一项质量改进倡议,旨在加强IDEA框架中的公平、多样性和包容性以及反种族主义考虑。

Q3 Medicine
Rosalind Abdool, Dianne Godkin, Lauren Honan, Angela Gamage
{"title":"一项质量改进倡议,旨在加强IDEA框架中的公平、多样性和包容性以及反种族主义考虑。","authors":"Rosalind Abdool, Dianne Godkin, Lauren Honan, Angela Gamage","doi":"10.1177/08404704251329026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trillium Health Partners' (THP's) Regional Ethics Program led a quality improvement project to explicitly address equity, diversity, and inclusion and anti-racism and anti-oppression in its IDEA: Ethical Decision-Making Framework. Various groups, encompassing diverse backgrounds and lived experiences, completed a short survey including demographic and open-ended questions. Survey responses revealed gaps within the IDEA Framework and recommendations for modifications (e.g., editing language to be more accessible and inclusive, placing a greater focus on lived experience). Several themes emerged including explicitness, simplification, and continued learning. This work is of particular interest to health leaders as it aims to expose where bias, power, and privilege exist when addressing ethical dilemmas within healthcare systems. It explicitly addresses implicit bias, discrimination and harassment, reflexivity in care, as well as re-defines and re-imagines ethical principles (e.g., accountability, diversity, inclusivity, justice, relationships, and trust).</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"8404704251329026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quality improvement initiative to strengthen equity, diversity and inclusion and anti-racism considerations in the IDEA Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Rosalind Abdool, Dianne Godkin, Lauren Honan, Angela Gamage\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08404704251329026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Trillium Health Partners' (THP's) Regional Ethics Program led a quality improvement project to explicitly address equity, diversity, and inclusion and anti-racism and anti-oppression in its IDEA: Ethical Decision-Making Framework. Various groups, encompassing diverse backgrounds and lived experiences, completed a short survey including demographic and open-ended questions. Survey responses revealed gaps within the IDEA Framework and recommendations for modifications (e.g., editing language to be more accessible and inclusive, placing a greater focus on lived experience). Several themes emerged including explicitness, simplification, and continued learning. This work is of particular interest to health leaders as it aims to expose where bias, power, and privilege exist when addressing ethical dilemmas within healthcare systems. It explicitly addresses implicit bias, discrimination and harassment, reflexivity in care, as well as re-defines and re-imagines ethical principles (e.g., accountability, diversity, inclusivity, justice, relationships, and trust).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8404704251329026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Management Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251329026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704251329026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Trillium Health Partners (THP)的区域道德项目领导了一个质量改进项目,在其IDEA:道德决策框架中明确解决了公平、多样性、包容性以及反种族主义和反压迫问题。不同的小组,包括不同的背景和生活经历,完成了一个简短的调查,包括人口统计和开放式问题。调查回复揭示了IDEA框架中的差距和修改建议(例如,编辑语言使其更易于理解和包容,更加关注生活体验)。几个主题出现了,包括明确,简化和持续学习。这项工作对卫生领导人特别感兴趣,因为它旨在揭露在解决卫生保健系统内的道德困境时存在偏见、权力和特权的地方。它明确解决了隐性偏见、歧视和骚扰、护理中的反身性,并重新定义和设想了伦理原则(如问责制、多样性、包容性、正义、关系和信任)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A quality improvement initiative to strengthen equity, diversity and inclusion and anti-racism considerations in the IDEA Framework.

Trillium Health Partners' (THP's) Regional Ethics Program led a quality improvement project to explicitly address equity, diversity, and inclusion and anti-racism and anti-oppression in its IDEA: Ethical Decision-Making Framework. Various groups, encompassing diverse backgrounds and lived experiences, completed a short survey including demographic and open-ended questions. Survey responses revealed gaps within the IDEA Framework and recommendations for modifications (e.g., editing language to be more accessible and inclusive, placing a greater focus on lived experience). Several themes emerged including explicitness, simplification, and continued learning. This work is of particular interest to health leaders as it aims to expose where bias, power, and privilege exist when addressing ethical dilemmas within healthcare systems. It explicitly addresses implicit bias, discrimination and harassment, reflexivity in care, as well as re-defines and re-imagines ethical principles (e.g., accountability, diversity, inclusivity, justice, relationships, and trust).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信