职前教师对可考体育内容知识的感知与评价水平

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Brendan T. O’Keeffe, Conor Igoe, Padraic Rocliffe
{"title":"职前教师对可考体育内容知识的感知与评价水平","authors":"Brendan T. O’Keeffe, Conor Igoe, Padraic Rocliffe","doi":"10.1177/1356336x251329831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical education is now examined as part of the Leaving Certificate in Ireland. The primary aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between preservice physical education teachers’ perceived and assessed Leaving Certificate Physical Education (LCPE) subject-specific knowledge, referred to as common content knowledge (CCK). In total, 30 participants (73% female; undergraduate, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15; postgraduate, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15) were recruited from one teacher education institute in Ireland. Participants completed a perceived CCK survey followed by an assessment of CCK for all 10 topics on the LCPE specification. Mean perceived CCK was 60.1% (SD = 11.2); however, mean assessed CCK was 24.1% (SD = 7.7). The highest individual assessed CCK score was 51.3%. Over half (53.3%) of participants did not achieve a pass grade. Male teachers’ perceived CCK rating (63.3%, SD = 6.9) was significantly higher than females’ (52.8%, SD = 11.2, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.03). However, female teachers’ assessed CCK (31.0%, SD ± 8.8) was marginally higher than males’ (27.7%, SD ± 11.3; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.41). Postgraduate students’ perceived (58.5%, SD ± 10.27) and assessed CCK (33.1%, SD ± 9.24) did not differ significantly from undergraduates’ perceived (52.7%, SD ± 11.41) and assessed CCK (27.08%, SD ± 9.12) ( <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.37). Findings demonstrated deficiencies in preservice physical education teachers’ CCK, despite higher levels of perceived CCK. The introduction of a terminal physical education examination in secondary schools in Ireland may require more emphasis to be placed on CCK in physical education teacher education programmes.","PeriodicalId":47681,"journal":{"name":"European Physical Education Review","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preservice teachers’ perceived and assessed levels of examinable physical education content knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Brendan T. O’Keeffe, Conor Igoe, Padraic Rocliffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356336x251329831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physical education is now examined as part of the Leaving Certificate in Ireland. The primary aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between preservice physical education teachers’ perceived and assessed Leaving Certificate Physical Education (LCPE) subject-specific knowledge, referred to as common content knowledge (CCK). In total, 30 participants (73% female; undergraduate, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15; postgraduate, <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 15) were recruited from one teacher education institute in Ireland. Participants completed a perceived CCK survey followed by an assessment of CCK for all 10 topics on the LCPE specification. Mean perceived CCK was 60.1% (SD = 11.2); however, mean assessed CCK was 24.1% (SD = 7.7). The highest individual assessed CCK score was 51.3%. Over half (53.3%) of participants did not achieve a pass grade. Male teachers’ perceived CCK rating (63.3%, SD = 6.9) was significantly higher than females’ (52.8%, SD = 11.2, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.03). However, female teachers’ assessed CCK (31.0%, SD ± 8.8) was marginally higher than males’ (27.7%, SD ± 11.3; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.41). Postgraduate students’ perceived (58.5%, SD ± 10.27) and assessed CCK (33.1%, SD ± 9.24) did not differ significantly from undergraduates’ perceived (52.7%, SD ± 11.41) and assessed CCK (27.08%, SD ± 9.12) ( <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.37). Findings demonstrated deficiencies in preservice physical education teachers’ CCK, despite higher levels of perceived CCK. The introduction of a terminal physical education examination in secondary schools in Ireland may require more emphasis to be placed on CCK in physical education teacher education programmes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Physical Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251329831\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Physical Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336x251329831","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在爱尔兰,体育是毕业证书的一部分。本研究的主要目的是分析职前体育教师对离职证书体育(LCPE)专业知识(common content knowledge, CCK)的认知与评估之间的关系。共有30名参与者(73%为女性;本科生,n = 15;研究生,n = 15)从爱尔兰的一所教师教育学院招募。参与者完成了感知CCK调查,随后对LCPE规范中所有10个主题的CCK进行了评估。平均感知CCK为60.1% (SD = 11.2);然而,平均评估CCK为24.1% (SD = 7.7)。个体CCK评分最高为51.3%。超过一半(53.3%)的参与者没有达到及格分数。男教师感知CCK评分(63.3%,SD = 6.9)显著高于女教师(52.8%,SD = 11.2, p = 0.03)。女教师CCK评分(31.0%,SD±8.8)略高于男教师(27.7%,SD±11.3);P = 0.41)。研究生感知CCK (58.5%, SD±10.27)和评估CCK (33.1%, SD±9.24)与本科生感知CCK (52.7%, SD±11.41)和评估CCK (27.08%, SD±9.12)差异无统计学意义(p = 0.37)。调查结果显示,职前体育教师的CCK存在缺陷,尽管其感知的CCK水平较高。在爱尔兰中学引入期末体育考试可能需要在体育教师教育计划中更加强调CCK。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preservice teachers’ perceived and assessed levels of examinable physical education content knowledge
Physical education is now examined as part of the Leaving Certificate in Ireland. The primary aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between preservice physical education teachers’ perceived and assessed Leaving Certificate Physical Education (LCPE) subject-specific knowledge, referred to as common content knowledge (CCK). In total, 30 participants (73% female; undergraduate, n = 15; postgraduate, n = 15) were recruited from one teacher education institute in Ireland. Participants completed a perceived CCK survey followed by an assessment of CCK for all 10 topics on the LCPE specification. Mean perceived CCK was 60.1% (SD = 11.2); however, mean assessed CCK was 24.1% (SD = 7.7). The highest individual assessed CCK score was 51.3%. Over half (53.3%) of participants did not achieve a pass grade. Male teachers’ perceived CCK rating (63.3%, SD = 6.9) was significantly higher than females’ (52.8%, SD = 11.2, p = 0.03). However, female teachers’ assessed CCK (31.0%, SD ± 8.8) was marginally higher than males’ (27.7%, SD ± 11.3; p = 0.41). Postgraduate students’ perceived (58.5%, SD ± 10.27) and assessed CCK (33.1%, SD ± 9.24) did not differ significantly from undergraduates’ perceived (52.7%, SD ± 11.41) and assessed CCK (27.08%, SD ± 9.12) ( p = 0.37). Findings demonstrated deficiencies in preservice physical education teachers’ CCK, despite higher levels of perceived CCK. The introduction of a terminal physical education examination in secondary schools in Ireland may require more emphasis to be placed on CCK in physical education teacher education programmes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Physical Education Review
European Physical Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: - Multidisciplinary Approaches: European Physical Education Review brings together contributions from a wide range of disciplines across the natural and social sciences and humanities. It includes theoretical and research-based articles and occasionally devotes Special Issues to major topics and themes within the field. - International Coverage: European Physical Education Review publishes contributions from Europe and all regions of the world, promoting international communication among scholars and professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信