为什么尊严是人工智能伦理的一个令人不安的概念。

IF 6.7 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Jon Rueda, Txetxu Ausín, Mark Coeckelbergh, Juan Ignacio Del Valle, Francisco Lara, Belén Liedo, Joan Llorca Albareda, Heidi Mertes, Robert Ranisch, Vera Lúcia Raposo, Bernd C Stahl, Murilo Vilaça, Íñigo de Miguel
{"title":"为什么尊严是人工智能伦理的一个令人不安的概念。","authors":"Jon Rueda, Txetxu Ausín, Mark Coeckelbergh, Juan Ignacio Del Valle, Francisco Lara, Belén Liedo, Joan Llorca Albareda, Heidi Mertes, Robert Ranisch, Vera Lúcia Raposo, Bernd C Stahl, Murilo Vilaça, Íñigo de Miguel","doi":"10.1016/j.patter.2025.101207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of dignity is proliferating in ethical, legal, and policy discussions of AI, yet dignity is an elusive concept with multiple philosophical interpretations. The authors argue that the unspecific and uncritical employment of the notion of dignity can be counterproductive for AI ethics.</p>","PeriodicalId":36242,"journal":{"name":"Patterns","volume":"6 3","pages":"101207"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why dignity is a troubling concept for AI ethics.\",\"authors\":\"Jon Rueda, Txetxu Ausín, Mark Coeckelbergh, Juan Ignacio Del Valle, Francisco Lara, Belén Liedo, Joan Llorca Albareda, Heidi Mertes, Robert Ranisch, Vera Lúcia Raposo, Bernd C Stahl, Murilo Vilaça, Íñigo de Miguel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.patter.2025.101207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The concept of dignity is proliferating in ethical, legal, and policy discussions of AI, yet dignity is an elusive concept with multiple philosophical interpretations. The authors argue that the unspecific and uncritical employment of the notion of dignity can be counterproductive for AI ethics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patterns\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"101207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963102/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patterns\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patterns","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尊严的概念在人工智能的伦理、法律和政策讨论中激增,但尊严是一个难以捉摸的概念,有多种哲学解释。作者认为,不具体和不加批判地使用尊严概念可能会对人工智能伦理产生反作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why dignity is a troubling concept for AI ethics.

The concept of dignity is proliferating in ethical, legal, and policy discussions of AI, yet dignity is an elusive concept with multiple philosophical interpretations. The authors argue that the unspecific and uncritical employment of the notion of dignity can be counterproductive for AI ethics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Patterns
Patterns Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信