涉及HEARTS技术包和额外使用活动监测器以增加卒中后身体活动水平的远程保健干预:可行性随机对照试验方案。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0320026
Paula da Cruz Peniche, Olive Lennon, Jordana de Paula Magalhães, Jéssica Melo Dos Santos, Janaine Cunha Polese, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria
{"title":"涉及HEARTS技术包和额外使用活动监测器以增加卒中后身体活动水平的远程保健干预:可行性随机对照试验方案。","authors":"Paula da Cruz Peniche, Olive Lennon, Jordana de Paula Magalhães, Jéssica Melo Dos Santos, Janaine Cunha Polese, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0320026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low physical activity level is a common risk factor for recurrent stroke. Feasibility studies show behavior change interventions can increase physical activity participation, but face barriers (e.g., home visits or internet access). Low-cost telehealth approaches, like telephone calls, may overcome these challenges. Another low-cost strategy involves motivational tools supporting \"Behavioral Regulation,\" such as physical activity monitors. However, evidence is insufficient to support their use in increasing physical activity levels post-stroke. A systematic review suggests integrating these devices into multifaceted behavior change interventions (e.g., the 5As brief intervention outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package) may enhance their effectiveness. Combined with physical activity monitors and telephone follow-up, this approach has proven feasible for individuals post-stroke. These findings underscore the need to explore combining the 5As brief intervention with physical activity monitors to assess potential added benefits. This feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) study will investigate whether the telehealth intervention (by telephone call) combining the 5As brief intervention, as outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package, and physical activity monitoring, compared to a control group receiving only the 5As brief intervention, is feasible and supports a fully powered RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A feasibility RCT study, with blinded assessment, will assign 24 individuals post-stroke (diagnosed ≥ 6 months), aged ≥ 18 years, inactive, able to walk 10 meters independently, and medically approved for physical activity, to experimental (n = 12) or control group (n = 12). Both groups will undergo the 5As brief intervention (Ask, Advise, Assess, and Assist delivered face-to-face, and Arrange via telephone call follow-up), for 12 weeks, with the experimental group also using a physical activity monitor. Outcomes include feasibility of recruitment, intervention, measurement, and blinding the outcome assessor, cost and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The intervention aligns with stroke secondary prevention recommendations and utilizes low-cost telehealth approaches. This study will contribute to defining future RCT phases.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06068036.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 4","pages":"e0320026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telehealth intervention involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the additional use of an activity monitor to increase physical activity level post-stroke: Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Paula da Cruz Peniche, Olive Lennon, Jordana de Paula Magalhães, Jéssica Melo Dos Santos, Janaine Cunha Polese, Christina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0320026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low physical activity level is a common risk factor for recurrent stroke. Feasibility studies show behavior change interventions can increase physical activity participation, but face barriers (e.g., home visits or internet access). Low-cost telehealth approaches, like telephone calls, may overcome these challenges. Another low-cost strategy involves motivational tools supporting \\\"Behavioral Regulation,\\\" such as physical activity monitors. However, evidence is insufficient to support their use in increasing physical activity levels post-stroke. A systematic review suggests integrating these devices into multifaceted behavior change interventions (e.g., the 5As brief intervention outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package) may enhance their effectiveness. Combined with physical activity monitors and telephone follow-up, this approach has proven feasible for individuals post-stroke. These findings underscore the need to explore combining the 5As brief intervention with physical activity monitors to assess potential added benefits. This feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) study will investigate whether the telehealth intervention (by telephone call) combining the 5As brief intervention, as outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package, and physical activity monitoring, compared to a control group receiving only the 5As brief intervention, is feasible and supports a fully powered RCT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A feasibility RCT study, with blinded assessment, will assign 24 individuals post-stroke (diagnosed ≥ 6 months), aged ≥ 18 years, inactive, able to walk 10 meters independently, and medically approved for physical activity, to experimental (n = 12) or control group (n = 12). Both groups will undergo the 5As brief intervention (Ask, Advise, Assess, and Assist delivered face-to-face, and Arrange via telephone call follow-up), for 12 weeks, with the experimental group also using a physical activity monitor. Outcomes include feasibility of recruitment, intervention, measurement, and blinding the outcome assessor, cost and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The intervention aligns with stroke secondary prevention recommendations and utilizes low-cost telehealth approaches. This study will contribute to defining future RCT phases.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06068036.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"e0320026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970671/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:低体力活动水平是卒中复发的常见危险因素。可行性研究表明,行为改变干预措施可以增加身体活动的参与,但面临障碍(例如家访或互联网接入)。低成本的远程保健方法,如电话,可能克服这些挑战。另一种低成本策略涉及支持“行为调节”的激励工具,如身体活动监视器。然而,没有足够的证据支持它们用于增加中风后的身体活动水平。一项系统综述表明,将这些设备整合到多方面的行为改变干预措施中(例如,HEARTS技术包中概述的5As简短干预措施)可能会提高其有效性。结合身体活动监测和电话随访,这种方法已被证明对中风后的个人是可行的。这些发现强调有必要探索将5As短暂干预与身体活动监测相结合,以评估潜在的额外益处。这项可行性随机对照试验(RCT)研究将调查远程医疗干预(通过电话)结合5As简短干预(如HEARTS技术包中所述)和身体活动监测,与仅接受5As简短干预的对照组相比,是否可行并支持全动力RCT。方法:采用一项可行性随机对照研究,采用盲法评估,将24例脑卒中后(诊断≥6个月)、年龄≥18岁、不活动、能独立行走10米、医学上批准进行体育活动的患者分为实验组(n = 12)和对照组(n = 12)。两组都将进行为期12周的5a简短干预(面对面的询问、建议、评估和协助,以及通过电话随访安排),实验组也使用身体活动监测器。结果包括招募的可行性、干预、测量、结果评估者的盲化、成本和临床结果。讨论:干预与卒中二级预防建议一致,并利用低成本的远程医疗方法。这项研究将有助于确定未来的随机对照试验阶段。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06068036。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Telehealth intervention involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the additional use of an activity monitor to increase physical activity level post-stroke: Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Telehealth intervention involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the additional use of an activity monitor to increase physical activity level post-stroke: Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Telehealth intervention involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the additional use of an activity monitor to increase physical activity level post-stroke: Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Telehealth intervention involving the HEARTS Technical Package and the additional use of an activity monitor to increase physical activity level post-stroke: Protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial.

Background: Low physical activity level is a common risk factor for recurrent stroke. Feasibility studies show behavior change interventions can increase physical activity participation, but face barriers (e.g., home visits or internet access). Low-cost telehealth approaches, like telephone calls, may overcome these challenges. Another low-cost strategy involves motivational tools supporting "Behavioral Regulation," such as physical activity monitors. However, evidence is insufficient to support their use in increasing physical activity levels post-stroke. A systematic review suggests integrating these devices into multifaceted behavior change interventions (e.g., the 5As brief intervention outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package) may enhance their effectiveness. Combined with physical activity monitors and telephone follow-up, this approach has proven feasible for individuals post-stroke. These findings underscore the need to explore combining the 5As brief intervention with physical activity monitors to assess potential added benefits. This feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) study will investigate whether the telehealth intervention (by telephone call) combining the 5As brief intervention, as outlined in the HEARTS Technical Package, and physical activity monitoring, compared to a control group receiving only the 5As brief intervention, is feasible and supports a fully powered RCT.

Methods: A feasibility RCT study, with blinded assessment, will assign 24 individuals post-stroke (diagnosed ≥ 6 months), aged ≥ 18 years, inactive, able to walk 10 meters independently, and medically approved for physical activity, to experimental (n = 12) or control group (n = 12). Both groups will undergo the 5As brief intervention (Ask, Advise, Assess, and Assist delivered face-to-face, and Arrange via telephone call follow-up), for 12 weeks, with the experimental group also using a physical activity monitor. Outcomes include feasibility of recruitment, intervention, measurement, and blinding the outcome assessor, cost and clinical outcomes.

Discussion: The intervention aligns with stroke secondary prevention recommendations and utilizes low-cost telehealth approaches. This study will contribute to defining future RCT phases.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06068036.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信