Ange Wang , Jiyao Wang , Chunxi Huang , Dengbo He , Hai Yang
{"title":"探索有条件自动驾驶汽车中驾驶员的生理-心理状态对接管行为的影响","authors":"Ange Wang , Jiyao Wang , Chunxi Huang , Dengbo He , Hai Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although driving automation is promised to improve driving safety, drivers are still required to take over the control of the vehicles in case of emergency. Estimating drivers’ takeover performance serves as the basis for adaptive driving automation and takeover request (TOR) to ensure driving safety. However, although algorithms have been proposed to estimate drivers’ takeover performance through physiological and eye-tracking measures, the complex interrelationships between these metrics and driver behavior, as well as the interactions among the metrics themselves, are not fully understood. To answer this question, a driving simulation experiment involving 42 participants was conducted. Drivers experienced three types of takeover scenarios requested by TOR while driving a conditionally automated vehicle. Drivers’ physiological, eye-tracking metrics and psychological states, as imposed by several non-driving-related tasks were collected. A structural equation model was used to explore the interactions among physiological metrics (i.e., cardiac activity, respiratory activity, electrodermal activity), eye-tracking metrics, psychological states (i.e., trust in driving automation and perceived workload), and variations in takeover time and takeover quality. The results showed that trust was positively associated with takeover quality, while workload was positively associated with takeover time. Additionally, physiological and eye-tracking metrics were indirectly associated with takeover quality via psychological states. This study reveals the hierarchical relationship among takeover-performance-related variables and provides insights for designing driver monitoring systems aimed at estimating takeover performance in vehicles with driving automation and adaptive driving automation to improve driving safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"216 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring how physio-psychological states affect drivers’ takeover performance in conditional automated vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Ange Wang , Jiyao Wang , Chunxi Huang , Dengbo He , Hai Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although driving automation is promised to improve driving safety, drivers are still required to take over the control of the vehicles in case of emergency. Estimating drivers’ takeover performance serves as the basis for adaptive driving automation and takeover request (TOR) to ensure driving safety. However, although algorithms have been proposed to estimate drivers’ takeover performance through physiological and eye-tracking measures, the complex interrelationships between these metrics and driver behavior, as well as the interactions among the metrics themselves, are not fully understood. To answer this question, a driving simulation experiment involving 42 participants was conducted. Drivers experienced three types of takeover scenarios requested by TOR while driving a conditionally automated vehicle. Drivers’ physiological, eye-tracking metrics and psychological states, as imposed by several non-driving-related tasks were collected. A structural equation model was used to explore the interactions among physiological metrics (i.e., cardiac activity, respiratory activity, electrodermal activity), eye-tracking metrics, psychological states (i.e., trust in driving automation and perceived workload), and variations in takeover time and takeover quality. The results showed that trust was positively associated with takeover quality, while workload was positively associated with takeover time. Additionally, physiological and eye-tracking metrics were indirectly associated with takeover quality via psychological states. This study reveals the hierarchical relationship among takeover-performance-related variables and provides insights for designing driver monitoring systems aimed at estimating takeover performance in vehicles with driving automation and adaptive driving automation to improve driving safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"216 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001083\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525001083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring how physio-psychological states affect drivers’ takeover performance in conditional automated vehicles
Although driving automation is promised to improve driving safety, drivers are still required to take over the control of the vehicles in case of emergency. Estimating drivers’ takeover performance serves as the basis for adaptive driving automation and takeover request (TOR) to ensure driving safety. However, although algorithms have been proposed to estimate drivers’ takeover performance through physiological and eye-tracking measures, the complex interrelationships between these metrics and driver behavior, as well as the interactions among the metrics themselves, are not fully understood. To answer this question, a driving simulation experiment involving 42 participants was conducted. Drivers experienced three types of takeover scenarios requested by TOR while driving a conditionally automated vehicle. Drivers’ physiological, eye-tracking metrics and psychological states, as imposed by several non-driving-related tasks were collected. A structural equation model was used to explore the interactions among physiological metrics (i.e., cardiac activity, respiratory activity, electrodermal activity), eye-tracking metrics, psychological states (i.e., trust in driving automation and perceived workload), and variations in takeover time and takeover quality. The results showed that trust was positively associated with takeover quality, while workload was positively associated with takeover time. Additionally, physiological and eye-tracking metrics were indirectly associated with takeover quality via psychological states. This study reveals the hierarchical relationship among takeover-performance-related variables and provides insights for designing driver monitoring systems aimed at estimating takeover performance in vehicles with driving automation and adaptive driving automation to improve driving safety.
期刊介绍:
Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.