氨苄西林及其前药巴氨苄西林在鸡和火鸡体内的药代动力学和口服生物利用度。

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Kerem Guzelaydin, Yigit Gunes, Ceren Anlas, Murat Yildirim
{"title":"氨苄西林及其前药巴氨苄西林在鸡和火鸡体内的药代动力学和口服生物利用度。","authors":"Kerem Guzelaydin, Yigit Gunes, Ceren Anlas, Murat Yildirim","doi":"10.4142/jvs.24268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Reports comparing the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin (AMP) and its prodrug bacampicillin (BAC) in poultry are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AMP and BAC in chickens and turkeys after intravenous (i.v.) or oral administrations at a single dosage of 25 mg/kg body weight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty chickens and 30 turkeys were divided into three groups (n = 10). Blood samples (0.5-0.7 mL) were collected from the subcutenea ulnar vein at pre-assigned times up to 12 h. The AMP and BAC plasma concentrations were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector. The data were analyzed using noncompartmental methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the curve from 0 to 12 h, apparent total systemic, the apparent volume of distribution, and mean residence time differed significantly according to the administration routes. The terminal elimination half-life values for the i.v. AMP, oral AMP, and oral BAC routes were 1.81, 3.64, and 5.39 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0249, <i>p</i> < 0.05), respectively, in chickens, and 2.44, 2.53, and 5.5 h (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), respectively, in turkeys. The bioavailability for the oral AMP and oral BAC groups in chickens was 25.9% and 44.6%, respectively. Similarly, in turkeys, the bioavailability was 19.1% and 44.2% for the oral AMP and oral BAC groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The oral route of BAC with good bioavailability can be preferred for treating various conditions. On the other hand, further studies will be needed to determine the clinical efficacy of BAC during bacterial infections and the pharmacokinetics and safety of repeated administration in poultry.</p>","PeriodicalId":17557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Science","volume":"26 2","pages":"e21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of ampicillin and its prodrug bacampicillin in chickens and turkeys.\",\"authors\":\"Kerem Guzelaydin, Yigit Gunes, Ceren Anlas, Murat Yildirim\",\"doi\":\"10.4142/jvs.24268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Reports comparing the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin (AMP) and its prodrug bacampicillin (BAC) in poultry are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AMP and BAC in chickens and turkeys after intravenous (i.v.) or oral administrations at a single dosage of 25 mg/kg body weight.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty chickens and 30 turkeys were divided into three groups (n = 10). Blood samples (0.5-0.7 mL) were collected from the subcutenea ulnar vein at pre-assigned times up to 12 h. The AMP and BAC plasma concentrations were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector. The data were analyzed using noncompartmental methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The area under the curve from 0 to 12 h, apparent total systemic, the apparent volume of distribution, and mean residence time differed significantly according to the administration routes. The terminal elimination half-life values for the i.v. AMP, oral AMP, and oral BAC routes were 1.81, 3.64, and 5.39 h (<i>p</i> = 0.0249, <i>p</i> < 0.05), respectively, in chickens, and 2.44, 2.53, and 5.5 h (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), respectively, in turkeys. The bioavailability for the oral AMP and oral BAC groups in chickens was 25.9% and 44.6%, respectively. Similarly, in turkeys, the bioavailability was 19.1% and 44.2% for the oral AMP and oral BAC groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The oral route of BAC with good bioavailability can be preferred for treating various conditions. On the other hand, further studies will be needed to determine the clinical efficacy of BAC during bacterial infections and the pharmacokinetics and safety of repeated administration in poultry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"e21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972936/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.24268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.24268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:比较氨苄青霉素(AMP)和它的前药bacampicillin (BAC)在家禽体内的药代动力学的报道很少。目的:本研究以25mg /kg体重单次静脉或口服给药,评价AMP和BAC在鸡和火鸡体内的药代动力学特征。方法:鸡30只,火鸡30只,随机分为3组,每组10只。在预先设定的时间(最长12小时)从尺皮下静脉采集血液样本(0.5-0.7 mL)。使用荧光检测器和高效液相色谱分析AMP和BAC的血浆浓度。数据采用非区隔方法进行分析。结果:不同给药途径在0 ~ 12 h的曲线下面积、表观全身总量、表观分布容积、平均停留时间均有显著差异。鸡经静脉注射AMP、口服AMP和口服BAC的最终消除半衰期分别为1.81、3.64和5.39 h (p = 0.0249, p < 0.05),火鸡为2.44、2.53和5.5 h (p < 0.0001)。口服AMP组和口服BAC组鸡的生物利用度分别为25.9%和44.6%。同样,在火鸡中,口服AMP和口服BAC组的生物利用度分别为19.1%和44.2%。结论及意义:生物利用度良好的口服BAC可作为治疗多种疾病的首选途径。另一方面,还需要进一步的研究来确定BAC在细菌感染期间的临床疗效,以及在家禽中反复给药的药代动力学和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of ampicillin and its prodrug bacampicillin in chickens and turkeys.

Importance: Reports comparing the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin (AMP) and its prodrug bacampicillin (BAC) in poultry are scarce.

Objective: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic characteristics of AMP and BAC in chickens and turkeys after intravenous (i.v.) or oral administrations at a single dosage of 25 mg/kg body weight.

Methods: Thirty chickens and 30 turkeys were divided into three groups (n = 10). Blood samples (0.5-0.7 mL) were collected from the subcutenea ulnar vein at pre-assigned times up to 12 h. The AMP and BAC plasma concentrations were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with a fluorescence detector. The data were analyzed using noncompartmental methods.

Results: The area under the curve from 0 to 12 h, apparent total systemic, the apparent volume of distribution, and mean residence time differed significantly according to the administration routes. The terminal elimination half-life values for the i.v. AMP, oral AMP, and oral BAC routes were 1.81, 3.64, and 5.39 h (p = 0.0249, p < 0.05), respectively, in chickens, and 2.44, 2.53, and 5.5 h (p < 0.0001), respectively, in turkeys. The bioavailability for the oral AMP and oral BAC groups in chickens was 25.9% and 44.6%, respectively. Similarly, in turkeys, the bioavailability was 19.1% and 44.2% for the oral AMP and oral BAC groups, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: The oral route of BAC with good bioavailability can be preferred for treating various conditions. On the other hand, further studies will be needed to determine the clinical efficacy of BAC during bacterial infections and the pharmacokinetics and safety of repeated administration in poultry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Science
Journal of Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Science (J Vet Sci) is devoted to the advancement and dissemination of scientific knowledge concerning veterinary sciences and related academic disciplines. It is an international journal indexed in the Thomson Scientific Web of Science, SCI-EXPANDED, Sci Search, BIOSIS Previews, Biological Abstracts, Focus on: Veterinary Science & Medicine, Zoological Record, PubMed /MEDLINE, Index Medicus, Pubmed Central, CAB Abstracts / Index Veterinarius, EBSCO, AGRIS and AGRICOLA. This journal published in English by the Korean Society of Veterinary Science (KSVS) being distributed worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信