{"title":"在习惯性坐姿中,腰椎运动学是否会导致个体腰痛的发展?","authors":"Jessa M Davidson, Jack P Callaghan","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored differences in activities and spine kinematics by transient low back pain status throughout a week of their usual office work. Using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, twenty participants were classified as non-pain (NPD) and pain developers (PD; ≥10 mm). Tri-axial accelerometers measured sitting time and thorax, pelvis, and lumbar spine angles. Amplitude probability distribution functions were constructed for postures and movements. PD (n = 6) exhibited increases in pain daily, with partial or complete recovery overnight and full recovery over the weekend, hence pain did not accumulate. PD sat more than NPD (n = 14), exhibited decreased peak posterior pelvic tilt (10°) and thorax inclination (8°), and tended to demonstrate less frequent spine movements. To decrease the risk of pain with sitting, reducing seated time, reclining on the seatback, and promoting seated movements should be recommended. With habitual exposures, small differences between pain groups could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain over time.<b>Practitioner Summary:</b> The biomechanical link between habitual sitting and low back pain remains unclear. Activity, spine kinematics, and pain ratings were collected throughout a week of individuals' seated work at their own workstation. Small differences between those with and without transient low back pain could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do lumbar spine kinematics contribute to individual low back pain development in habitual sitting?\",\"authors\":\"Jessa M Davidson, Jack P Callaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored differences in activities and spine kinematics by transient low back pain status throughout a week of their usual office work. Using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, twenty participants were classified as non-pain (NPD) and pain developers (PD; ≥10 mm). Tri-axial accelerometers measured sitting time and thorax, pelvis, and lumbar spine angles. Amplitude probability distribution functions were constructed for postures and movements. PD (n = 6) exhibited increases in pain daily, with partial or complete recovery overnight and full recovery over the weekend, hence pain did not accumulate. PD sat more than NPD (n = 14), exhibited decreased peak posterior pelvic tilt (10°) and thorax inclination (8°), and tended to demonstrate less frequent spine movements. To decrease the risk of pain with sitting, reducing seated time, reclining on the seatback, and promoting seated movements should be recommended. With habitual exposures, small differences between pain groups could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain over time.<b>Practitioner Summary:</b> The biomechanical link between habitual sitting and low back pain remains unclear. Activity, spine kinematics, and pain ratings were collected throughout a week of individuals' seated work at their own workstation. Small differences between those with and without transient low back pain could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do lumbar spine kinematics contribute to individual low back pain development in habitual sitting?
This study explored differences in activities and spine kinematics by transient low back pain status throughout a week of their usual office work. Using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, twenty participants were classified as non-pain (NPD) and pain developers (PD; ≥10 mm). Tri-axial accelerometers measured sitting time and thorax, pelvis, and lumbar spine angles. Amplitude probability distribution functions were constructed for postures and movements. PD (n = 6) exhibited increases in pain daily, with partial or complete recovery overnight and full recovery over the weekend, hence pain did not accumulate. PD sat more than NPD (n = 14), exhibited decreased peak posterior pelvic tilt (10°) and thorax inclination (8°), and tended to demonstrate less frequent spine movements. To decrease the risk of pain with sitting, reducing seated time, reclining on the seatback, and promoting seated movements should be recommended. With habitual exposures, small differences between pain groups could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain over time.Practitioner Summary: The biomechanical link between habitual sitting and low back pain remains unclear. Activity, spine kinematics, and pain ratings were collected throughout a week of individuals' seated work at their own workstation. Small differences between those with and without transient low back pain could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.