranges for single-sided and double-sided quenching of such vessels. In this study, seamless hydrogen storage vessels made of Cr–Mo steel with a wall thickness of 44 mm underwent single-sided quenching and double-sided quenching, respectively. Specimens sampled from the cylinder of these vessels along the wall thickness were subjected to hardness tests and Charpy impact tests. Concurrently, the variations in temperature and phase along the wall thickness were analyzed through numerical simulation. Based on this, quenching strategies were developed by simulating the mechanical uniformity of vessels with different wall thicknesses. Results indicate that when subjected to single-sided quenching, both hardness and impact absorbed energy gradually decrease from the outer surface to the inner surface, while double-sided quenching results in a distinct V-shaped distribution of these properties. This difference is primarily attributed to the significant variations in cooling rates and resulting phase distributions between single-sided and double-sided quenching. To meet the maximum permissible hardness deviations specified in GB/T 44457, single-sided quenching is suitable for vessels with wall thicknesses not exceeding 40 mm and double-sided quenching is recommended for vessels with wall thicknesses between 40 mm and 60 mm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 工程技术-环境科学
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
3502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The objective of the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy is to facilitate the exchange of new ideas, technological advancements, and research findings in the field of Hydrogen Energy among scientists and engineers worldwide. This journal showcases original research, both analytical and experimental, covering various aspects of Hydrogen Energy. These include production, storage, transmission, utilization, enabling technologies, environmental impact, economic considerations, and global perspectives on hydrogen and its carriers such as NH3, CH4, alcohols, etc. The utilization aspect encompasses various methods such as thermochemical (combustion), photochemical, electrochemical (fuel cells), and nuclear conversion of hydrogen, hydrogen isotopes, and hydrogen carriers into thermal, mechanical, and electrical energies. The applications of these energies can be found in transportation (including aerospace), industrial, commercial, and residential sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信