比较 Wassel IV 型拇指多指畸形重建的手术方法:K 线固定与非 K 线固定。

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006664
Chi Peng, Che-Hsiung Lee, Shih-Heng Chen, Ren-Wen Huang, Cheng-Hung Lin, Yu-Te Lin, Chung-Chen Hsu
{"title":"比较 Wassel IV 型拇指多指畸形重建的手术方法:K 线固定与非 K 线固定。","authors":"Chi Peng, Che-Hsiung Lee, Shih-Heng Chen, Ren-Wen Huang, Cheng-Hung Lin, Yu-Te Lin, Chung-Chen Hsu","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wassel type IV is a common radial polydactyly anomaly characterized by duplication of the proximal phalanges at the metacarpophalangeal joint (MPJ). The primary goal of reconstructive surgery is to achieve a fully functional thumb with appropriate mobility, dimensions, and stable MPJ. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of MPJ reconstruction using either K-wire or non-K-wire fixation for Wassel type IV polydactyly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 78 thumbs from 77 patients with Wassel Type IV polydactyly between April 2011 and December 2022. In addition to standard excision of duplicates, MPJ collateral ligament repair, and thenar muscle reattachment using a periosteal sleeve flap, the study analyzed the application of tendon transfer, soft-tissue augmentation, and K-wire fixation. Outcomes were evaluated using Tada score classification, MPJ deviation angle, and range of motion. Complications were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes based on Tada classification between the K-wire and non-K-wire fixation groups. Favorable outcomes were achieved in 76.3% and 84.2% of the K-wire and non-K-wire fixation groups, respectively. Although there was a significantly higher tissue augmentation rate in the K-wire fixation group, there were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative MPJ angles between the 2 groups. Complications associated with K-wire fixation included pin tract infection (10.2%), migration (10.2%), and maceration (5.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both K-wire and non-K-wire fixation approaches for Wassel type IV polydactyly yielded favorable subjective and objective outcomes. However, complications associated with K-wire fixation should be considered when determining the surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6664"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Surgical Approaches for Thumb Polydactyly Reconstruction in Wassel Type IV: K-wire Fixation Versus Non-K-wire Fixation.\",\"authors\":\"Chi Peng, Che-Hsiung Lee, Shih-Heng Chen, Ren-Wen Huang, Cheng-Hung Lin, Yu-Te Lin, Chung-Chen Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wassel type IV is a common radial polydactyly anomaly characterized by duplication of the proximal phalanges at the metacarpophalangeal joint (MPJ). The primary goal of reconstructive surgery is to achieve a fully functional thumb with appropriate mobility, dimensions, and stable MPJ. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of MPJ reconstruction using either K-wire or non-K-wire fixation for Wassel type IV polydactyly.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 78 thumbs from 77 patients with Wassel Type IV polydactyly between April 2011 and December 2022. In addition to standard excision of duplicates, MPJ collateral ligament repair, and thenar muscle reattachment using a periosteal sleeve flap, the study analyzed the application of tendon transfer, soft-tissue augmentation, and K-wire fixation. Outcomes were evaluated using Tada score classification, MPJ deviation angle, and range of motion. Complications were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes based on Tada classification between the K-wire and non-K-wire fixation groups. Favorable outcomes were achieved in 76.3% and 84.2% of the K-wire and non-K-wire fixation groups, respectively. Although there was a significantly higher tissue augmentation rate in the K-wire fixation group, there were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative MPJ angles between the 2 groups. Complications associated with K-wire fixation included pin tract infection (10.2%), migration (10.2%), and maceration (5.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both K-wire and non-K-wire fixation approaches for Wassel type IV polydactyly yielded favorable subjective and objective outcomes. However, complications associated with K-wire fixation should be considered when determining the surgical approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"e6664\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Surgical Approaches for Thumb Polydactyly Reconstruction in Wassel Type IV: K-wire Fixation Versus Non-K-wire Fixation.

Background: Wassel type IV is a common radial polydactyly anomaly characterized by duplication of the proximal phalanges at the metacarpophalangeal joint (MPJ). The primary goal of reconstructive surgery is to achieve a fully functional thumb with appropriate mobility, dimensions, and stable MPJ. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of MPJ reconstruction using either K-wire or non-K-wire fixation for Wassel type IV polydactyly.

Methods: The study included 78 thumbs from 77 patients with Wassel Type IV polydactyly between April 2011 and December 2022. In addition to standard excision of duplicates, MPJ collateral ligament repair, and thenar muscle reattachment using a periosteal sleeve flap, the study analyzed the application of tendon transfer, soft-tissue augmentation, and K-wire fixation. Outcomes were evaluated using Tada score classification, MPJ deviation angle, and range of motion. Complications were also documented.

Results: There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes based on Tada classification between the K-wire and non-K-wire fixation groups. Favorable outcomes were achieved in 76.3% and 84.2% of the K-wire and non-K-wire fixation groups, respectively. Although there was a significantly higher tissue augmentation rate in the K-wire fixation group, there were no significant differences in preoperative and postoperative MPJ angles between the 2 groups. Complications associated with K-wire fixation included pin tract infection (10.2%), migration (10.2%), and maceration (5.1%).

Conclusions: Both K-wire and non-K-wire fixation approaches for Wassel type IV polydactyly yielded favorable subjective and objective outcomes. However, complications associated with K-wire fixation should be considered when determining the surgical approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信