窄带放大内镜对溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤的诊断价值。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Masafumi Nishio, Kingo Hirasawa, Yusuke Saigusa, Zhao Shiqi, Tokomi Kenemura, Takanori Hama, Reo Atsusaka, Daisuke Azuma, Yuichiro Ozeki, Atsushi Sawada, Ryosuke Ikeda, Takehide Fukuchi, Ryosuke Kobayashi, Chiko Sato, Tsuyoshi Ogashiwa, Sawako Chiba, Yoshiaki Inayama, Reiko Kunisaki, Shin Maeda
{"title":"窄带放大内镜对溃疡性结肠炎相关肿瘤的诊断价值。","authors":"Masafumi Nishio,&nbsp;Kingo Hirasawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Saigusa,&nbsp;Zhao Shiqi,&nbsp;Tokomi Kenemura,&nbsp;Takanori Hama,&nbsp;Reo Atsusaka,&nbsp;Daisuke Azuma,&nbsp;Yuichiro Ozeki,&nbsp;Atsushi Sawada,&nbsp;Ryosuke Ikeda,&nbsp;Takehide Fukuchi,&nbsp;Ryosuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Chiko Sato,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Ogashiwa,&nbsp;Sawako Chiba,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Inayama,&nbsp;Reiko Kunisaki,&nbsp;Shin Maeda","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis–associated neoplasia (UCAN) is crucial for surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the utility of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) in sporadic neoplasia diagnosis has been reported, its efficacy in UCAN remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ME-NBI for qualitative diagnosis of UCAN.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We generated 60 ME-NBI images (30 UCANs and 30 nonneoplasia lesions, including 10 polypoid and 20 nonpolypoid lesions) from patients with UC who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital between 2015 and 2023. Eleven endoscopists (seven experts and four trainees) independently assessed these images. Lesions were categorized into high- (≥ 80%), moderate- (50%–79%), and low- (&lt; 50%) accuracy groups on the basis of the correct diagnostic rate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall sensitivity, specificity, and correct diagnostic rates were 66.5%, 79.0%, and 71.8%, respectively. Experts tended to exhibit higher specificity than trainees (83% vs. 70%). Polypoid lesions showed higher sensitivity (92% vs. 54%) and lower specificity (61% vs. 88%) than nonpolypoid lesions. Overall, the kappa value was 0.411. In UCAN, 37%, 37%, and 24% were classified into the high-, moderate-, and low-accuracy groups, respectively. All endoscopists assessed one case of UCAN in the low-accuracy group as a nonneoplastic vessel with a surface pattern. Only two nonneoplasias were identified as having nonneoplastic vessel and surface patterns by all endoscopists.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrated the usefulness of ME-NBI for qualitative diagnosis, along with its limitations. A unique endoscopic diagnostic algorithm for UCAN, incorporating ME-NBI and other modalities, is necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"40 4","pages":"900-906"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of Magnifying Endoscopy With Narrow-Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis–Associated Neoplasia\",\"authors\":\"Masafumi Nishio,&nbsp;Kingo Hirasawa,&nbsp;Yusuke Saigusa,&nbsp;Zhao Shiqi,&nbsp;Tokomi Kenemura,&nbsp;Takanori Hama,&nbsp;Reo Atsusaka,&nbsp;Daisuke Azuma,&nbsp;Yuichiro Ozeki,&nbsp;Atsushi Sawada,&nbsp;Ryosuke Ikeda,&nbsp;Takehide Fukuchi,&nbsp;Ryosuke Kobayashi,&nbsp;Chiko Sato,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Ogashiwa,&nbsp;Sawako Chiba,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Inayama,&nbsp;Reiko Kunisaki,&nbsp;Shin Maeda\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgh.16877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis–associated neoplasia (UCAN) is crucial for surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the utility of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) in sporadic neoplasia diagnosis has been reported, its efficacy in UCAN remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ME-NBI for qualitative diagnosis of UCAN.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We generated 60 ME-NBI images (30 UCANs and 30 nonneoplasia lesions, including 10 polypoid and 20 nonpolypoid lesions) from patients with UC who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital between 2015 and 2023. Eleven endoscopists (seven experts and four trainees) independently assessed these images. Lesions were categorized into high- (≥ 80%), moderate- (50%–79%), and low- (&lt; 50%) accuracy groups on the basis of the correct diagnostic rate.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall sensitivity, specificity, and correct diagnostic rates were 66.5%, 79.0%, and 71.8%, respectively. Experts tended to exhibit higher specificity than trainees (83% vs. 70%). Polypoid lesions showed higher sensitivity (92% vs. 54%) and lower specificity (61% vs. 88%) than nonpolypoid lesions. Overall, the kappa value was 0.411. In UCAN, 37%, 37%, and 24% were classified into the high-, moderate-, and low-accuracy groups, respectively. All endoscopists assessed one case of UCAN in the low-accuracy group as a nonneoplastic vessel with a surface pattern. Only two nonneoplasias were identified as having nonneoplastic vessel and surface patterns by all endoscopists.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study demonstrated the usefulness of ME-NBI for qualitative diagnosis, along with its limitations. A unique endoscopic diagnostic algorithm for UCAN, incorporating ME-NBI and other modalities, is necessary.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"900-906\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16877\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgh.16877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:溃疡性结肠炎相关新生物(UCAN)的定性诊断对于溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的结肠镜监测至关重要。虽然有报道称窄带成像放大内镜(ME-NBI)在散发性肿瘤诊断中的作用,但其在 UCAN 中的疗效仍不明确。本研究旨在评估 ME-NBI 在 UCAN 定性诊断中的作用:我们从2015年至2023年间在本院接受结肠镜检查的UC患者中生成了60张ME-NBI图像(30张UCAN和30张非肿瘤病变,包括10张息肉样病变和20张非息肉样病变)。11 位内镜医师(7 位专家和 4 位实习医师)独立评估了这些图像。根据正确诊断率将病变分为高准确率组(≥ 80%)、中准确率组(50%-79%)和低准确率组(< 50%):总体灵敏度、特异性和正确诊断率分别为 66.5%、79.0% 和 71.8%。专家的特异性往往高于学员(83% 对 70%)。与非息肉病变相比,息肉病变的敏感性更高(92% 对 54%),特异性更低(61% 对 88%)。总体而言,卡帕值为 0.411。在 UCAN 中,分别有 37%、37% 和 24% 的人被归入高、中和低准确度组。所有内镜医师都将低准确度组中的一例 UCAN 评估为具有表面形态的非肿瘤血管。只有两例非肿瘤性血管和表面形态被所有内镜医师识别为非肿瘤性血管:这项研究证明了 ME-NBI 在定性诊断方面的实用性及其局限性。有必要结合 ME-NBI 和其他模式为 UCAN 制定独特的内镜诊断算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness of Magnifying Endoscopy With Narrow-Band Imaging for Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis–Associated Neoplasia

Background and Aim

Qualitative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis–associated neoplasia (UCAN) is crucial for surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the utility of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) in sporadic neoplasia diagnosis has been reported, its efficacy in UCAN remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ME-NBI for qualitative diagnosis of UCAN.

Methods

We generated 60 ME-NBI images (30 UCANs and 30 nonneoplasia lesions, including 10 polypoid and 20 nonpolypoid lesions) from patients with UC who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital between 2015 and 2023. Eleven endoscopists (seven experts and four trainees) independently assessed these images. Lesions were categorized into high- (≥ 80%), moderate- (50%–79%), and low- (< 50%) accuracy groups on the basis of the correct diagnostic rate.

Results

Overall sensitivity, specificity, and correct diagnostic rates were 66.5%, 79.0%, and 71.8%, respectively. Experts tended to exhibit higher specificity than trainees (83% vs. 70%). Polypoid lesions showed higher sensitivity (92% vs. 54%) and lower specificity (61% vs. 88%) than nonpolypoid lesions. Overall, the kappa value was 0.411. In UCAN, 37%, 37%, and 24% were classified into the high-, moderate-, and low-accuracy groups, respectively. All endoscopists assessed one case of UCAN in the low-accuracy group as a nonneoplastic vessel with a surface pattern. Only two nonneoplasias were identified as having nonneoplastic vessel and surface patterns by all endoscopists.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the usefulness of ME-NBI for qualitative diagnosis, along with its limitations. A unique endoscopic diagnostic algorithm for UCAN, incorporating ME-NBI and other modalities, is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信