证据支持使用短种植体作为无嫁接解决方案-叙述性回顾。

IF 1.7
Michael S Block
{"title":"证据支持使用短种植体作为无嫁接解决方案-叙述性回顾。","authors":"Michael S Block","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide clinicians with information to develop a treatment plan to use short implants as either single or splinted restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study design was an analytical review of articles that reported clinical data with at least a 1-year follow-up. PubMed was the main source of information, and the years reviewed included 1990 to 2023. The inclusion criteria for this analytical analysis included retrospective and prospective studies. The predictor variable was the use of short implants for fixed restorations. The primary outcome variable was implant status coded as survived or failed. The covariates were the type of restoration using either splinted short implants or short implants used as single-tooth replacements, and time to failure was either less than 1 year or at least 1 year. Bivariate statistics assessed the association between splinting or single implants and failure with a significance of P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 articles were collated and summarized to answer specific clinical situation questions. Of those, 18 articles had retrospective or prospective data available for analysis, 11 articles were found for single-implant restorations, and 7 articles were found for splinted implant restorations. After applying the exclusion criteria, the sample size was 1,683 implants as reported in these articles: 853 single implants (50.7%) and 830 splinted implants (49.3%). A total of 62 (7.3%) single short implants failed compared to 36 of 830 (4.3%) splinted short implants. There were 565 implants that were > 8 mm in length, with 11 (1.9%) implant failures. The comparison between splinted and single-implant restorations for short and long implants was significant (P < .05) for all comparisons except for splinted versus single long implants. The comparison of the covariates single and splinted for both short and long implants separating failure < 1 year to longer loading indicated that short implants had more failure after loading (P < .05). The longer implants had nonsignificant differences comparing early failure to failures after longer loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short implants, when splinted together, have similar success rates compared to longer implants based on evidence from the refereed reports. Single short implants did have an increased risk for failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"547-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence Supports the Use of Short Implants as a Graftless Solution.\",\"authors\":\"Michael S Block\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/jomi.11188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide clinicians with information to develop a treatment plan to use short implants as either single or splinted restorations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study design was an analytical review of articles that reported clinical data with at least a 1-year follow-up. PubMed was the main source of information, and the years reviewed included 1990 to 2023. The inclusion criteria for this analytical analysis included retrospective and prospective studies. The predictor variable was the use of short implants for fixed restorations. The primary outcome variable was implant status coded as survived or failed. The covariates were the type of restoration using either splinted short implants or short implants used as single-tooth replacements, and time to failure was either less than 1 year or at least 1 year. Bivariate statistics assessed the association between splinting or single implants and failure with a significance of P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 50 articles were collated and summarized to answer specific clinical situation questions. Of those, 18 articles had retrospective or prospective data available for analysis, 11 articles were found for single-implant restorations, and 7 articles were found for splinted implant restorations. After applying the exclusion criteria, the sample size was 1,683 implants as reported in these articles: 853 single implants (50.7%) and 830 splinted implants (49.3%). A total of 62 (7.3%) single short implants failed compared to 36 of 830 (4.3%) splinted short implants. There were 565 implants that were > 8 mm in length, with 11 (1.9%) implant failures. The comparison between splinted and single-implant restorations for short and long implants was significant (P < .05) for all comparisons except for splinted versus single long implants. The comparison of the covariates single and splinted for both short and long implants separating failure < 1 year to longer loading indicated that short implants had more failure after loading (P < .05). The longer implants had nonsignificant differences comparing early failure to failures after longer loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short implants, when splinted together, have similar success rates compared to longer implants based on evidence from the refereed reports. Single short implants did have an increased risk for failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"547-554\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:拔牙后骨丢失是所有临床医生必须解决的临床问题。可用于支持植入物的骨体积可能有限,由于解剖学上的限制,可选择的方法包括移植手术或使用不需要骨增强的短植入物。这篇叙述性综述的重要性在于记录使用短植入物来修复骨容量有限的患者以避免移植手术的成功。这篇分析性叙述性综述的重要性在于记录使用短种植体修复骨体积有限的患者以避免移植手术的成功,并评估使用短种植体进行单牙修复时与夹板短种植体支持修复时的相对风险。目的是根据文献中的证据,为临床医生提供指导,以选择何时使用短种植体,或何时移植并使用较长的种植体。研究设计是对报道临床数据的文章进行分析性回顾,随访至少一年。Pubmed.gov是信息来源。审查的年份包括1990年至2023年。分析分析的纳入标准包括回顾性或前瞻性研究。预测变量:预测变量是使用短种植体进行固定修复。结果变量:主要结果变量是植入物状态,编码为存活或失败。协变量:使用夹板短种植体或短种植体作为单牙置换的修复类型,失败时间小于1年或大于1年。分析:双变量统计评估夹板或单种植体与失败之间的关系,p值< 0.05。结果:对50篇文献1-50进行整理总结,回答具体的临床情况问题。其中,18篇具有回顾性或前瞻性数据的文章可用于分析,其中11篇关于单种植体修复体,7篇关于夹板种植体修复体。应用排除标准后,这些文章报道的样本量为1683个种植体。单种植体853例(50.7%),夹板种植体830例(49.3%)。与830个夹板短种植体中的36个(4.3%)相比,62个(7.3%)单一短种植体失败。长度大于8mm的种植体包括565例,其中11例(1.9%)失败。短种植体与长种植体的夹板修复体与单种植体修复体的比较除了夹板修复体与单种植体修复体的比较外,所有的比较都具有显著性(p < 0.05)。比较短种植体和长种植体的协变量,单种植体和夹板种植体,将失败分离不到一年到更长时间的种植体,显示短种植体在加载后失败更多(p < 0.05)。较长的植入物与早期的加载时间相比没有显著差异。结论:根据参考报告的证据,短种植体与长种植体相比,在夹板一起固定时具有相似的成功。单个短植入物确实增加了失败的风险。方法:以Pubmed.gov为信息源。审查的年份包括1990年至2023年。纳入标准仅包括pubmed.gov中引用的期刊文章。没有统计分析的文章被排除。具体人群是接受短种植体修复缺牙的患者。干预措施包括使用短种植体固定在一起,与使用短种植体修复单个牙齿相比。回顾的结果包括根据所回顾文章的作者所报告的软硬组织健康状况随时间推移的生存率和使用成功率。结果:检索到的文章包括短种植体(n= 2333)、短种植体失败(n=814)、单个短种植体失败(n=223)、夹板短种植体失败(n=55)和短种植体存活(n=775)。从本次检索中,我们整理出了50篇符合纳入标准的文献1-50。在存在附着龈和有限的牙龈粘膜问题的情况下,短种植体与长种植体相比,在固定在一起时具有相似的长期成功。对于单个修复体,随着时间的推移,短种植体因丧失整合而导致失败的风险增加。与植入鼻窦的较长植入物相比,短植入物的成功率相似。短夹板种植体置入脊隆术的成功率与长种植体相似。结论:根据参考报告的证据,短种植体可以在夹板一起使用。单个短植入物确实会增加失败的风险。短种植体可与其他种植体夹板固定,避免鼻窦移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence Supports the Use of Short Implants as a Graftless Solution.

Purpose: To provide clinicians with information to develop a treatment plan to use short implants as either single or splinted restorations.

Materials and methods: The study design was an analytical review of articles that reported clinical data with at least a 1-year follow-up. PubMed was the main source of information, and the years reviewed included 1990 to 2023. The inclusion criteria for this analytical analysis included retrospective and prospective studies. The predictor variable was the use of short implants for fixed restorations. The primary outcome variable was implant status coded as survived or failed. The covariates were the type of restoration using either splinted short implants or short implants used as single-tooth replacements, and time to failure was either less than 1 year or at least 1 year. Bivariate statistics assessed the association between splinting or single implants and failure with a significance of P < .05.

Results: A total of 50 articles were collated and summarized to answer specific clinical situation questions. Of those, 18 articles had retrospective or prospective data available for analysis, 11 articles were found for single-implant restorations, and 7 articles were found for splinted implant restorations. After applying the exclusion criteria, the sample size was 1,683 implants as reported in these articles: 853 single implants (50.7%) and 830 splinted implants (49.3%). A total of 62 (7.3%) single short implants failed compared to 36 of 830 (4.3%) splinted short implants. There were 565 implants that were > 8 mm in length, with 11 (1.9%) implant failures. The comparison between splinted and single-implant restorations for short and long implants was significant (P < .05) for all comparisons except for splinted versus single long implants. The comparison of the covariates single and splinted for both short and long implants separating failure < 1 year to longer loading indicated that short implants had more failure after loading (P < .05). The longer implants had nonsignificant differences comparing early failure to failures after longer loading.

Conclusions: Short implants, when splinted together, have similar success rates compared to longer implants based on evidence from the refereed reports. Single short implants did have an increased risk for failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信