Maialen Inclán-Conde , Clara Vila-Gallego , Maite Vara-Urruchua , Ana Victoria Aguirrezabal-Arredondo , Óscar Luis Ferreiro-Benéitez , Matxalen Vidal-García , Pamela Ruiz-Rodríguez , José Antonio Domínguez-Menéndez
{"title":"某三级医院甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑处方及用量优化评价。","authors":"Maialen Inclán-Conde , Clara Vila-Gallego , Maite Vara-Urruchua , Ana Victoria Aguirrezabal-Arredondo , Óscar Luis Ferreiro-Benéitez , Matxalen Vidal-García , Pamela Ruiz-Rodríguez , José Antonio Domínguez-Menéndez","doi":"10.1016/j.farma.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the impact on improving the appropriateness of prescribing following a pharmaceutical intervention based on the review and optimisation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim prescriptions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A before-after intervention study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The first period, or intervention period, was prospective and ran from September 2021 to January 2022. The second or post-intervention period was retrospective and covered the period March-December 2022.</div><div>In case of discrepancy between indication and prescribed and recommended dosage, the physician was notified and the degree of acceptance was recorded. In the post-intervention period, we retrospectively analysed the adequacy of the dosage, checking whether any intervention had been carried out by the Pharmacy Department. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the intervention period, 69 prescriptions were analysed, and 18 were found to be inappropriate (26%), 12 related to <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em> infection. In the post-intervention period, 129 prescriptions were reviewed, and 12 were considered inadequate (9%). Statistical analysis of the results obtained in both periods (18/69 and 12/129) showed statistically significant differences (<em>p</em> = 0.0082).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pharmaceutical intervention in the review and optimisation of prescriptions improves the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The results obtained provide evidence of the importance of pharmaceutical review of such prescriptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45860,"journal":{"name":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","volume":"49 5","pages":"Pages 304-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluación de la prescripción de sulfametoxazol-trimetoprima y optimización posológica en un hospital de tercer nivel\",\"authors\":\"Maialen Inclán-Conde , Clara Vila-Gallego , Maite Vara-Urruchua , Ana Victoria Aguirrezabal-Arredondo , Óscar Luis Ferreiro-Benéitez , Matxalen Vidal-García , Pamela Ruiz-Rodríguez , José Antonio Domínguez-Menéndez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.farma.2025.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Evaluate the impact on improving the appropriateness of prescribing following a pharmaceutical intervention based on the review and optimisation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim prescriptions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A before-after intervention study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The first period, or intervention period, was prospective and ran from September 2021 to January 2022. The second or post-intervention period was retrospective and covered the period March-December 2022.</div><div>In case of discrepancy between indication and prescribed and recommended dosage, the physician was notified and the degree of acceptance was recorded. In the post-intervention period, we retrospectively analysed the adequacy of the dosage, checking whether any intervention had been carried out by the Pharmacy Department. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>During the intervention period, 69 prescriptions were analysed, and 18 were found to be inappropriate (26%), 12 related to <em>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</em> infection. In the post-intervention period, 129 prescriptions were reviewed, and 12 were considered inadequate (9%). Statistical analysis of the results obtained in both periods (18/69 and 12/129) showed statistically significant differences (<em>p</em> = 0.0082).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Pharmaceutical intervention in the review and optimisation of prescriptions improves the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The results obtained provide evidence of the importance of pharmaceutical review of such prescriptions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA\",\"volume\":\"49 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 304-307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634325000273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130634325000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluación de la prescripción de sulfametoxazol-trimetoprima y optimización posológica en un hospital de tercer nivel
Objective
Evaluate the impact on improving the appropriateness of prescribing following a pharmaceutical intervention based on the review and optimisation of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim prescriptions.
Methods
A before-after intervention study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. The first period, or intervention period, was prospective and ran from September 2021 to January 2022. The second or post-intervention period was retrospective and covered the period March-December 2022.
In case of discrepancy between indication and prescribed and recommended dosage, the physician was notified and the degree of acceptance was recorded. In the post-intervention period, we retrospectively analysed the adequacy of the dosage, checking whether any intervention had been carried out by the Pharmacy Department. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test.
Results
During the intervention period, 69 prescriptions were analysed, and 18 were found to be inappropriate (26%), 12 related to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection. In the post-intervention period, 129 prescriptions were reviewed, and 12 were considered inadequate (9%). Statistical analysis of the results obtained in both periods (18/69 and 12/129) showed statistically significant differences (p = 0.0082).
Conclusions
Pharmaceutical intervention in the review and optimisation of prescriptions improves the use of sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The results obtained provide evidence of the importance of pharmaceutical review of such prescriptions.
期刊介绍:
Una gran revista para acceder a los mejores artículos originales y revisiones de la farmacoterapia actual. Además, es Órgano de expresión científica de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria, y está indexada en Index Medicus/Medline, EMBASE/Excerpta Médica, Alert, Internacional Pharmaceutical Abstracts y SCOPUS.