同种异体筋膜保存方法的比较。

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Jiyoung Park, Mu-Young Kim, Hun-Young Yoon
{"title":"同种异体筋膜保存方法的比较。","authors":"Jiyoung Park, Mu-Young Kim, Hun-Young Yoon","doi":"10.4142/jvs.24276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Research on tissue preservation, including cortical bone, skin, nerves, and vessels in glycerol and cortical bone in honey, has shown positive results. On the other hand, relatively few studies have been performed on fascia preservation, and comparisons between different fascia preservation methods remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study compared the biomechanical properties of five different methods of preserving fascia lata.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The control group underwent biomechanical testing immediately after decellularization, while the other five groups were stored in glycerol, honey, deep freezer, lyophilizer, and liquid nitrogen for 30 days. The ultimate load, elongation at failure, and stiffness for each group were determined from a load-elongation curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparison of the ultimate load showed that the control group had the highest value, followed by the glycerol group. The glycerol group was the only group that did not show a significant difference from the control group, while all the other groups showed a significantly lower ultimate load. A comparison of elongation at failure revealed the glycerol group to have the highest value at failure among all groups and was significantly higher than the deep freeze, honey, and cryopreservation groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Glycerol can be used as an effective method for preserving fascia allografts because the resulting allografts show a similar ultimate load to the control group and the highest mean elongation at failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":17557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Science","volume":"26 2","pages":"e13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of five preservation methods for fascia allograft.\",\"authors\":\"Jiyoung Park, Mu-Young Kim, Hun-Young Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.4142/jvs.24276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Research on tissue preservation, including cortical bone, skin, nerves, and vessels in glycerol and cortical bone in honey, has shown positive results. On the other hand, relatively few studies have been performed on fascia preservation, and comparisons between different fascia preservation methods remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This <i>in vitro</i> study compared the biomechanical properties of five different methods of preserving fascia lata.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The control group underwent biomechanical testing immediately after decellularization, while the other five groups were stored in glycerol, honey, deep freezer, lyophilizer, and liquid nitrogen for 30 days. The ultimate load, elongation at failure, and stiffness for each group were determined from a load-elongation curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparison of the ultimate load showed that the control group had the highest value, followed by the glycerol group. The glycerol group was the only group that did not show a significant difference from the control group, while all the other groups showed a significantly lower ultimate load. A comparison of elongation at failure revealed the glycerol group to have the highest value at failure among all groups and was significantly higher than the deep freeze, honey, and cryopreservation groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Glycerol can be used as an effective method for preserving fascia allografts because the resulting allografts show a similar ultimate load to the control group and the highest mean elongation at failure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Science\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"e13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.24276\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.24276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:组织保存的研究,包括皮质骨、皮肤、神经和血管在甘油和皮质骨在蜂蜜中,已经显示出积极的结果。另一方面,关于筋膜保存的研究相对较少,不同筋膜保存方法之间的比较也很少。目的:比较五种不同的阔筋膜保存方法的生物力学特性。方法:对照组在脱细胞后立即进行生物力学试验,其余5组分别在甘油、蜂蜜、深度冷冻、冻干机、液氮中保存30 d。每组的极限荷载、破坏伸长率和刚度均由荷载-伸长率曲线确定。结果:极限负荷比较,对照组最大,甘油组次之。甘油组是唯一没有显示出与对照组有显著差异的组,而所有其他组的极限负荷都明显较低。失败时伸长率的比较显示甘油组在所有组中具有最高的失败值,并且显著高于深度冷冻,蜂蜜和低温保存组。结论及相关性:甘油可以作为保存同种异体筋膜移植物的有效方法,因为所得到的同种异体移植物显示出与对照组相似的最终负荷和最高的平均失败伸长率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of five preservation methods for fascia allograft.

Importance: Research on tissue preservation, including cortical bone, skin, nerves, and vessels in glycerol and cortical bone in honey, has shown positive results. On the other hand, relatively few studies have been performed on fascia preservation, and comparisons between different fascia preservation methods remain scarce.

Objective: This in vitro study compared the biomechanical properties of five different methods of preserving fascia lata.

Methods: The control group underwent biomechanical testing immediately after decellularization, while the other five groups were stored in glycerol, honey, deep freezer, lyophilizer, and liquid nitrogen for 30 days. The ultimate load, elongation at failure, and stiffness for each group were determined from a load-elongation curve.

Results: A comparison of the ultimate load showed that the control group had the highest value, followed by the glycerol group. The glycerol group was the only group that did not show a significant difference from the control group, while all the other groups showed a significantly lower ultimate load. A comparison of elongation at failure revealed the glycerol group to have the highest value at failure among all groups and was significantly higher than the deep freeze, honey, and cryopreservation groups.

Conclusions and relevance: Glycerol can be used as an effective method for preserving fascia allografts because the resulting allografts show a similar ultimate load to the control group and the highest mean elongation at failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Science
Journal of Veterinary Science 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Science (J Vet Sci) is devoted to the advancement and dissemination of scientific knowledge concerning veterinary sciences and related academic disciplines. It is an international journal indexed in the Thomson Scientific Web of Science, SCI-EXPANDED, Sci Search, BIOSIS Previews, Biological Abstracts, Focus on: Veterinary Science & Medicine, Zoological Record, PubMed /MEDLINE, Index Medicus, Pubmed Central, CAB Abstracts / Index Veterinarius, EBSCO, AGRIS and AGRICOLA. This journal published in English by the Korean Society of Veterinary Science (KSVS) being distributed worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信