C.A. Rue , S.D. Myers , C.A.J. Vine , V.R. Nevola , B.J. Lee , E.F. Walker , S.L. Coakley , T.R. Flood , J. Doherty , S. Jackson , J.P. Greeves , S.D. Blacker
{"title":"人工准备一个4人战壕作为军事防御阵地的体力需求的工作任务分析","authors":"C.A. Rue , S.D. Myers , C.A.J. Vine , V.R. Nevola , B.J. Lee , E.F. Walker , S.L. Coakley , T.R. Flood , J. Doherty , S. Jackson , J.P. Greeves , S.D. Blacker","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Conduct a Job Task Analysis (JTA) to quantify the physical demands of preparing a defensive position by British Army Ground Close Combat (GCC) roles.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Subjective data to describe the demands of preparing a defensive position were gathered from focus groups (n = 90) and questionnaires (n = 1495). Eight GCC personnel were observed preparing a defensive position which involved digging, lifting, and carrying materials. The oxygen cost of digging was measured using staged reconstructions at <em>slow</em> (12 shovels min<sup>−1</sup>, n = 16) and <em>fast</em> (22 shovels min<sup>−1</sup>, n = 13) rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The JTA identified digging trenches, filling sandbags, and shovelling debris as principal tasks of preparing a defensive position. Oxygen cost during the <em>fast</em>-digging rate (27.45 ± 4.93 ml kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) was 26 % greater than the <em>slow</em>er rate (21.75 ± 2.83 ml kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>; <em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = −1.461).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Digging a defensive position was identified by military experts as a critical job-task, with variability in metabolic cost dependent on work rate. Data may inform selection, training, and technology interventions to improve task performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104520"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A job task analysis of the physical demands of manually preparing a 4-person battle trench as a military defensive position\",\"authors\":\"C.A. Rue , S.D. Myers , C.A.J. Vine , V.R. Nevola , B.J. Lee , E.F. Walker , S.L. Coakley , T.R. Flood , J. Doherty , S. Jackson , J.P. Greeves , S.D. Blacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Conduct a Job Task Analysis (JTA) to quantify the physical demands of preparing a defensive position by British Army Ground Close Combat (GCC) roles.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Subjective data to describe the demands of preparing a defensive position were gathered from focus groups (n = 90) and questionnaires (n = 1495). Eight GCC personnel were observed preparing a defensive position which involved digging, lifting, and carrying materials. The oxygen cost of digging was measured using staged reconstructions at <em>slow</em> (12 shovels min<sup>−1</sup>, n = 16) and <em>fast</em> (22 shovels min<sup>−1</sup>, n = 13) rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The JTA identified digging trenches, filling sandbags, and shovelling debris as principal tasks of preparing a defensive position. Oxygen cost during the <em>fast</em>-digging rate (27.45 ± 4.93 ml kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>) was 26 % greater than the <em>slow</em>er rate (21.75 ± 2.83 ml kg<sup>−1</sup> min<sup>−1</sup>; <em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = −1.461).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Digging a defensive position was identified by military experts as a critical job-task, with variability in metabolic cost dependent on work rate. Data may inform selection, training, and technology interventions to improve task performance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000560\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025000560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
进行工作任务分析(JTA)以量化英国陆军地面近距离战斗(GCC)角色准备防御位置的物理需求。方法从焦点小组(n = 90)和问卷调查(n = 1495)中收集描述准备防御阵地需求的主观数据。观察到8名海湾合作委员会人员正在准备一个防御阵地,其中包括挖掘、提升和搬运材料。通过分阶段重建,在慢速(12锹min - 1, n = 16)和快速(22锹min - 1, n = 13)速率下测量挖掘的氧气成本。结果JTA将挖沟、填沙袋和铲土确定为准备防御阵地的主要任务。快速挖掘时的耗氧量(27.45±4.93 ml kg−1 min−1)比慢速挖掘时(21.75±2.83 ml kg−1 min−1)高26%;p & lt;0.001, d =−1.461)。结论军事专家认为挖掘防御阵地是一项关键的工作任务,其代谢成本的变化取决于工作速率。数据可以为选择、培训和技术干预提供信息,以提高任务绩效。
A job task analysis of the physical demands of manually preparing a 4-person battle trench as a military defensive position
Aim
Conduct a Job Task Analysis (JTA) to quantify the physical demands of preparing a defensive position by British Army Ground Close Combat (GCC) roles.
Method
Subjective data to describe the demands of preparing a defensive position were gathered from focus groups (n = 90) and questionnaires (n = 1495). Eight GCC personnel were observed preparing a defensive position which involved digging, lifting, and carrying materials. The oxygen cost of digging was measured using staged reconstructions at slow (12 shovels min−1, n = 16) and fast (22 shovels min−1, n = 13) rates.
Results
The JTA identified digging trenches, filling sandbags, and shovelling debris as principal tasks of preparing a defensive position. Oxygen cost during the fast-digging rate (27.45 ± 4.93 ml kg−1 min−1) was 26 % greater than the slower rate (21.75 ± 2.83 ml kg−1 min−1; p < 0.001, d = −1.461).
Conclusion
Digging a defensive position was identified by military experts as a critical job-task, with variability in metabolic cost dependent on work rate. Data may inform selection, training, and technology interventions to improve task performance.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.