{"title":"韵律突出如何影响口吃成人的发音运动参数和运动变异性?","authors":"Hailey C Kopera, Maria I Grigos","doi":"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined how focus-induced changes in degree of prosodic prominence impact articulatory movement parameters and movement variability in adults who stutter (AWS) and adults who do not stutter (AWNS). AWS were predicted to display greater across-trial variability in closing and opening duration, displacement, and velocity compared to AWNS as prosodic demands (i.e., addition of pitch accent, degree of prosodic strengthening) increased.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixteen AWS and 15 AWNS participated in this study. A question-answer paradigm was used to manipulate the prosodic structure of spoken sentences through changes in semantic focus, and articulatory movement data were collected via a motion capture system. Kinematic analyses included oral closing and opening duration, displacement, and peak velocity, as well as the variability of these measures across repeated productions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AWS and AWNS demonstrated prosodic strengthening of closing and opening gestures, contributing to the differentiation of non-focused and focused words, as well as different focus types (e.g., broad vs. narrow/contrastive). AWS demonstrated greater variability in closing displacement and velocity for unaccented, non-focused forms compared to other focus types and compared to AWNS, which was not in line with predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrates a complex relationship between degree of prosodic prominence and articulatory movement variability. Based on patterns observed in AWS, but not AWNS, it is plausible that processes involved in suppressing default nuclear accents could act as linguistic stressors on the speech motor systems of AWS. Further research is needed to advance our understanding of the role of prosody within a multifactorial view of stuttering.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Does Prosodic Prominence Impact Articulatory Movement Parameters and Movement Variability in Adults Who Stutter?\",\"authors\":\"Hailey C Kopera, Maria I Grigos\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined how focus-induced changes in degree of prosodic prominence impact articulatory movement parameters and movement variability in adults who stutter (AWS) and adults who do not stutter (AWNS). AWS were predicted to display greater across-trial variability in closing and opening duration, displacement, and velocity compared to AWNS as prosodic demands (i.e., addition of pitch accent, degree of prosodic strengthening) increased.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixteen AWS and 15 AWNS participated in this study. A question-answer paradigm was used to manipulate the prosodic structure of spoken sentences through changes in semantic focus, and articulatory movement data were collected via a motion capture system. Kinematic analyses included oral closing and opening duration, displacement, and peak velocity, as well as the variability of these measures across repeated productions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AWS and AWNS demonstrated prosodic strengthening of closing and opening gestures, contributing to the differentiation of non-focused and focused words, as well as different focus types (e.g., broad vs. narrow/contrastive). AWS demonstrated greater variability in closing displacement and velocity for unaccented, non-focused forms compared to other focus types and compared to AWNS, which was not in line with predictions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work demonstrates a complex relationship between degree of prosodic prominence and articulatory movement variability. Based on patterns observed in AWS, but not AWNS, it is plausible that processes involved in suppressing default nuclear accents could act as linguistic stressors on the speech motor systems of AWS. Further research is needed to advance our understanding of the role of prosody within a multifactorial view of stuttering.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00358\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How Does Prosodic Prominence Impact Articulatory Movement Parameters and Movement Variability in Adults Who Stutter?
Purpose: This study examined how focus-induced changes in degree of prosodic prominence impact articulatory movement parameters and movement variability in adults who stutter (AWS) and adults who do not stutter (AWNS). AWS were predicted to display greater across-trial variability in closing and opening duration, displacement, and velocity compared to AWNS as prosodic demands (i.e., addition of pitch accent, degree of prosodic strengthening) increased.
Method: Sixteen AWS and 15 AWNS participated in this study. A question-answer paradigm was used to manipulate the prosodic structure of spoken sentences through changes in semantic focus, and articulatory movement data were collected via a motion capture system. Kinematic analyses included oral closing and opening duration, displacement, and peak velocity, as well as the variability of these measures across repeated productions.
Results: AWS and AWNS demonstrated prosodic strengthening of closing and opening gestures, contributing to the differentiation of non-focused and focused words, as well as different focus types (e.g., broad vs. narrow/contrastive). AWS demonstrated greater variability in closing displacement and velocity for unaccented, non-focused forms compared to other focus types and compared to AWNS, which was not in line with predictions.
Conclusions: This work demonstrates a complex relationship between degree of prosodic prominence and articulatory movement variability. Based on patterns observed in AWS, but not AWNS, it is plausible that processes involved in suppressing default nuclear accents could act as linguistic stressors on the speech motor systems of AWS. Further research is needed to advance our understanding of the role of prosody within a multifactorial view of stuttering.
期刊介绍:
Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.