肩胛骨动态运动的临床可行定量评估:范围审查。

IF 1.6 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.26603/001c.133522
Will Pitt, Michael S Crowell, John S Mason, Mark D Thelen
{"title":"肩胛骨动态运动的临床可行定量评估:范围审查。","authors":"Will Pitt, Michael S Crowell, John S Mason, Mark D Thelen","doi":"10.26603/001c.133522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scapular kinematics and stabilization are crucial for optimal upper extremity function. Disruptions in normal scapular motion, also rereferred to as dyskinesis, are associated with injuries like subacromial impingement and glenohumeral instability. Clinically feasible methods to assess dynamic scapular motion are essential for accurate diagnosis and rehabilitation but remain limited in both reliability and functionality.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically identify and summarize the existing literature on clinically feasible quantitative methods that assess active dynamic scapular motion in at least one plane. It seeks to identify tools, technologies, and protocols used in clinical settings, highlighting gaps in current research.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping Review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases. Studies that utilized clinically feasible methods to assess scapular motion in at least one plane, and with continuous motion or at least two actively achieved and maintained positions (dynamic), were included. Data were extracted regarding instrument types, measurement methods, dynamic motions assessed, and reliability/validity results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 62 studies meeting inclusion criteria, digital inclinometers were the most frequently used tools, followed by gravity inclinometers and measuring tapes. Scapular upward rotation was the most commonly assessed motion, with a majority of studies focusing on static or basic dynamic tasks rather than functional or sport-specific activities. Validity results varied, with moderate to strong correlations in some tools, but reliability was inconsistent, particularly in dynamic settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically feasible methods for assessing dynamic scapular motion exist, but their reliability and ability to capture continuous motion during functional movements are limited. Further research is needed to develop tools that can assess scapular motion during dynamic, multi-planar, and functional tasks, enhancing clinical decision-making for injury prevention and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2b.</p>","PeriodicalId":47892,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"20 4","pages":"487-502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinically Feasible Quantitative Assessments of Dynamic Scapular Motion: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Will Pitt, Michael S Crowell, John S Mason, Mark D Thelen\",\"doi\":\"10.26603/001c.133522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scapular kinematics and stabilization are crucial for optimal upper extremity function. Disruptions in normal scapular motion, also rereferred to as dyskinesis, are associated with injuries like subacromial impingement and glenohumeral instability. Clinically feasible methods to assess dynamic scapular motion are essential for accurate diagnosis and rehabilitation but remain limited in both reliability and functionality.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically identify and summarize the existing literature on clinically feasible quantitative methods that assess active dynamic scapular motion in at least one plane. It seeks to identify tools, technologies, and protocols used in clinical settings, highlighting gaps in current research.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Scoping Review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases. Studies that utilized clinically feasible methods to assess scapular motion in at least one plane, and with continuous motion or at least two actively achieved and maintained positions (dynamic), were included. Data were extracted regarding instrument types, measurement methods, dynamic motions assessed, and reliability/validity results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 62 studies meeting inclusion criteria, digital inclinometers were the most frequently used tools, followed by gravity inclinometers and measuring tapes. Scapular upward rotation was the most commonly assessed motion, with a majority of studies focusing on static or basic dynamic tasks rather than functional or sport-specific activities. Validity results varied, with moderate to strong correlations in some tools, but reliability was inconsistent, particularly in dynamic settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically feasible methods for assessing dynamic scapular motion exist, but their reliability and ability to capture continuous motion during functional movements are limited. Further research is needed to develop tools that can assess scapular motion during dynamic, multi-planar, and functional tasks, enhancing clinical decision-making for injury prevention and rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2b.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"487-502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.133522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.133522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肩胛运动学和稳定性对上肢功能的优化至关重要。肩胛骨正常运动的中断(也称为运动障碍)与肩峰下撞击和盂肱不稳定性等损伤有关。临床上可行的肩胛骨动态运动评估方法对于准确诊断和康复至关重要,但在可靠性和功能性方面仍存在局限性。目的:本范围综述旨在系统地识别和总结现有文献中关于临床上可行的至少在一个平面上评估肩胛骨主动动态运动的定量方法。它旨在确定临床环境中使用的工具、技术和方案,强调当前研究中存在的差距:研究设计:范围综述:方法:在 PubMed、CINAHL 和 SPORTDiscus 数据库中进行系统检索。纳入了使用临床上可行的方法评估肩胛骨在至少一个平面上的运动、连续运动或至少两个主动达到并保持的位置(动态)的研究。研究提取了有关仪器类型、测量方法、评估的动态运动以及可靠性/有效性结果的数据:在符合纳入标准的 62 项研究中,数字倾角仪是最常用的工具,其次是重力倾角仪和测量带。肩胛骨上旋是最常评估的运动,大多数研究侧重于静态或基本动态任务,而非功能性或特定运动活动。有效性结果各不相同,一些工具具有中等至较强的相关性,但可靠性不一致,尤其是在动态环境中:结论:临床上存在可行的肩胛骨动态运动评估方法,但其可靠性和捕捉功能性运动中连续运动的能力有限。需要进一步研究开发可评估动态、多平面和功能性任务中肩胛骨运动的工具,以加强损伤预防和康复的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinically Feasible Quantitative Assessments of Dynamic Scapular Motion: A Scoping Review.

Background: Scapular kinematics and stabilization are crucial for optimal upper extremity function. Disruptions in normal scapular motion, also rereferred to as dyskinesis, are associated with injuries like subacromial impingement and glenohumeral instability. Clinically feasible methods to assess dynamic scapular motion are essential for accurate diagnosis and rehabilitation but remain limited in both reliability and functionality.

Purpose: The purpose of this scoping review was to systematically identify and summarize the existing literature on clinically feasible quantitative methods that assess active dynamic scapular motion in at least one plane. It seeks to identify tools, technologies, and protocols used in clinical settings, highlighting gaps in current research.

Study design: Scoping Review.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases. Studies that utilized clinically feasible methods to assess scapular motion in at least one plane, and with continuous motion or at least two actively achieved and maintained positions (dynamic), were included. Data were extracted regarding instrument types, measurement methods, dynamic motions assessed, and reliability/validity results.

Results: Of the 62 studies meeting inclusion criteria, digital inclinometers were the most frequently used tools, followed by gravity inclinometers and measuring tapes. Scapular upward rotation was the most commonly assessed motion, with a majority of studies focusing on static or basic dynamic tasks rather than functional or sport-specific activities. Validity results varied, with moderate to strong correlations in some tools, but reliability was inconsistent, particularly in dynamic settings.

Conclusions: Clinically feasible methods for assessing dynamic scapular motion exist, but their reliability and ability to capture continuous motion during functional movements are limited. Further research is needed to develop tools that can assess scapular motion during dynamic, multi-planar, and functional tasks, enhancing clinical decision-making for injury prevention and rehabilitation.

Level of evidence: 2b.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
124
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信