{"title":"MUC1和XBP1一致表达在多发性骨髓瘤中的预后意义:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Sheerien Kareem Rajput, Khurram Minhas, Iqbal Azam, Sadia Habib, Usman Shaikh, El-Nasir Lalani","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0320934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of malignant plasma cells (PC) with poor survival. Disease progression and treatment relapse are attributed to MM cancer stem cells (CSCs) and signaling molecules such as MUC1 and XBP1. The study aimed to determine the prognostic value of expression of CSC-associated biomarkers, MUC1 and XBP1 in MM, which has not been explored previously. In this study, we determined the immunohistochemical expression of CSC markers (ALDH1, CD117, and CD34), MUC1, and XBP1 in 128 MM formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded bone marrow archival blocks. The expression of biomarkers was assessed for association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival. Descriptive analysis, survival plots and crude association between outcome and independent variables were assessed using Kaplan Meier and Log rank test. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using simple and multiple Cox regression models. The results are reported as crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Expression of ALDH1 and CD117 was found in 51% and 48% of the tumors, respectively. ALDH1 expression was associated with 1.83 years of reduced survival for patients with CD56-negative tumors. MUC1 expression was observed in 62%, whereas XBP1 was expressed in 48% of tumors. Combinatorial group analysis of XBP1 and MUC1 stratified patients into two prognostic groups. Cases with tumors negative for expression of MUC1 and XBP1 (XBP1-/ MUC1-) were categorized as a good prognostic group with increased survival of 3.42 years compared to cases with tumors expressing both (Worst prognosis, XBP1 + /MUC1+). Concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in MM defines a subset of patients with adverse outcomes. The adjusted hazard ratio showed a four-fold increased risk of mortality associated with the concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in patients > 65 years of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 4","pages":"e0320934"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic implications of MUC1 and XBP1 concordant expression in multiple myeloma: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Sheerien Kareem Rajput, Khurram Minhas, Iqbal Azam, Sadia Habib, Usman Shaikh, El-Nasir Lalani\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0320934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of malignant plasma cells (PC) with poor survival. Disease progression and treatment relapse are attributed to MM cancer stem cells (CSCs) and signaling molecules such as MUC1 and XBP1. The study aimed to determine the prognostic value of expression of CSC-associated biomarkers, MUC1 and XBP1 in MM, which has not been explored previously. In this study, we determined the immunohistochemical expression of CSC markers (ALDH1, CD117, and CD34), MUC1, and XBP1 in 128 MM formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded bone marrow archival blocks. The expression of biomarkers was assessed for association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival. Descriptive analysis, survival plots and crude association between outcome and independent variables were assessed using Kaplan Meier and Log rank test. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using simple and multiple Cox regression models. The results are reported as crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Expression of ALDH1 and CD117 was found in 51% and 48% of the tumors, respectively. ALDH1 expression was associated with 1.83 years of reduced survival for patients with CD56-negative tumors. MUC1 expression was observed in 62%, whereas XBP1 was expressed in 48% of tumors. Combinatorial group analysis of XBP1 and MUC1 stratified patients into two prognostic groups. Cases with tumors negative for expression of MUC1 and XBP1 (XBP1-/ MUC1-) were categorized as a good prognostic group with increased survival of 3.42 years compared to cases with tumors expressing both (Worst prognosis, XBP1 + /MUC1+). Concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in MM defines a subset of patients with adverse outcomes. The adjusted hazard ratio showed a four-fold increased risk of mortality associated with the concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in patients > 65 years of age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"e0320934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11967961/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320934\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320934","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prognostic implications of MUC1 and XBP1 concordant expression in multiple myeloma: A retrospective study.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of malignant plasma cells (PC) with poor survival. Disease progression and treatment relapse are attributed to MM cancer stem cells (CSCs) and signaling molecules such as MUC1 and XBP1. The study aimed to determine the prognostic value of expression of CSC-associated biomarkers, MUC1 and XBP1 in MM, which has not been explored previously. In this study, we determined the immunohistochemical expression of CSC markers (ALDH1, CD117, and CD34), MUC1, and XBP1 in 128 MM formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded bone marrow archival blocks. The expression of biomarkers was assessed for association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival. Descriptive analysis, survival plots and crude association between outcome and independent variables were assessed using Kaplan Meier and Log rank test. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using simple and multiple Cox regression models. The results are reported as crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Expression of ALDH1 and CD117 was found in 51% and 48% of the tumors, respectively. ALDH1 expression was associated with 1.83 years of reduced survival for patients with CD56-negative tumors. MUC1 expression was observed in 62%, whereas XBP1 was expressed in 48% of tumors. Combinatorial group analysis of XBP1 and MUC1 stratified patients into two prognostic groups. Cases with tumors negative for expression of MUC1 and XBP1 (XBP1-/ MUC1-) were categorized as a good prognostic group with increased survival of 3.42 years compared to cases with tumors expressing both (Worst prognosis, XBP1 + /MUC1+). Concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in MM defines a subset of patients with adverse outcomes. The adjusted hazard ratio showed a four-fold increased risk of mortality associated with the concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in patients > 65 years of age.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage