为脆弱环境下的决策捕捉农耕活动的社会感应

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Nadir Ahmed Elagib , Bashir M. Ahmed , Hussein M. Sulieman , Abbas E. Rahma , Marwan M.A. Ali , Karl Schneider
{"title":"为脆弱环境下的决策捕捉农耕活动的社会感应","authors":"Nadir Ahmed Elagib ,&nbsp;Bashir M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Hussein M. Sulieman ,&nbsp;Abbas E. Rahma ,&nbsp;Marwan M.A. Ali ,&nbsp;Karl Schneider","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social sensing data are lacking particularly in fragile and conflict-affected communities (FACAC). Stakeholder specific data are however needed to identify vulnerabilities and exposure to hazards. Climate vagaries, environmental degradation, high political pressure, shrinking economy predominantly dependent on agricultural production, and violent conflict characterize challenges of many developing countries. Based upon our experience in collecting geospatial datasets on farm management practices in the African Sahel, we address key questions: Which approach to comprehensive social data acquisition is suitable and promising particularly in FACAC? Can such an approach mitigate shortages in data availability arising from insufficient or failing government structures? To this end, we present challenges encountered, opportunities and key lessons. We aim to offer a guiding blueprint for researchers and practitioners to organize farm-level surveys in fragile and conflict-affected states. A survey was developed and used in Sudan by means of a smartphone app and in traditional paper form. The survey took place during the period spanning July 2022 to April 2024. Challenges such as sampling under non-updated census, lack of logistics, technology, financial limitation, distrust, low women representation, remoteness and vastness of localities, lacking infrastructure, and dialect often limit the access to different groups of farmers. Using international cooperation of Sudanese and German researchers, involving official staff and locals, and a balanced use of traditional as well as Information and Communication Technology (ICT) approaches facilitated a successful data collection campaign. The survey resulted in &gt;1800 interviews with over 70 questions pertaining to three different farming systems, namely traditional and mechanized rainfed as well as irrigated systems. Our results and recommendations show that conducting social sensing at the farm level in challenging situations can be effectively achieved as a basis for research and policy intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 103638"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capturing social sensing of farming activities for policymaking in fragile contexts\",\"authors\":\"Nadir Ahmed Elagib ,&nbsp;Bashir M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Hussein M. Sulieman ,&nbsp;Abbas E. Rahma ,&nbsp;Marwan M.A. Ali ,&nbsp;Karl Schneider\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social sensing data are lacking particularly in fragile and conflict-affected communities (FACAC). Stakeholder specific data are however needed to identify vulnerabilities and exposure to hazards. Climate vagaries, environmental degradation, high political pressure, shrinking economy predominantly dependent on agricultural production, and violent conflict characterize challenges of many developing countries. Based upon our experience in collecting geospatial datasets on farm management practices in the African Sahel, we address key questions: Which approach to comprehensive social data acquisition is suitable and promising particularly in FACAC? Can such an approach mitigate shortages in data availability arising from insufficient or failing government structures? To this end, we present challenges encountered, opportunities and key lessons. We aim to offer a guiding blueprint for researchers and practitioners to organize farm-level surveys in fragile and conflict-affected states. A survey was developed and used in Sudan by means of a smartphone app and in traditional paper form. The survey took place during the period spanning July 2022 to April 2024. Challenges such as sampling under non-updated census, lack of logistics, technology, financial limitation, distrust, low women representation, remoteness and vastness of localities, lacking infrastructure, and dialect often limit the access to different groups of farmers. Using international cooperation of Sudanese and German researchers, involving official staff and locals, and a balanced use of traditional as well as Information and Communication Technology (ICT) approaches facilitated a successful data collection campaign. The survey resulted in &gt;1800 interviews with over 70 questions pertaining to three different farming systems, namely traditional and mechanized rainfed as well as irrigated systems. Our results and recommendations show that conducting social sensing at the farm level in challenging situations can be effectively achieved as a basis for research and policy intervention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000786\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000786","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

特别是在脆弱和受冲突影响的社区(FACAC),缺乏社会传感数据。然而,需要特定于利益相关者的数据来识别漏洞和风险暴露。气候变化无常、环境退化、巨大的政治压力、主要依赖农业生产的经济萎缩以及暴力冲突是许多发展中国家面临的挑战。根据我们在收集非洲萨赫勒地区农场管理实践地理空间数据集方面的经验,我们解决了关键问题:哪一种全面的社会数据获取方法特别适合FACAC?这种方法能否缓解因政府结构不足或失败而导致的数据可用性短缺?为此,我们提出了面临的挑战、机遇和主要教训。我们的目标是为研究人员和从业者在脆弱和受冲突影响的国家组织农场级调查提供一个指导性蓝图。在苏丹,通过智能手机应用程序和传统的纸质形式开发和使用了一项调查。该调查于2022年7月至2024年4月期间进行。在不更新的人口普查中抽样、缺乏后勤、技术、资金限制、不信任、妇女代表性低、地方偏远和广阔、缺乏基础设施和方言等挑战往往限制了不同群体的农民获得信息。利用苏丹和德国研究人员的国际合作,包括官方工作人员和当地人,以及平衡地使用传统方法和信息和通信技术(ICT)方法,促进了成功的数据收集运动。该调查涉及1800个访谈,涉及70多个问题,涉及三种不同的农业系统,即传统和机械化雨养以及灌溉系统。我们的研究结果和建议表明,在具有挑战性的情况下,在农场层面进行社会感知可以有效地实现,作为研究和政策干预的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Capturing social sensing of farming activities for policymaking in fragile contexts

Capturing social sensing of farming activities for policymaking in fragile contexts
Social sensing data are lacking particularly in fragile and conflict-affected communities (FACAC). Stakeholder specific data are however needed to identify vulnerabilities and exposure to hazards. Climate vagaries, environmental degradation, high political pressure, shrinking economy predominantly dependent on agricultural production, and violent conflict characterize challenges of many developing countries. Based upon our experience in collecting geospatial datasets on farm management practices in the African Sahel, we address key questions: Which approach to comprehensive social data acquisition is suitable and promising particularly in FACAC? Can such an approach mitigate shortages in data availability arising from insufficient or failing government structures? To this end, we present challenges encountered, opportunities and key lessons. We aim to offer a guiding blueprint for researchers and practitioners to organize farm-level surveys in fragile and conflict-affected states. A survey was developed and used in Sudan by means of a smartphone app and in traditional paper form. The survey took place during the period spanning July 2022 to April 2024. Challenges such as sampling under non-updated census, lack of logistics, technology, financial limitation, distrust, low women representation, remoteness and vastness of localities, lacking infrastructure, and dialect often limit the access to different groups of farmers. Using international cooperation of Sudanese and German researchers, involving official staff and locals, and a balanced use of traditional as well as Information and Communication Technology (ICT) approaches facilitated a successful data collection campaign. The survey resulted in >1800 interviews with over 70 questions pertaining to three different farming systems, namely traditional and mechanized rainfed as well as irrigated systems. Our results and recommendations show that conducting social sensing at the farm level in challenging situations can be effectively achieved as a basis for research and policy intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信