在习惯性坐姿中,腰椎运动学是否会导致个体腰痛的发展?

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jessa M Davidson, Jack P Callaghan
{"title":"在习惯性坐姿中,腰椎运动学是否会导致个体腰痛的发展?","authors":"Jessa M Davidson, Jack P Callaghan","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored differences in activities and spine kinematics by transient low back pain status throughout a week of their usual office work. Using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, twenty participants were classified as non-pain (NPD) and pain developers (PD; ≥10 mm). Tri-axial accelerometers measured sitting time and thorax, pelvis, and lumbar spine angles. Amplitude probability distribution functions were constructed for postures and movements. PD (n = 6) exhibited increases in pain daily, with partial or complete recovery overnight and full recovery over the weekend, hence pain did not accumulate. PD sat more than NPD (n = 14), exhibited decreased peak posterior pelvic tilt (10°) and thorax inclination (8°), and tended to demonstrate less frequent spine movements. To decrease the risk of pain with sitting, reducing seated time, reclining on the seatback, and promoting seated movements should be recommended. With habitual exposures, small differences between pain groups could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain over time.<b>Practitioner Summary:</b> The biomechanical link between habitual sitting and low back pain remains unclear. Activity, spine kinematics, and pain ratings were collected throughout a week of individuals' seated work at their own workstation. Small differences between those with and without transient low back pain could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do lumbar spine kinematics contribute to individual low back pain development in habitual sitting?\",\"authors\":\"Jessa M Davidson, Jack P Callaghan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explored differences in activities and spine kinematics by transient low back pain status throughout a week of their usual office work. Using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, twenty participants were classified as non-pain (NPD) and pain developers (PD; ≥10 mm). Tri-axial accelerometers measured sitting time and thorax, pelvis, and lumbar spine angles. Amplitude probability distribution functions were constructed for postures and movements. PD (n = 6) exhibited increases in pain daily, with partial or complete recovery overnight and full recovery over the weekend, hence pain did not accumulate. PD sat more than NPD (n = 14), exhibited decreased peak posterior pelvic tilt (10°) and thorax inclination (8°), and tended to demonstrate less frequent spine movements. To decrease the risk of pain with sitting, reducing seated time, reclining on the seatback, and promoting seated movements should be recommended. With habitual exposures, small differences between pain groups could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain over time.<b>Practitioner Summary:</b> The biomechanical link between habitual sitting and low back pain remains unclear. Activity, spine kinematics, and pain ratings were collected throughout a week of individuals' seated work at their own workstation. Small differences between those with and without transient low back pain could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2481608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究探讨了在一周的日常办公室工作中,短暂的腰痛状态对活动和脊柱运动学的影响。采用100毫米视觉模拟量表,将20名参与者分为无疼痛(NPD)和疼痛发展(PD;≥10毫米)。三轴加速度计测量坐姿时间和胸、骨盆和腰椎角度。构造了姿态和动作的振幅概率分布函数。PD (n = 6)表现出疼痛每天都在增加,一夜之间部分或完全恢复,周末完全恢复,因此疼痛没有积累。PD高于NPD (n = 14),表现出骨盆后倾角峰值(10°)和胸腔倾角峰值(8°)降低,脊柱运动频率更低。为了减少坐着疼痛的风险,建议减少坐着的时间,斜靠在椅背上,并促进坐姿运动。在习惯性暴露的情况下,疼痛组之间的微小差异可能表明,随着时间的推移,与久坐相关的背部疼痛有一条途径。从业者总结:习惯性坐姿和腰痛之间的生物力学联系尚不清楚。活动,脊柱运动学和疼痛评分收集了整个一周的个人在自己的工作站坐着工作。有和没有短暂腰痛的人之间的细微差异可能暗示了与坐有关的腰痛的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do lumbar spine kinematics contribute to individual low back pain development in habitual sitting?

This study explored differences in activities and spine kinematics by transient low back pain status throughout a week of their usual office work. Using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, twenty participants were classified as non-pain (NPD) and pain developers (PD; ≥10 mm). Tri-axial accelerometers measured sitting time and thorax, pelvis, and lumbar spine angles. Amplitude probability distribution functions were constructed for postures and movements. PD (n = 6) exhibited increases in pain daily, with partial or complete recovery overnight and full recovery over the weekend, hence pain did not accumulate. PD sat more than NPD (n = 14), exhibited decreased peak posterior pelvic tilt (10°) and thorax inclination (8°), and tended to demonstrate less frequent spine movements. To decrease the risk of pain with sitting, reducing seated time, reclining on the seatback, and promoting seated movements should be recommended. With habitual exposures, small differences between pain groups could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain over time.Practitioner Summary: The biomechanical link between habitual sitting and low back pain remains unclear. Activity, spine kinematics, and pain ratings were collected throughout a week of individuals' seated work at their own workstation. Small differences between those with and without transient low back pain could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信