{"title":"地热离网系统有机朗肯循环配置的多目标优化:电力、DHW和氢气生产","authors":"A. Mokhtari , M. Jalalvand","doi":"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the optimization of an off-grid system for supplying electrical load and domestic hot water (DHW) to a building using geothermal energy. The system generates power through an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), with excess energy directed to an electrolyzer for hydrogen production. A residential complex in Tabriz, Iran, with 408 occupants, was selected as the case study, leveraging the availability of geothermal power. Three ORC configurations—basic ORC, ORC with reheater (RHORC), and regenerative ORC (RORC) were optimized in terms of energy, exergy, and economy. The optimization process utilized the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), aiming to maximize energy and exergy efficiency, hydrogen production, and minimize levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) and hydrogen (LCOH), while ensuring that electrical and DHW demands are met. The results demonstrate that the RORC configuration outperforms the other two cycles in all aspects: it produces 44.45 % more power than RHORC and 47.86 % more than ORC, with energy and exergy efficiencies of 49.03 % and 47.01 %, respectively. Furthermore, RORC generates significantly more hydrogen 63.81 % more than RHORC and 69.37 % more than ORC. Additionally, RORC has the lowest LCOE (4.52 cent. kWh<sup>−1</sup>) and LCOH (2.69 cent. kWh<sup>−1</sup>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37131,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 101003"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3E multi-objective optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle configurations for a geothermal off-grid system: Power, DHW, and hydrogen production\",\"authors\":\"A. Mokhtari , M. Jalalvand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecmx.2025.101003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigates the optimization of an off-grid system for supplying electrical load and domestic hot water (DHW) to a building using geothermal energy. The system generates power through an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), with excess energy directed to an electrolyzer for hydrogen production. A residential complex in Tabriz, Iran, with 408 occupants, was selected as the case study, leveraging the availability of geothermal power. Three ORC configurations—basic ORC, ORC with reheater (RHORC), and regenerative ORC (RORC) were optimized in terms of energy, exergy, and economy. The optimization process utilized the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), aiming to maximize energy and exergy efficiency, hydrogen production, and minimize levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) and hydrogen (LCOH), while ensuring that electrical and DHW demands are met. The results demonstrate that the RORC configuration outperforms the other two cycles in all aspects: it produces 44.45 % more power than RHORC and 47.86 % more than ORC, with energy and exergy efficiencies of 49.03 % and 47.01 %, respectively. Furthermore, RORC generates significantly more hydrogen 63.81 % more than RHORC and 69.37 % more than ORC. Additionally, RORC has the lowest LCOE (4.52 cent. kWh<sup>−1</sup>) and LCOH (2.69 cent. kWh<sup>−1</sup>).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Conversion and Management-X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525001357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management-X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590174525001357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
3E multi-objective optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle configurations for a geothermal off-grid system: Power, DHW, and hydrogen production
This study investigates the optimization of an off-grid system for supplying electrical load and domestic hot water (DHW) to a building using geothermal energy. The system generates power through an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC), with excess energy directed to an electrolyzer for hydrogen production. A residential complex in Tabriz, Iran, with 408 occupants, was selected as the case study, leveraging the availability of geothermal power. Three ORC configurations—basic ORC, ORC with reheater (RHORC), and regenerative ORC (RORC) were optimized in terms of energy, exergy, and economy. The optimization process utilized the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), aiming to maximize energy and exergy efficiency, hydrogen production, and minimize levelized costs of electricity (LCOE) and hydrogen (LCOH), while ensuring that electrical and DHW demands are met. The results demonstrate that the RORC configuration outperforms the other two cycles in all aspects: it produces 44.45 % more power than RHORC and 47.86 % more than ORC, with energy and exergy efficiencies of 49.03 % and 47.01 %, respectively. Furthermore, RORC generates significantly more hydrogen 63.81 % more than RHORC and 69.37 % more than ORC. Additionally, RORC has the lowest LCOE (4.52 cent. kWh−1) and LCOH (2.69 cent. kWh−1).
期刊介绍:
Energy Conversion and Management: X is the open access extension of the reputable journal Energy Conversion and Management, serving as a platform for interdisciplinary research on a wide array of critical energy subjects. The journal is dedicated to publishing original contributions and in-depth technical review articles that present groundbreaking research on topics spanning energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management, and sustainability.
The scope of Energy Conversion and Management: X encompasses various forms of energy, including mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic, and electric energy. It addresses all known energy resources, highlighting both conventional sources like fossil fuels and nuclear power, as well as renewable resources such as solar, biomass, hydro, wind, geothermal, and ocean energy.