全膝关节置换术后需要在麻醉状态下进行操作的风险因素:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Sumit Patel, Son Tran, Juliana Overbey, Richa Gupta, Andre Ksajikian, Keith Kenter, Karen Bovid, Yong Li
{"title":"全膝关节置换术后需要在麻醉状态下进行操作的风险因素:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Sumit Patel, Son Tran, Juliana Overbey, Richa Gupta, Andre Ksajikian, Keith Kenter, Karen Bovid, Yong Li","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a complication that can result in poor patient outcomes, reduced satisfaction, and even necessitate revision surgery. A common treatment for knee stiffness after TKA is manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate risk factors for stiffness following primary TKA that resulted in MUA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were six databases searched from inception to October 1, 2023, with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 1,108 abstracts and 390 full-text articles that were screened for those that included risk factors predictive of MUA following TKA. The risk of biases was assessed using Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) criteria. Meta-analysis using odds ratio was calculated. The database search yielded 53 studies involving 2,931,517 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were five risk factors that were found to be significant: Younger age (mean differences: -4.23 years; 95% CI [confidence interval]: -8.17 to -0.29), Black race (OR [odds ratio]: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.56 to 2.40), smoking (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.02), preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ 2 (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.76), and prior knee procedure (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.69). There was no evidence for sex (OR; 1.30, 95% CI [0.74 to 2.30], P = 0.32), obesity (OR; 0.84, 95% CI [0.67 to 1.05], P = 0.12), and diabetes (OR; 0.85, 95% CI [0.69 to 1.05], P = 0.14) as potential risk factors for stiffness requiring MUA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our meta-analysis indicate that the Black race, younger age, smoking, preoperative ASA scores ≤ 2, and prior knee surgery are strong evidence as risk factors for postoperative need for MUA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for the Need for Manipulation Under Anesthesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sumit Patel, Son Tran, Juliana Overbey, Richa Gupta, Andre Ksajikian, Keith Kenter, Karen Bovid, Yong Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a complication that can result in poor patient outcomes, reduced satisfaction, and even necessitate revision surgery. A common treatment for knee stiffness after TKA is manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate risk factors for stiffness following primary TKA that resulted in MUA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>There were six databases searched from inception to October 1, 2023, with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 1,108 abstracts and 390 full-text articles that were screened for those that included risk factors predictive of MUA following TKA. The risk of biases was assessed using Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) criteria. Meta-analysis using odds ratio was calculated. The database search yielded 53 studies involving 2,931,517 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were five risk factors that were found to be significant: Younger age (mean differences: -4.23 years; 95% CI [confidence interval]: -8.17 to -0.29), Black race (OR [odds ratio]: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.56 to 2.40), smoking (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.02), preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ 2 (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.76), and prior knee procedure (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.69). There was no evidence for sex (OR; 1.30, 95% CI [0.74 to 2.30], P = 0.32), obesity (OR; 0.84, 95% CI [0.67 to 1.05], P = 0.12), and diabetes (OR; 0.85, 95% CI [0.69 to 1.05], P = 0.14) as potential risk factors for stiffness requiring MUA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our meta-analysis indicate that the Black race, younger age, smoking, preoperative ASA scores ≤ 2, and prior knee surgery are strong evidence as risk factors for postoperative need for MUA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.03.064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导语:全膝关节置换术(TKA)术后膝关节僵硬是一种并发症,可导致患者预后不佳,满意度降低,甚至需要翻修手术。TKA后膝关节僵硬的常见治疗方法是麻醉下操作(MUA)。本系统综述的目的是识别和评估导致MUA的原发性TKA后僵硬的危险因素。方法:检索6个数据库,从成立到2023年10月1日,采用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。我们筛选了1108篇摘要和390篇全文文章,其中包括TKA后MUA的预测风险因素。使用预后研究质量(QUIPS)标准评估偏倚风险。采用优势比进行meta分析。数据库检索产生了53项研究,涉及2931517名患者。结果:发现5个危险因素具有显著性:年龄较小(平均差值:-4.23岁;95% CI[置信区间]:-8.17 ~ -0.29),黑人(OR[比值比]:1.94;95% CI: 1.56 - 2.40),吸烟(OR: 1.43;95% CI: 1.02 ~ 2.02),术前美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)评分≤2 (OR: 0.64;95% CI: 0.55 ~ 0.76),既往膝关节手术(OR: 2.00;95% CI: 1.49 ~ 2.69)。没有证据表明性别(OR;1.30, 95% CI [0.74 ~ 2.30], P = 0.32),肥胖(OR;0.84, 95% CI [0.67 ~ 1.05], P = 0.12),糖尿病(OR;0.85, 95% CI[0.69至1.05],P = 0.14)作为需要MUA的僵硬的潜在危险因素。结论:我们的荟萃分析结果表明,黑人、年轻、吸烟、术前ASA评分≤2分和既往膝关节手术是术后需要MUA的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Factors for the Need for Manipulation Under Anesthesia Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Introduction: Postoperative knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a complication that can result in poor patient outcomes, reduced satisfaction, and even necessitate revision surgery. A common treatment for knee stiffness after TKA is manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate risk factors for stiffness following primary TKA that resulted in MUA.

Methods: There were six databases searched from inception to October 1, 2023, with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. There were 1,108 abstracts and 390 full-text articles that were screened for those that included risk factors predictive of MUA following TKA. The risk of biases was assessed using Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) criteria. Meta-analysis using odds ratio was calculated. The database search yielded 53 studies involving 2,931,517 patients.

Results: There were five risk factors that were found to be significant: Younger age (mean differences: -4.23 years; 95% CI [confidence interval]: -8.17 to -0.29), Black race (OR [odds ratio]: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.56 to 2.40), smoking (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.02), preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ 2 (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.76), and prior knee procedure (OR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.49 to 2.69). There was no evidence for sex (OR; 1.30, 95% CI [0.74 to 2.30], P = 0.32), obesity (OR; 0.84, 95% CI [0.67 to 1.05], P = 0.12), and diabetes (OR; 0.85, 95% CI [0.69 to 1.05], P = 0.14) as potential risk factors for stiffness requiring MUA.

Conclusion: The results of our meta-analysis indicate that the Black race, younger age, smoking, preoperative ASA scores ≤ 2, and prior knee surgery are strong evidence as risk factors for postoperative need for MUA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信