头颈癌发病率和死亡率的社会经济差异:老年人群体的区域财富依赖分析。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Dorota Świątek, Jakub Sikora, Wirginia Likus, Wioletta Pietruszewska, Jarosław Markowski
{"title":"头颈癌发病率和死亡率的社会经济差异:老年人群体的区域财富依赖分析。","authors":"Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Dorota Świątek, Jakub Sikora, Wirginia Likus, Wioletta Pietruszewska, Jarosław Markowski","doi":"10.1002/hed.28156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head and neck cancer (HNC) shows a \"diverging scissors\" pattern, with incidence and mortality linked to regional economic status.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to investigate whether socioeconomic disparities between regions correlate with widening gaps in HNC incidence and mortality rates, with particular emphasis on age-related patterns among elderly populations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data from the National Cancer Registry for females from 2003 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>76 649 patients, 49 858 males, 26 791 females from 2003 to 2019 in age cohorts: 60-69, 70-79, and 80+, covering all voivodeships in Poland.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Five Groups were established based on the Wealth Indicator (WI) value, from 54,72 to 243,66 EUR in G1-G5, respectively. Trend lines for incidence and mortality rates were calculated, and slope tests were used to determine statistical significance: positive incidence rate (IR)(+), mortality rate (MR)(+), neutral (IR(0), MR(0)), or negative (IR(-), MR(-)). Comparative analyses included slope differences between incidence and mortality trends (IR>MR, IR=MR, IR<MR) using tests with Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HNC incidence and mortality rates have risen consistently over two decades, regardless of regional economic status. More affluent regions show a better incidence-to-mortality ratio, but no improvement is seen in the 80+ age group. Female patients achieve consistently better outcomes than males across all regions and age groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Despite the optimal selection of the WI (Wealth Indicator) indicator, it does not fully reflect the income stratification issue, particularly in the G5, the wealthiest group. The analysis does not capture the problem of increased incidence rates in the most industrialized region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for enhanced screening protocols for males to address gender disparities in HNC outcomes and tailored therapeutic strategies for the 80+ age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioeconomic Disparities in Head Neck Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Regional Wealth-Dependent Analysis in Seniors Cohorts.\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Wierzbicka, Dorota Świątek, Jakub Sikora, Wirginia Likus, Wioletta Pietruszewska, Jarosław Markowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.28156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Head and neck cancer (HNC) shows a \\\"diverging scissors\\\" pattern, with incidence and mortality linked to regional economic status.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aim to investigate whether socioeconomic disparities between regions correlate with widening gaps in HNC incidence and mortality rates, with particular emphasis on age-related patterns among elderly populations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Data from the National Cancer Registry for females from 2003 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>76 649 patients, 49 858 males, 26 791 females from 2003 to 2019 in age cohorts: 60-69, 70-79, and 80+, covering all voivodeships in Poland.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Five Groups were established based on the Wealth Indicator (WI) value, from 54,72 to 243,66 EUR in G1-G5, respectively. Trend lines for incidence and mortality rates were calculated, and slope tests were used to determine statistical significance: positive incidence rate (IR)(+), mortality rate (MR)(+), neutral (IR(0), MR(0)), or negative (IR(-), MR(-)). Comparative analyses included slope differences between incidence and mortality trends (IR>MR, IR=MR, IR<MR) using tests with Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HNC incidence and mortality rates have risen consistently over two decades, regardless of regional economic status. More affluent regions show a better incidence-to-mortality ratio, but no improvement is seen in the 80+ age group. Female patients achieve consistently better outcomes than males across all regions and age groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Despite the optimal selection of the WI (Wealth Indicator) indicator, it does not fully reflect the income stratification issue, particularly in the G5, the wealthiest group. The analysis does not capture the problem of increased incidence rates in the most industrialized region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings highlight the need for enhanced screening protocols for males to address gender disparities in HNC outcomes and tailored therapeutic strategies for the 80+ age group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.28156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:头颈癌(HNC)呈“分叉剪刀”型,发病率和死亡率与区域经济状况有关。目的:我们的目的是调查地区之间的社会经济差异是否与HNC发病率和死亡率差距扩大相关,特别强调老年人群的年龄相关模式。设计:横断面研究。背景:2003年至2019年女性国家癌症登记处的数据。患者:2003年至2019年,76 649例患者,49 858例男性,26 791例女性,年龄队列:60-69岁,70-79岁和80岁以上,涵盖波兰所有省份。测量方法:根据财富指标(WI)值划分了五组,G1-G5分别为54,72至243,66欧元。计算发病率和死亡率的趋势线,并使用斜率检验确定统计学显著性:阳性发病率(IR)(+)、死亡率(MR)(+)、中性(IR(0)、MR(0))或阴性(IR(-)、MR(-))。比较分析包括发病率和死亡率趋势之间的斜率差异(IR>MR, IR=MR, IR)。结果:无论区域经济状况如何,HNC发病率和死亡率在过去20年中一直在上升。较富裕地区的发病率与死亡率较好,但80岁以上年龄组没有改善。在所有地区和年龄组中,女性患者的预后始终优于男性。局限性:尽管WI(财富指标)指标的选择是最优的,但它并不能完全反映收入分层问题,特别是在G5这个最富有的群体中。该分析没有涉及工业化程度最高的地区发病率增加的问题。结论:研究结果强调需要加强男性筛查方案,以解决HNC结局的性别差异,并为80岁以上年龄组量身定制治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioeconomic Disparities in Head Neck Cancer Incidence and Mortality: Regional Wealth-Dependent Analysis in Seniors Cohorts.

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) shows a "diverging scissors" pattern, with incidence and mortality linked to regional economic status.

Objective: We aim to investigate whether socioeconomic disparities between regions correlate with widening gaps in HNC incidence and mortality rates, with particular emphasis on age-related patterns among elderly populations.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Data from the National Cancer Registry for females from 2003 to 2019.

Patients: 76 649 patients, 49 858 males, 26 791 females from 2003 to 2019 in age cohorts: 60-69, 70-79, and 80+, covering all voivodeships in Poland.

Measurements: Five Groups were established based on the Wealth Indicator (WI) value, from 54,72 to 243,66 EUR in G1-G5, respectively. Trend lines for incidence and mortality rates were calculated, and slope tests were used to determine statistical significance: positive incidence rate (IR)(+), mortality rate (MR)(+), neutral (IR(0), MR(0)), or negative (IR(-), MR(-)). Comparative analyses included slope differences between incidence and mortality trends (IR>MR, IR=MR, IR

Results: HNC incidence and mortality rates have risen consistently over two decades, regardless of regional economic status. More affluent regions show a better incidence-to-mortality ratio, but no improvement is seen in the 80+ age group. Female patients achieve consistently better outcomes than males across all regions and age groups.

Limitations: Despite the optimal selection of the WI (Wealth Indicator) indicator, it does not fully reflect the income stratification issue, particularly in the G5, the wealthiest group. The analysis does not capture the problem of increased incidence rates in the most industrialized region.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for enhanced screening protocols for males to address gender disparities in HNC outcomes and tailored therapeutic strategies for the 80+ age group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信