局部麻醉方式对射频小关节面去神经支配结果的影响。

Q4 Medicine
P G Mytyga, Sh Sh Magomedov
{"title":"局部麻醉方式对射频小关节面去神经支配结果的影响。","authors":"P G Mytyga, Sh Sh Magomedov","doi":"10.17116/neiro20258902157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the elements of lower back pain is facet syndrome. Radiofrequency facet denervation is an effective minimally invasive method for this pain. There is no consensus regarding local anesthesia method for this manipulation. Researchers believe that introduction of anesthetic before denervation leads to needle displacement and deterioration of effect.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the influence of local anesthesia methods on the results of radiofrequency facet denervation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study included adults with typical pain syndrome who underwent radiofrequency facet denervation L3-S1 between 2022 and 2024. Patients were divided into three groups depending on anesthesia. In the control group («K»), patients did not receive injection of anesthetic in ablation area. In the main groups, patients received injection of anesthetic before (group «A») and after (group «B») denervation. Intensity of pain syndrome during denervation and 24 hours later was assessed using the VAS scale. After 6 months, effectiveness of the procedure was assessed using the SF-36 and ODI.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The study involved 351 people. Of these, 131 ones were excluded for various reasons. Patients were divided into groups: control - 67, group «A» - 87, group «B» - 66 people. Six months after denervation, all patients demonstrate significant reduction in pain syndrome and QoL improvement without significant between-group differences. Pain syndrome during denervation and on the first day after surgery was significantly lower in the group «A».</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Injection of anesthetic before denervation does not affect the result, while this approach significantly reduces pain syndrome during intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":24032,"journal":{"name":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","volume":"89 2","pages":"57-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Influence of local anesthesia methods on the results of radiofrequency facet denervation].\",\"authors\":\"P G Mytyga, Sh Sh Magomedov\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/neiro20258902157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the elements of lower back pain is facet syndrome. Radiofrequency facet denervation is an effective minimally invasive method for this pain. There is no consensus regarding local anesthesia method for this manipulation. Researchers believe that introduction of anesthetic before denervation leads to needle displacement and deterioration of effect.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the influence of local anesthesia methods on the results of radiofrequency facet denervation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study included adults with typical pain syndrome who underwent radiofrequency facet denervation L3-S1 between 2022 and 2024. Patients were divided into three groups depending on anesthesia. In the control group («K»), patients did not receive injection of anesthetic in ablation area. In the main groups, patients received injection of anesthetic before (group «A») and after (group «B») denervation. Intensity of pain syndrome during denervation and 24 hours later was assessed using the VAS scale. After 6 months, effectiveness of the procedure was assessed using the SF-36 and ODI.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The study involved 351 people. Of these, 131 ones were excluded for various reasons. Patients were divided into groups: control - 67, group «A» - 87, group «B» - 66 people. Six months after denervation, all patients demonstrate significant reduction in pain syndrome and QoL improvement without significant between-group differences. Pain syndrome during denervation and on the first day after surgery was significantly lower in the group «A».</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Injection of anesthetic before denervation does not affect the result, while this approach significantly reduces pain syndrome during intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"volume\":\"89 2\",\"pages\":\"57-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20258902157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhurnal voprosy neirokhirurgii imeni N. N. Burdenko","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/neiro20258902157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下背部疼痛的一个因素是关节突综合征。射频小关节突去神经是治疗这种疼痛的一种有效的微创方法。对于这种手法的局部麻醉方法尚无共识。研究人员认为,在去神经支配之前引入麻醉剂会导致针头移位和效果恶化。目的:探讨不同局部麻醉方式对射频小关节突神经切断手术效果的影响。材料和方法:一项单中心回顾性研究纳入了2022年至2024年间接受射频L3-S1关节突神经去神经治疗的典型疼痛综合征成人。根据麻醉情况将患者分为三组。在对照组(«K»)中,患者未在消融区注射麻醉剂。在主要组中,患者在去神经支配前(“A”组)和去神经支配后(“B”组)分别注射麻醉剂。在去神经支配期间和24小时后采用VAS评分评估疼痛综合征的强度。6个月后,使用SF-36和ODI评估手术的有效性。结果和讨论:该研究涉及351人。其中131人因各种原因被排除在外。患者被分为两组:对照组67人,A组87人,B组66人。去神经后6个月,所有患者疼痛症状明显减轻,生活质量明显改善,组间无明显差异。“A”组在去神经支配期间和术后第一天的疼痛综合征明显降低。结论:在去神经支配前注射麻醉剂不影响治疗效果,且干预过程中疼痛综合征明显减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Influence of local anesthesia methods on the results of radiofrequency facet denervation].

Background: One of the elements of lower back pain is facet syndrome. Radiofrequency facet denervation is an effective minimally invasive method for this pain. There is no consensus regarding local anesthesia method for this manipulation. Researchers believe that introduction of anesthetic before denervation leads to needle displacement and deterioration of effect.

Objective: To evaluate the influence of local anesthesia methods on the results of radiofrequency facet denervation.

Material and methods: A single-center retrospective study included adults with typical pain syndrome who underwent radiofrequency facet denervation L3-S1 between 2022 and 2024. Patients were divided into three groups depending on anesthesia. In the control group («K»), patients did not receive injection of anesthetic in ablation area. In the main groups, patients received injection of anesthetic before (group «A») and after (group «B») denervation. Intensity of pain syndrome during denervation and 24 hours later was assessed using the VAS scale. After 6 months, effectiveness of the procedure was assessed using the SF-36 and ODI.

Results and discussion: The study involved 351 people. Of these, 131 ones were excluded for various reasons. Patients were divided into groups: control - 67, group «A» - 87, group «B» - 66 people. Six months after denervation, all patients demonstrate significant reduction in pain syndrome and QoL improvement without significant between-group differences. Pain syndrome during denervation and on the first day after surgery was significantly lower in the group «A».

Conclusion: Injection of anesthetic before denervation does not affect the result, while this approach significantly reduces pain syndrome during intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal. This publication covers the theoretical, practical and organizational problems of modern neurosurgery, the latest advances in the treatment of various diseases of the central and peripheral nervous system. Founded in 1937. English version of the journal translates from Russian version since #1/2013.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信