某三级医院甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑处方及用量优化评价。

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Maialen Inclán-Conde , Clara Vila-Gallego , Maite Vara-Urruchua , Ana Victoria Aguirrezabal-Arredondo , Óscar Luis Ferreiro-Benéitez , Matxalen Vidal-García , Pamela Ruiz-Rodríguez , José Antonio Domínguez-Menéndez
{"title":"某三级医院甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑处方及用量优化评价。","authors":"Maialen Inclán-Conde ,&nbsp;Clara Vila-Gallego ,&nbsp;Maite Vara-Urruchua ,&nbsp;Ana Victoria Aguirrezabal-Arredondo ,&nbsp;Óscar Luis Ferreiro-Benéitez ,&nbsp;Matxalen Vidal-García ,&nbsp;Pamela Ruiz-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;José Antonio Domínguez-Menéndez","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the impact on improving the appropriateness of prescribing following a pharmaceutical intervention based on the review and optimisation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim prescriptions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A before-after intervention study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The first period, or intervention period, was prospective and ran from September 2021 to January 2022. The second or post-intervention period was retrospective and covered the period March-December 2022.</div><div>In case of discrepancy between indication and prescribed and recommended dosage, the physician was notified and the degree of acceptance was recorded. In the post-intervention period, we retrospectively analysed the adequacy of the dosage, checking whether any intervention had been carried out by the Pharmacy Department. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the intervention period, 69 prescriptions were analysed, and 18 were found to be inappropriate (26%), 12 related to <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em> infection. In the post-intervention period, 129 prescriptions were reviewed, and 12 were considered inadequate (9%). Statistical analysis of the results obtained in both periods (18/69 and 12/129) showed statistically significant differences (<em>p</em> = 0.0082).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pharmaceutical intervention in the review and optimisation of prescriptions improves the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The results obtained provide evidence of the importance of pharmaceutical review of such prescriptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 5","pages":"Pages 304-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de la prescripción de sulfametoxazol-trimetoprima y optimización posológica en un hospital de tercer nivel\",\"authors\":\"Maialen Inclán-Conde ,&nbsp;Clara Vila-Gallego ,&nbsp;Maite Vara-Urruchua ,&nbsp;Ana Victoria Aguirrezabal-Arredondo ,&nbsp;Óscar Luis Ferreiro-Benéitez ,&nbsp;Matxalen Vidal-García ,&nbsp;Pamela Ruiz-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;José Antonio Domínguez-Menéndez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farma.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the impact on improving the appropriateness of prescribing following a pharmaceutical intervention based on the review and optimisation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim prescriptions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A before-after intervention study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The first period, or intervention period, was prospective and ran from September 2021 to January 2022. The second or post-intervention period was retrospective and covered the period March-December 2022.</div><div>In case of discrepancy between indication and prescribed and recommended dosage, the physician was notified and the degree of acceptance was recorded. In the post-intervention period, we retrospectively analysed the adequacy of the dosage, checking whether any intervention had been carried out by the Pharmacy Department. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the intervention period, 69 prescriptions were analysed, and 18 were found to be inappropriate (26%), 12 related to <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em> infection. In the post-intervention period, 129 prescriptions were reviewed, and 12 were considered inadequate (9%). Statistical analysis of the results obtained in both periods (18/69 and 12/129) showed statistically significant differences (<em>p</em> = 0.0082).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pharmaceutical intervention in the review and optimisation of prescriptions improves the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The results obtained provide evidence of the importance of pharmaceutical review of such prescriptions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 304-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634325000273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634325000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过对磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶处方的回顾和优化,评价药物干预对提高处方适宜性的影响。方法:在某三级医院进行干预前后对照研究。第一阶段,或干预期,是前瞻性的,从2021年9月到2022年1月。第二个或干预后阶段是回顾性的,涵盖2022年3月至12月期间。如果适应症与处方和推荐剂量之间存在差异,应通知医生并记录接受程度。在干预期后,我们回顾性分析了剂量是否充足,检查药剂科是否进行了任何干预。采用卡方检验进行统计学分析。结果:干预期间共分析处方69张,发现处方不合适18张(26%),其中12张与嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌感染有关。干预后,审查了129张处方,其中12张被认为不足(9%)。统计分析两期(18/69和12/129)的结果,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.0082)。结论:药物干预对处方的审查和优化促进了磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶的使用。所获得的结果证明了这类处方的药物审查的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluación de la prescripción de sulfametoxazol-trimetoprima y optimización posológica en un hospital de tercer nivel

Objective

Evaluate the impact on improving the appropriateness of prescribing following a pharmaceutical intervention based on the review and optimisation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim prescriptions.

Methods

A before-after intervention study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The first period, or intervention period, was prospective and ran from September 2021 to January 2022. The second or post-intervention period was retrospective and covered the period March-December 2022.
In case of discrepancy between indication and prescribed and recommended dosage, the physician was notified and the degree of acceptance was recorded. In the post-intervention period, we retrospectively analysed the adequacy of the dosage, checking whether any intervention had been carried out by the Pharmacy Department. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.

Results

During the intervention period, 69 prescriptions were analysed, and 18 were found to be inappropriate (26%), 12 related to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection. In the post-intervention period, 129 prescriptions were reviewed, and 12 were considered inadequate (9%). Statistical analysis of the results obtained in both periods (18/69 and 12/129) showed statistically significant differences (p = 0.0082).

Conclusions

Pharmaceutical intervention in the review and optimisation of prescriptions improves the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The results obtained provide evidence of the importance of pharmaceutical review of such prescriptions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA
FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信