尿液细胞外囊泡蛋白质组学分析中蛋白质增溶与归一化方法的比较。

IF 3.8 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Proteome Research Pub Date : 2025-05-02 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01085
Jun Wang, Yang Li, Yisheng Wang, Guoli Wang, Chenyang Zhao, Ying Zhang, Haojie Lu
{"title":"尿液细胞外囊泡蛋白质组学分析中蛋白质增溶与归一化方法的比较。","authors":"Jun Wang, Yang Li, Yisheng Wang, Guoli Wang, Chenyang Zhao, Ying Zhang, Haojie Lu","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a vital role in numerous biological processes. Proteomic research of EVs is crucial for understanding their functions and potential therapeutic implications. Despite many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry-based proteomics of EVs being described, the variability in protein extraction across different protocols has not been extensively investigated. Moreover, given the inherent heterogeneity of EVs, it is vital to conduct a thorough evaluation of normalization methods. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of three widely used lysis agents─sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), urea, and sodium deoxycholate (SDC)─for protein extraction from EVs. We also assess the impact of different normalization strategies on protein quantification, which is crucial for ensuring reliable results. Our results show that method-dependent differences in protein recovery were observed, particularly for membrane-associated proteins. We also find that common normalization strategies, such as urine creatinine and EV markers, did not significantly stabilize protein quantification, indicating that these methods are not universally applicable as normalization standards. Our work thereby provides a reference for the selection of MS sample preparation and normalization strategies for a given EV proteomics project.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":" ","pages":"2430-2442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Protein Solubilization and Normalization Methods for Proteomics Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles from Urine.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Wang, Yang Li, Yisheng Wang, Guoli Wang, Chenyang Zhao, Ying Zhang, Haojie Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a vital role in numerous biological processes. Proteomic research of EVs is crucial for understanding their functions and potential therapeutic implications. Despite many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry-based proteomics of EVs being described, the variability in protein extraction across different protocols has not been extensively investigated. Moreover, given the inherent heterogeneity of EVs, it is vital to conduct a thorough evaluation of normalization methods. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of three widely used lysis agents─sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), urea, and sodium deoxycholate (SDC)─for protein extraction from EVs. We also assess the impact of different normalization strategies on protein quantification, which is crucial for ensuring reliable results. Our results show that method-dependent differences in protein recovery were observed, particularly for membrane-associated proteins. We also find that common normalization strategies, such as urine creatinine and EV markers, did not significantly stabilize protein quantification, indicating that these methods are not universally applicable as normalization standards. Our work thereby provides a reference for the selection of MS sample preparation and normalization strategies for a given EV proteomics project.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2430-2442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Proteome Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01085\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细胞外囊泡在许多生物过程中起着至关重要的作用。ev的蛋白质组学研究对于了解其功能和潜在的治疗意义至关重要。尽管描述了许多基于质谱的电动汽车蛋白质组学的样品制备方案,但不同方案中蛋白质提取的可变性尚未得到广泛研究。此外,考虑到电动汽车固有的异质性,对归一化方法进行全面评估至关重要。在这里,我们全面比较了三种广泛使用的裂解剂─十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)、尿素和脱氧胆酸钠(SDC)─用于从电动汽车中提取蛋白质。我们还评估了不同规范化策略对蛋白质定量的影响,这对于确保可靠的结果至关重要。我们的研究结果表明,蛋白质回收率的方法依赖性差异被观察到,特别是对于膜相关蛋白。我们还发现,常见的归一化策略,如尿肌酐和EV标记物,并没有显著地稳定蛋白质定量,这表明这些方法并不是普遍适用的归一化标准。因此,我们的工作为特定EV蛋白质组学项目的MS样品制备和规范化策略的选择提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Protein Solubilization and Normalization Methods for Proteomics Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles from Urine.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) play a vital role in numerous biological processes. Proteomic research of EVs is crucial for understanding their functions and potential therapeutic implications. Despite many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry-based proteomics of EVs being described, the variability in protein extraction across different protocols has not been extensively investigated. Moreover, given the inherent heterogeneity of EVs, it is vital to conduct a thorough evaluation of normalization methods. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of three widely used lysis agents─sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), urea, and sodium deoxycholate (SDC)─for protein extraction from EVs. We also assess the impact of different normalization strategies on protein quantification, which is crucial for ensuring reliable results. Our results show that method-dependent differences in protein recovery were observed, particularly for membrane-associated proteins. We also find that common normalization strategies, such as urine creatinine and EV markers, did not significantly stabilize protein quantification, indicating that these methods are not universally applicable as normalization standards. Our work thereby provides a reference for the selection of MS sample preparation and normalization strategies for a given EV proteomics project.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信