2000-2018年华盛顿州可筛查癌症患者生存率的持续影响

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Solmaz Amiri, Anthippy Petras, Dedra Buchwald
{"title":"2000-2018年华盛顿州可筛查癌症患者生存率的持续影响","authors":"Solmaz Amiri, Anthippy Petras, Dedra Buchwald","doi":"10.1007/s11524-025-00973-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the extent to which the 1930s Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) redlining grades are associated with contemporary survival from screenable cancers among residents of three largest cities in Washington State. Redling assigned a mortgage security metric to neighborhoods. We used 2000-2018 data from the Washington State Cancer Registry to examine differences in survival from all-cause and cancer-specific mortality for breast (n = 14,725), cervical (n = 656), colorectal (n = 7,089), and lung (n = 8,365). Survival was examined in HOLC areas graded as A (best); B (still desirable); C (declining); and D (redlined) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression techniques. Among patients with breast cancer, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was highest for areas graded D followed by C and B. For colorectal and lung cancer, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was highest for areas graded C followed by D and B. The estimated marginal slopes for the log hazard of mortality decreased over time in HOLC areas graded A, B, and C for breast and lung cancers, and in areas graded D for colorectal and lung cancers. HOLC grade was not associated with survival among cervical cancer patients. These findings call for efforts to reduce screenable - but often unrecognized - health inequalities associated with residential location.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"290-304"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12031675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Persistent Effect of Redlining on Survival from Screenable Cancers in Washington State, 2000-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Solmaz Amiri, Anthippy Petras, Dedra Buchwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11524-025-00973-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined the extent to which the 1930s Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) redlining grades are associated with contemporary survival from screenable cancers among residents of three largest cities in Washington State. Redling assigned a mortgage security metric to neighborhoods. We used 2000-2018 data from the Washington State Cancer Registry to examine differences in survival from all-cause and cancer-specific mortality for breast (n = 14,725), cervical (n = 656), colorectal (n = 7,089), and lung (n = 8,365). Survival was examined in HOLC areas graded as A (best); B (still desirable); C (declining); and D (redlined) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression techniques. Among patients with breast cancer, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was highest for areas graded D followed by C and B. For colorectal and lung cancer, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was highest for areas graded C followed by D and B. The estimated marginal slopes for the log hazard of mortality decreased over time in HOLC areas graded A, B, and C for breast and lung cancers, and in areas graded D for colorectal and lung cancers. HOLC grade was not associated with survival among cervical cancer patients. These findings call for efforts to reduce screenable - but often unrecognized - health inequalities associated with residential location.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"290-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12031675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00973-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00973-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究调查了20世纪30年代房主贷款公司(HOLC)的红线等级与华盛顿州三个最大城市居民当代可筛查癌症的生存率之间的关系。雷德林给社区分配了一个抵押贷款安全指标。我们使用华盛顿州癌症登记处2000-2018年的数据来检查乳腺癌(n = 14,725)、宫颈癌(n = 656)、结直肠癌(n = 7,089)和肺癌(n = 8,365)的全因生存率和癌症特异性死亡率的差异。HOLC区生存率评分为A(最佳);B(仍然可取);C(下降);和D(红线)使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险回归技术。在乳腺癌患者中,全因死亡率的风险比在分级为D的地区最高,其次是C和B。对于结直肠癌和肺癌,全因死亡率的风险比在分级为C的地区最高,其次是D和B。在分级为A、B和C的HOLC地区,乳腺癌和肺癌的对数风险的估计边际斜率随着时间的推移而降低,在分级为D的地区,结直肠癌和肺癌的对数风险的估计边际斜率随着时间的推移而降低。宫颈癌患者的HOLC分级与生存率无关。这些发现呼吁努力减少可筛查但往往未被认识到的与居住地点有关的健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Persistent Effect of Redlining on Survival from Screenable Cancers in Washington State, 2000-2018.

This study examined the extent to which the 1930s Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) redlining grades are associated with contemporary survival from screenable cancers among residents of three largest cities in Washington State. Redling assigned a mortgage security metric to neighborhoods. We used 2000-2018 data from the Washington State Cancer Registry to examine differences in survival from all-cause and cancer-specific mortality for breast (n = 14,725), cervical (n = 656), colorectal (n = 7,089), and lung (n = 8,365). Survival was examined in HOLC areas graded as A (best); B (still desirable); C (declining); and D (redlined) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression techniques. Among patients with breast cancer, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was highest for areas graded D followed by C and B. For colorectal and lung cancer, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was highest for areas graded C followed by D and B. The estimated marginal slopes for the log hazard of mortality decreased over time in HOLC areas graded A, B, and C for breast and lung cancers, and in areas graded D for colorectal and lung cancers. HOLC grade was not associated with survival among cervical cancer patients. These findings call for efforts to reduce screenable - but often unrecognized - health inequalities associated with residential location.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信