rtt驱动的工作流程在cbct引导下部分乳房适应性放疗中的可行性和影响。

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
David Parsons, Sean Domal, Eric Chambers, Denise Salazar, Justin Visak, Mona Arbab, Francis Holgado, Xingzhe Li, Chinasa Okoro, Narine Wandrey, Zohaib Iqbal, Prasanna Alluri, Bin Cai, Hannah Keen, Jennifer Cleaton, Andrew Godley, David Sher, Shahed Badiyan, Asal Rahimi, Mu-Han Lin
{"title":"rtt驱动的工作流程在cbct引导下部分乳房适应性放疗中的可行性和影响。","authors":"David Parsons, Sean Domal, Eric Chambers, Denise Salazar, Justin Visak, Mona Arbab, Francis Holgado, Xingzhe Li, Chinasa Okoro, Narine Wandrey, Zohaib Iqbal, Prasanna Alluri, Bin Cai, Hannah Keen, Jennifer Cleaton, Andrew Godley, David Sher, Shahed Badiyan, Asal Rahimi, Mu-Han Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cone beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) allows significantly smaller planning target volume margins for patients treated with adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation. However, this approach places increased demands on the treatment team, particularly physicians. We hypothesize that with appropriate training, physicians' involvement at the treatment console can be reduced by delegating contouring and planning tasks to radiation therapy technologists (RTTs) with a physicist copilot without reducing treatment quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study designed to evaluate an RTT-driven workflow, 23 patients undergoing adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation were included, with 2 treatment plans generated per adaptive fraction. The first plan used contours edited by RTTs under physicist supervision (without physician oversight), and the second plan used contours edited by physicians. RTT-modified plans were compared with physician-edited contours for target coverage (V<sub>100%</sub> and V<sub>95%</sub>) and organ-at-risk constraints. The Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance were calculated for target volumes. Following confirmation of RTT contour quality, we initiated the \"remote physician\" workflow to further reduce physician demand in the on-couch process. Physician review time was recorded to estimate the reduction in time required for ART. The number of treated fractions before and after implementation was also tracked.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 103 adaptive fractions showed a mean Dice coefficient of 0.96 for the tumor bed. The mean Hausdorff distance was 0.6 mm. Differences in planning target volume coverage were -1.0% ± 2.2% and -0.6% ± 1.3% for V<sub>100%</sub> and V<sub>95%</sub>, respectively. Similar metrics for the tumor bed and clinical target volume had differences of <0.4%. Physician time for ART was reduced by 12.3 ± 1.0 minutes per fraction, leading to a 224% increase in ART breast volume at our institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training experienced radiation therapists to perform contouring and planning tasks reduces physician workload without compromising treatment quality during online adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation. Remote contour review ensures ongoing quality and consistency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Impact of a Radiation Therapy Technologist-Driven Workflow for Cone Beam Computed Tomography Guided Partial Breast Adaptive Radiation Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"David Parsons, Sean Domal, Eric Chambers, Denise Salazar, Justin Visak, Mona Arbab, Francis Holgado, Xingzhe Li, Chinasa Okoro, Narine Wandrey, Zohaib Iqbal, Prasanna Alluri, Bin Cai, Hannah Keen, Jennifer Cleaton, Andrew Godley, David Sher, Shahed Badiyan, Asal Rahimi, Mu-Han Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cone beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) allows significantly smaller planning target volume margins for patients treated with adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation. However, this approach places increased demands on the treatment team, particularly physicians. We hypothesize that with appropriate training, physicians' involvement at the treatment console can be reduced by delegating contouring and planning tasks to radiation therapy technologists (RTTs) with a physicist copilot without reducing treatment quality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective study designed to evaluate an RTT-driven workflow, 23 patients undergoing adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation were included, with 2 treatment plans generated per adaptive fraction. The first plan used contours edited by RTTs under physicist supervision (without physician oversight), and the second plan used contours edited by physicians. RTT-modified plans were compared with physician-edited contours for target coverage (V<sub>100%</sub> and V<sub>95%</sub>) and organ-at-risk constraints. The Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance were calculated for target volumes. Following confirmation of RTT contour quality, we initiated the \\\"remote physician\\\" workflow to further reduce physician demand in the on-couch process. Physician review time was recorded to estimate the reduction in time required for ART. The number of treated fractions before and after implementation was also tracked.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of 103 adaptive fractions showed a mean Dice coefficient of 0.96 for the tumor bed. The mean Hausdorff distance was 0.6 mm. Differences in planning target volume coverage were -1.0% ± 2.2% and -0.6% ± 1.3% for V<sub>100%</sub> and V<sub>95%</sub>, respectively. Similar metrics for the tumor bed and clinical target volume had differences of <0.4%. Physician time for ART was reduced by 12.3 ± 1.0 minutes per fraction, leading to a 224% increase in ART breast volume at our institution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Training experienced radiation therapists to perform contouring and planning tasks reduces physician workload without compromising treatment quality during online adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation. Remote contour review ensures ongoing quality and consistency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.055\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.055","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)为自适应立体定向部分乳房放射治疗(A-SPBI)的患者提供了更小的计划靶体积(PTV)边缘。然而,这种方法对治疗团队,尤其是医生提出了更高的要求。我们假设,通过适当的培训,可以通过将轮廓和计划任务委托给放射治疗技术人员(rtt)和物理学家副驾驶来减少医生在治疗控制台的参与,而不会降低治疗质量。材料和方法:在这项旨在评估rtt驱动工作流程的前瞻性研究中,纳入了23例接受A-SPBI的患者,每个适应性分数产生两种治疗方案。第一个计划使用由rtt在物理学家监督下编辑的轮廓(没有医生监督),第二个计划使用由医生编辑的轮廓。将rtt修改方案与医生编辑的轮廓线进行目标覆盖率(V100%和V95%)和器官危险(OAR)限制的比较。计算目标体积的骰子系数和豪斯多夫距离。在确认RTT轮廓质量后,我们启动了“远程医生”工作流程,以进一步减少医生在沙发上的需求。记录医生复查时间以估计ART所需时间的减少。实施前后处理分数的数量也被跟踪。结果:103个自适应组分分析显示,肿瘤床的平均Dice系数为0.96。平均Hausdorff距离为0.6 mm。V100%和V95%的规划目标体积覆盖率差异分别为-1.0±2.2%和-0.6±1.3%。结论:在在线A-SPBI期间,培训有经验的放射治疗师执行轮廓和计划任务可以减少医生的工作量,同时不影响治疗质量。远程轮廓审查确保持续的质量和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and Impact of a Radiation Therapy Technologist-Driven Workflow for Cone Beam Computed Tomography Guided Partial Breast Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: Cone beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiation therapy (ART) allows significantly smaller planning target volume margins for patients treated with adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation. However, this approach places increased demands on the treatment team, particularly physicians. We hypothesize that with appropriate training, physicians' involvement at the treatment console can be reduced by delegating contouring and planning tasks to radiation therapy technologists (RTTs) with a physicist copilot without reducing treatment quality.

Materials and methods: In this prospective study designed to evaluate an RTT-driven workflow, 23 patients undergoing adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation were included, with 2 treatment plans generated per adaptive fraction. The first plan used contours edited by RTTs under physicist supervision (without physician oversight), and the second plan used contours edited by physicians. RTT-modified plans were compared with physician-edited contours for target coverage (V100% and V95%) and organ-at-risk constraints. The Dice coefficient and Hausdorff distance were calculated for target volumes. Following confirmation of RTT contour quality, we initiated the "remote physician" workflow to further reduce physician demand in the on-couch process. Physician review time was recorded to estimate the reduction in time required for ART. The number of treated fractions before and after implementation was also tracked.

Results: Analysis of 103 adaptive fractions showed a mean Dice coefficient of 0.96 for the tumor bed. The mean Hausdorff distance was 0.6 mm. Differences in planning target volume coverage were -1.0% ± 2.2% and -0.6% ± 1.3% for V100% and V95%, respectively. Similar metrics for the tumor bed and clinical target volume had differences of <0.4%. Physician time for ART was reduced by 12.3 ± 1.0 minutes per fraction, leading to a 224% increase in ART breast volume at our institution.

Conclusions: Training experienced radiation therapists to perform contouring and planning tasks reduces physician workload without compromising treatment quality during online adaptive stereotactic partial breast irradiation. Remote contour review ensures ongoing quality and consistency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信