{"title":"鼻窦内植入物与其他部位植入物的比较。","authors":"Yung-Ting Hsu, Ida Zarrabi, Saumya Prajapati, Shale Ninneman, Diane Daubert, I-Chung Wang, Nelly Badr","doi":"10.3290/j.qi.b6120629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in marginal bone level and survival rates of implants placed in lateral-window sinus floor elevation (LSFE) sites compared to other sites.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients with a history of LSFE and subsequent implant placement were identified. Clinical and radiographic data were collected by two calibrated examiners and divided into three cohorts for the analysis, including (1) implants placed in the LSFE-grafted sinus, (2) implants placed in the maxilla at sites other than grafted sinus, and (3) implants placed in the mandible. Implant survival rate and marginal bone level were recorded and calculated. The potential influences of several host-, implant-, and surgery-related factors on implant survival rate and marginal bone level were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>427 implants from 99 patients (63.8 ±12.5 years) with an average follow-up period of 32.3 ± 29.2 months were analyzed. The cumulative implant survival rate at the grafted sinuses was 93.63%. Mean marginal bone level was 0.44 ± 0.79 mm, 0.84 ± 1.21 mm, and 0.85 ± 1.16 mm for implants in group 1 (n = 142), group 2 (n = 129), and group 3 (n = 147) (P = .01). The majority of marginal bone loss occurred within the first 12 months after implant placement. The status of smoking and periodontal disease did not impact implant survival rate or marginal bone level for any group (P > .05). Neither sinus membrane perforation nor grafting materials affected marginal bone level (P > .05) in group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilization of LSFE and the presence of sinus membrane perforation during LSFE had no negative impact on implant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20831,"journal":{"name":"Quintessence international","volume":"0 0","pages":"344-353"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of implants placed in grafted sinuses in comparison with other regions.\",\"authors\":\"Yung-Ting Hsu, Ida Zarrabi, Saumya Prajapati, Shale Ninneman, Diane Daubert, I-Chung Wang, Nelly Badr\",\"doi\":\"10.3290/j.qi.b6120629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in marginal bone level and survival rates of implants placed in lateral-window sinus floor elevation (LSFE) sites compared to other sites.</p><p><strong>Method and materials: </strong>Patients with a history of LSFE and subsequent implant placement were identified. Clinical and radiographic data were collected by two calibrated examiners and divided into three cohorts for the analysis, including (1) implants placed in the LSFE-grafted sinus, (2) implants placed in the maxilla at sites other than grafted sinus, and (3) implants placed in the mandible. Implant survival rate and marginal bone level were recorded and calculated. The potential influences of several host-, implant-, and surgery-related factors on implant survival rate and marginal bone level were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>427 implants from 99 patients (63.8 ±12.5 years) with an average follow-up period of 32.3 ± 29.2 months were analyzed. The cumulative implant survival rate at the grafted sinuses was 93.63%. Mean marginal bone level was 0.44 ± 0.79 mm, 0.84 ± 1.21 mm, and 0.85 ± 1.16 mm for implants in group 1 (n = 142), group 2 (n = 129), and group 3 (n = 147) (P = .01). The majority of marginal bone loss occurred within the first 12 months after implant placement. The status of smoking and periodontal disease did not impact implant survival rate or marginal bone level for any group (P > .05). Neither sinus membrane perforation nor grafting materials affected marginal bone level (P > .05) in group 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The utilization of LSFE and the presence of sinus membrane perforation during LSFE had no negative impact on implant outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quintessence international\",\"volume\":\"0 0\",\"pages\":\"344-353\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quintessence international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6120629\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quintessence international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b6120629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of implants placed in grafted sinuses in comparison with other regions.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in marginal bone level and survival rates of implants placed in lateral-window sinus floor elevation (LSFE) sites compared to other sites.
Method and materials: Patients with a history of LSFE and subsequent implant placement were identified. Clinical and radiographic data were collected by two calibrated examiners and divided into three cohorts for the analysis, including (1) implants placed in the LSFE-grafted sinus, (2) implants placed in the maxilla at sites other than grafted sinus, and (3) implants placed in the mandible. Implant survival rate and marginal bone level were recorded and calculated. The potential influences of several host-, implant-, and surgery-related factors on implant survival rate and marginal bone level were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.
Results: 427 implants from 99 patients (63.8 ±12.5 years) with an average follow-up period of 32.3 ± 29.2 months were analyzed. The cumulative implant survival rate at the grafted sinuses was 93.63%. Mean marginal bone level was 0.44 ± 0.79 mm, 0.84 ± 1.21 mm, and 0.85 ± 1.16 mm for implants in group 1 (n = 142), group 2 (n = 129), and group 3 (n = 147) (P = .01). The majority of marginal bone loss occurred within the first 12 months after implant placement. The status of smoking and periodontal disease did not impact implant survival rate or marginal bone level for any group (P > .05). Neither sinus membrane perforation nor grafting materials affected marginal bone level (P > .05) in group 1.
Conclusion: The utilization of LSFE and the presence of sinus membrane perforation during LSFE had no negative impact on implant outcomes.
期刊介绍:
QI has a new contemporary design but continues its time-honored tradition of serving the needs of the general practitioner with clinically relevant articles that are scientifically based. Dr Eli Eliav and his editorial board are dedicated to practitioners worldwide through the presentation of high-level research, useful clinical procedures, and educational short case reports and clinical notes. Rigorous but timely manuscript review is the first order of business in their quest to publish a high-quality selection of articles in the multiple specialties and disciplines that encompass dentistry.