Sean K Burr, Miao Yu, Danny Clark, Dana Alonzo, Robin E Gearing
{"title":"预防自杀的数字干预。","authors":"Sean K Burr, Miao Yu, Danny Clark, Dana Alonzo, Robin E Gearing","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Digital-based mobile interventions hold significant promise in preventing suicide. Although mixed, some evidence suggests these interventions are effective and capable of overcoming barriers such as cost and stigma. <i>Aim(s):</i> This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of digital interventions designed to address suicidal ideation and behaviors and the impacts of age, gender, and control group type on these outcomes. <i>Methods:</i> Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on digital suicide interventions (apps/online programs) published before January 1, 2022. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model in Stata 17. <i>Results:</i> The search identified 4,317 articles, and 16 were included. Risk of bias analysis found studies to be of low-to-moderate quality. The random-effects model indicated a small but significant effect of treatment on suicidal ideation, <i>k</i> = 16, <i>g</i> = 0.11 (95% CI: 0-0.23), <i>p</i> = .049. Subgroup analyses found the interventions to have a significant effect on adults (<i>g</i> = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.28, <i>p</i> = .01) but not adolescents. The interventions showed better effects compared to waitlist controls (<i>g</i> = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.38) but not compared to treatment as usual or active controls [χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 29.41, <i>p</i> < .001]. <i>Limitations</i><i>:</i> Sample sizes across studies were insufficient for examining the effectiveness of digital interventions by gender. Limited studies reported on suicidal behaviors, so the impact of digital interventions on these behaviors could not be analyzed. <i>Conclusions:</i> This review found a significant effect of digital interventions for reducing suicidal ideation and highlights the importance of examining the effectiveness across subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Interventions for Suicide Prevention.\",\"authors\":\"Sean K Burr, Miao Yu, Danny Clark, Dana Alonzo, Robin E Gearing\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a000996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Digital-based mobile interventions hold significant promise in preventing suicide. Although mixed, some evidence suggests these interventions are effective and capable of overcoming barriers such as cost and stigma. <i>Aim(s):</i> This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of digital interventions designed to address suicidal ideation and behaviors and the impacts of age, gender, and control group type on these outcomes. <i>Methods:</i> Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on digital suicide interventions (apps/online programs) published before January 1, 2022. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model in Stata 17. <i>Results:</i> The search identified 4,317 articles, and 16 were included. Risk of bias analysis found studies to be of low-to-moderate quality. The random-effects model indicated a small but significant effect of treatment on suicidal ideation, <i>k</i> = 16, <i>g</i> = 0.11 (95% CI: 0-0.23), <i>p</i> = .049. Subgroup analyses found the interventions to have a significant effect on adults (<i>g</i> = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.28, <i>p</i> = .01) but not adolescents. The interventions showed better effects compared to waitlist controls (<i>g</i> = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.38) but not compared to treatment as usual or active controls [χ<sup>2</sup>(2) = 29.41, <i>p</i> < .001]. <i>Limitations</i><i>:</i> Sample sizes across studies were insufficient for examining the effectiveness of digital interventions by gender. Limited studies reported on suicidal behaviors, so the impact of digital interventions on these behaviors could not be analyzed. <i>Conclusions:</i> This review found a significant effect of digital interventions for reducing suicidal ideation and highlights the importance of examining the effectiveness across subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:基于数字的移动干预在预防自杀方面具有重要的前景。尽管情况好坏参半,但一些证据表明,这些干预措施是有效的,能够克服成本和耻辱等障碍。目的:本综述旨在确定旨在解决自杀意念和行为的数字干预措施的有效性,以及年龄、性别和对照组类型对这些结果的影响。方法:检索数据库,检索2022年1月1日之前发表的关于数字自杀干预(应用程序/在线程序)的随机对照试验(rct)。使用Stata 17中的随机效应模型分析数据。结果:检索到4317篇文章,其中16篇被收录。偏倚风险分析发现研究质量为中低。随机效应模型显示,治疗对自杀意念的影响虽小但显著,k = 16, g = 0.11 (95% CI: 0-0.23), p = 0.049。亚组分析发现,干预措施对成年人有显著影响(g = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.28, p = 0.01),但对青少年没有影响。干预措施与候补组相比效果更好(g = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.38),但与常规治疗或积极治疗组相比效果不佳[χ2(2) = 29.41, p < .001]。局限性:跨研究的样本量不足以按性别检查数字干预的有效性。关于自杀行为的研究报告有限,因此无法分析数字干预对这些行为的影响。结论:本综述发现数字干预在减少自杀意念方面有显著效果,并强调了跨亚组检查其有效性的重要性。
Background: Digital-based mobile interventions hold significant promise in preventing suicide. Although mixed, some evidence suggests these interventions are effective and capable of overcoming barriers such as cost and stigma. Aim(s): This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of digital interventions designed to address suicidal ideation and behaviors and the impacts of age, gender, and control group type on these outcomes. Methods: Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on digital suicide interventions (apps/online programs) published before January 1, 2022. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model in Stata 17. Results: The search identified 4,317 articles, and 16 were included. Risk of bias analysis found studies to be of low-to-moderate quality. The random-effects model indicated a small but significant effect of treatment on suicidal ideation, k = 16, g = 0.11 (95% CI: 0-0.23), p = .049. Subgroup analyses found the interventions to have a significant effect on adults (g = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.28, p = .01) but not adolescents. The interventions showed better effects compared to waitlist controls (g = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.38) but not compared to treatment as usual or active controls [χ2(2) = 29.41, p < .001]. Limitations: Sample sizes across studies were insufficient for examining the effectiveness of digital interventions by gender. Limited studies reported on suicidal behaviors, so the impact of digital interventions on these behaviors could not be analyzed. Conclusions: This review found a significant effect of digital interventions for reducing suicidal ideation and highlights the importance of examining the effectiveness across subgroups.
期刊介绍:
A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.